- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is this Officially the Worst Oil Spill Disaster in World History?
Posted on 5/17/10 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 5/17/10 at 6:03 pm
I predicted in week one that this was the worst Oil Spill/Leak in World History because if was obvious the Oil Company's in charge had no idea how to stop the leak. Please vote:
A) Worst Oil Spill/Leak Disaster of the world.
B) There are other Oil Spills that are worse.
C) BP has it under control and it will be cleaned up quickly.
LINK
A) Worst Oil Spill/Leak Disaster of the world.
B) There are other Oil Spills that are worse.
C) BP has it under control and it will be cleaned up quickly.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/17/10 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 5/17/10 at 6:08 pm to TenTex
it's not even close to ixtoc i yet as far as volume goes
Posted on 5/17/10 at 6:58 pm to baytiger
It will cause unparrelled damage to the gulf coast and east coast during the next 5 months. Hurricanes that track over the oil will rain oil on the land at least 25 miles inland during this Hirricane season.
Posted on 5/17/10 at 7:43 pm to TenTex
quote:
It will cause unparrelled damage to the gulf coast and east coast during the next 5 months. Hurricanes that track over the oil will rain oil on the land at least 25 miles inland during this Hirricane season.
:OMG:
ONOZ IT'S GOING TO RAIN OIL!!!!!!!!!
Is that even a serious comment?
This still isn't as bad as the Exxon Valdez
1) because the volume spilled, most likely, has not matched the EV
2) because the time period that it is being spilled over allows for greater dilution
3) Because it's not as close to the shoreline as the EV was
quote:
TenTex
Please don't bring fear mongering and trolling to this board. I don't know you that well, but I've noticed you enough on the poli board to know that you are in the same league as Afreaux and Rex, when it comes to sensationalism in order to promote fear for the benefit of your agenda.
ETA: Good job on the anchor admins.
This post was edited on 5/17/10 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 5/17/10 at 8:16 pm to TheHiddenFlask
quote:
This still isn't as bad as the Exxon Valdez
1) because the volume spilled, most likely, has not matched the EV
2) because the time period that it is being spilled over allows for greater dilution
3) Because it's not as close to the shoreline as the EV was
Give it time and you will be proven wrong. come back and eat your crow when you take your green & yellow glasses off.
Posted on 5/17/10 at 8:27 pm to TheHiddenFlask
quote:
1) because the volume spilled, most likely, has not matched the EV
2) because the time period that it is being spilled over allows for greater dilution
3) Because it's not as close to the shoreline as the EV was
What the FK are you thinking. It is as big or bigger in volume already. It will have 50 times the economic impact than a spill in an unpopulated region for the most part. It will have a much much greater acological impact and spread up the east coact as well.
ANd can you really be serious about #2? What in the FKNG hell can you be thinking? It's not a slow leak. If it goes a longer period of time, it spills a Valdez about every ten days or so. It is spilling wya more than 5000 b/day.
I don't mean to hate on you, but that is seriously the least thought out post that I've heard. THis will make the Valdez look like a Jiffy Lube fire if you even try to compared the financial, ecological, environmaental etc impact of the two.
This post was edited on 5/17/10 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 5/17/10 at 9:36 pm to TenTex
It will probably be top 10 but nowhere near the worst. Apparently somebody is completely unaware of the fact that the massive spill after the Persian Gulf War is not just #1, but #2 (Ixtoc) isn't anywhere even remotely close. But news services weren't covering ecological losses in Kuwaiti desert.
Posted on 5/17/10 at 9:53 pm to foshizzle
quote:
But news services weren't covering ecological losses in Kuwaiti desert.
apples & oranges by any stretch of the imagination
Posted on 5/17/10 at 11:45 pm to C
quote:
C
quote:
C
Posted on 5/17/10 at 11:59 pm to windriver
quote:
quote:
But news services weren't covering ecological losses in Kuwaiti desert.
apples & oranges by any stretch of the imagination
No different from the fear of spills in ANWAR.
And Ixtoc I is pretty much apples to apples btw.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 12:37 am to foshizzle
Okay, so play it down like BP is doing and see where it all lands. That's really a great plan. I would much rather paint a worst case senario then sit back and say it's not so bad. Isn't that how people die in Hurricanes??? They don't think it will be so bad and then they stay and die. Fear Mongering? 
Posted on 5/18/10 at 7:56 am to TenTex
...it is not going to rain oil.....seriously.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:13 am to CharlesLSU
TBH, I suspect it would be actually beneficial for a hurricane to pass through.
Especially if it passes right after they clamp the well shut.
Especially if it passes right after they clamp the well shut.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:17 am to TenTex
quote:
Hurricanes that track over the oil will rain oil on the land
This may be sig worthy
Posted on 5/18/10 at 12:37 pm to the LSUSaint
quote:
It is as big or bigger in volume already.
So you are a top scientist working in the field I see.
quote:
It will have 50 times the economic impact than a spill in an unpopulated region for the most part.
And an economic scholar, trained in geographical information systems.
quote:
It will have a much much greater acological impact and spread up the east coact as well.
And a pioneer in the field of acology?
quote:
ANd can you really be serious about #2? What in the FKNG hell can you be thinking?
But your ability to detect seriousness is lacking.
quote:
If it goes a longer period of time, it spills a Valdez about every ten days or so.
So you are saying it has already leaked 750,000 barrels (31.5 million gallons) of oil and virtually none of it has hit shore? Good guess Einstein.Truth is, no one knows, but assholes like you going around and spewing lies aren't making the situation any better. 5000 barrels a day is the official estimate, talking about possible amounts is worthless. It could also be 2000 barrels a day, I don't want to discuss that either.
quote:
I don't mean to hate on you, but that is seriously the least thought out post that I've heard.
What?
quote:
THis will make the Valdez look like a Jiffy Lube fire if you even try to compared the financial, ecological, environmaental etc impact of the two.
Hyperbole much? That's the problem with you naysayers. You were saying the same thing when Calcasieu Lake was "infected" by an oil spill a few years back. Why don't you go out there and point me to the crippling ecological (or acological, as you would say) effects of that spill.
If you guys want to talk about me coming back to eat my crow, then you should eat crow for that, right here and now.
Popular
Back to top
2







