- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A path to full-auto machine guns has now been established…
Posted on 2/4/25 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 2/4/25 at 9:57 pm
Here are the steps.
- Make a machine gun.
- Get caught with it.
- Go to court.
- Use this case decision as precedent.
- Court dismissal will be your permission slip to continue ownership.
- Make a machine gun.
- Get caught with it.
- Go to court.
- Use this case decision as precedent.
- Court dismissal will be your permission slip to continue ownership.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
3
Posted on 2/5/25 at 5:32 am to finchmeister08
quote:
Use this case decision as precedent.
TBD until the Supreme Court addresses it.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 8:32 am to finchmeister08
If you make a machine gun but never fire it, is it a machine gun?
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:36 am to HeadSlash
I think this more of a positive for those busted by the ATF under bullshite constructive possession charges. I don't think SCOTUS will take a case that cuts to the core of the NFA any time soon given they are slow walking AWB cases, think one that attacks the Hughes Amendment is a better path.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 3:09 pm to Wtodd
quote:
TBD until the Supreme Court addresses it.
They've shown they're fine with restrictions on machine guns. There's well under 200k civilian transferable in country, and it seems like that would fall short of the common use standard set in Bruen.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 3:35 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
There's well under 200k civilian transferable in country
Wrong…?
A report states that in 2021, the ATF announced that there are 741,000 legally registered machine guns in the country. Not sure if that includes/excludes SOT lowers for dealers that are post-1986.
https://www.cjonline.com/story/news/politics/government/2024/09/27/atf-report-how-many-machine-guns-are-in-kansas-and-other-u-s-states/75378162007/
Posted on 2/5/25 at 3:52 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
Wrong…?
A report states that in 2021, the ATF announced that there are 741,000 legally registered machine guns in the country. Not sure if that includes/excludes SOT lowers for dealers that are post-1986.
Most aren't transferable, for the reason you addressed in the last sentence.
Posted on 2/5/25 at 4:32 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 2/5/25 at 10:46 pm to HeadSlash
quote:
If you make a machine gun but never fire it, is it a machine gun?
Does the Pope shelter pedophiles and facilitate the abuse of children?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 6:36 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Most aren't transferable
apparently, the judge in this case didn't care if they're transferable or not. he used the 740,000 number as a reference for the "dangerous and unusual" argument in Bruen.
in the decision, he says:
quote:
Seven hundred and forty is no small number.
that's good news for us i guess.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 10:13 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
They've shown they're fine with restrictions on machine guns. There's well under 200k civilian transferable in country, and it seems like that would fall short of the common use standard set in Bruen
Did Bruen state they need to be transferrable?
Worst part of the stupid Luigi shite is the argument can easily be made that suppressors are common use items, and the political climate was very meh on them before that idiot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News