- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This turned my stomach a little
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:43 pm to The Sad Banana
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:43 pm to The Sad Banana
my only concern about them being dead first is rotting the water and spreading nasty cat germs 
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:43 pm to beans
Hm, you bring an excellent point to the table.
Solution: the cats will be numbed.
Solution: the cats will be numbed.
This post was edited on 6/4/10 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:44 pm to The Sad Banana
Erl running amuck > cat germs
Stick with the plan Bonehead. YOU WILL BE RICH
Stick with the plan Bonehead. YOU WILL BE RICH
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:47 pm to Meatloaf
Well, we need to think about collateral damage. Two wrongs don't make a right, Meat.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:47 pm to stout
I heard someone on talk radio the other day saying that there has been similar incidents such as this well disaster in Russia years past. On numerous occasions, they detonate a small underwater nuclear explosion, the shock of which stops the oil flow.
Supposedly, this would work, and it's not any new technology. Anybody ever heard of this?
Supposedly, this would work, and it's not any new technology. Anybody ever heard of this?
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:48 pm to VernonPLSUfan
Its awful.
I for one am headed to Grand Isle to save all these beautiful creatures from this oil.
I for one am headed to Grand Isle to save all these beautiful creatures from this oil.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:48 pm to Festus
quote:Orly Owl
detonate a small underwater nuclear explosion
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:49 pm to Festus
this has been done about a dozen times in russia. Always on land wells and always on a gas well.
It would also go against multiple nuclear treaties.
We also have no idea what type of environmental damage could be caused by this (it isn't like Russia cares).
It has been ruled out by nearly everyone in the government and labeled as "crazy" by senior nuclear scientists.
It would also go against multiple nuclear treaties.
We also have no idea what type of environmental damage could be caused by this (it isn't like Russia cares).
It has been ruled out by nearly everyone in the government and labeled as "crazy" by senior nuclear scientists.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:50 pm to Festus
quote:Russia did it to stop a huge gas leak, not oil... would probably work the same. Except I don't think that one was a mile underwater.
I heard someone on talk radio the other day saying that there has been similar incidents such as this well disaster in Russia years past. On numerous occasions, they detonate a small underwater nuclear explosion, the shock of which stops the oil flow.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:54 pm to Spirit of Dunson
quote:
this has been done about a dozen times in russia. Always on land wells and always on a gas well.
Didn't know this.
quote:
It would also go against multiple nuclear treaties.
Surely, if we advised the world of what we were detonating, and why, the UN would grant a one time waiver, right?
quote:
We also have no idea what type of environmental damage could be caused by this (it isn't like Russia cares).
It can't be much worse that the environmental damage happening now.
quote:
It has been ruled out by nearly everyone in the government
More reason to believe it would be efficient.
quote:
labeled as "crazy" by senior nuclear scientists.
I thought all nuclear scientists were crazy to begin with?
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:57 pm to Festus
a friend of mine had mentioned the nuclear option this weekend, and so I did some looking into it. It is not a good idea IMO.
And that brings us back to the original discussion. BP probably gets lots of these ideas that sound good on the surface, but really aren't. The public hears the surface points, thinks that there are a bunch of good ideas out there, and sees BP not using them. They then logically conclude that BP doesn't care. Except for the fact that the ideas are actually pretty crappy.
And that brings us back to the original discussion. BP probably gets lots of these ideas that sound good on the surface, but really aren't. The public hears the surface points, thinks that there are a bunch of good ideas out there, and sees BP not using them. They then logically conclude that BP doesn't care. Except for the fact that the ideas are actually pretty crappy.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:58 pm to Festus
Posted on 6/4/10 at 1:59 pm to stout
quote:
BP still being in charge of this at this point is a joke was more my point than to stop using oil, idiot.
Actually, Obama said in his presser a few days back that his administration has been in control of the effort from the start and that BP is acting at the gov't's direction.
Then he went on to place all of the blame "squarely" on BP.
Go figure...
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:00 pm to Spirit of Dunson
quote:
BP probably gets lots of these ideas that sound good on the surface, but really aren't.
the amount of ideas that i have seen coming in are absolutely ridiculous.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:00 pm to LSUBoo
quote:Counterpoint
Here's an article about nuking is.
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:04 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
White House Office of Science and Technology, Rich Pryor
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:04 pm to beans
quote:the more and more I think about the nuclear option, the more ridiculous I think it is on so many levels.
the amount of ideas that i have seen coming in are absolutely ridiculous.
ETA: Rich Pryor served in the office of science and technology from 1982-1984. So it isn't like he is abreast of the current issue. Granted, he is a VERY smart individual.
This post was edited on 6/4/10 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:05 pm to Deactived
quote:
Just fed some of the ones we rescued, they doing good but very edgy and nervous.
I hope BP has to pay for therapy for EVERY SINGLE NERVOUS BIRD!
Posted on 6/4/10 at 2:05 pm to Spirit of Dunson
i know people are only trying to help (or make a butt load of money) but some of the shite is absolutely absurd
Popular
Back to top


1






