Started By
Message

re: WWII hypothetical: could Britain have defeated Germany by itself after June 1940

Posted on 4/25/16 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 4:59 pm to
Lol, no
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17232 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Germans would have died in Norilsk


The Germans didn't need to push any further than the Ural Mountains at the absolute most. The war would have been effectively over and won if the Soviets were falling back and setting up defensive lines on the Asian side of the mountains.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
How would the Germans get supplies to Vladivostok?
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:02 pm to
The guy that posted earlier regarding Hitler's motivations is correct which kinda makes the thread moot. There is no scenario where Russia stays out of the war because Hitler's entire goal was to open up the East for Germany.

He just didn't have enough to knock Britian out of the war to secure his rear while he went east. Wouldn't have worked anyway. We'd have still come through Africa and gotten into Europe via the south route.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74612 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Lol, no

Either you're trolling or have an amazing lack of knoweldge of geography. Look at how far east Norilsk is located...



If the Germans had reached that far east, then all of European Russia and a good chunk of Russia to the east of the Urals would have already fallen to the Germans. So yes, had for some odd reason the Germans reached Norilsk, they'd have already won the war in the East.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74612 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

How would the Germans get supplies to Vladivostok?

If the Germans were even having to worry about getting supplies to Vladivostok, then they would not have to worry about fighting the Soviets any longer.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17232 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

How would the Germans get supplies to Vladivostok?


Wut?
Posted by Ping Pong
LSU and UVA alum
Member since Aug 2014
6290 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:17 pm to
You cant assume neutrality of the Soviet Union since they were invaded by Germany. Germany's dire need of oil caused Hitler to violate his non-aggression pact with Stalin and invade Russia in attempt to gain control of the Caucasus oil fields.

Even with removing Japan and the US from the picture, Germany would have still needed to either successfully defeat the Russians or find an alternative oil source before executing Operation Sea Lion (the planned invasion of Great Britain).

Germany would need more oil to continue their bombing runs on London and their submarines sinking British ships in the Atlantic.

With more oil, the Germans best chance to defeat England would be through a forceful surrender after causing starvation through sinking of the supply ships in the Atlantic and terror through bombings. Even most members of the German High Command believed Operation Sea Lion had a small chance of success with the most powerful Navy in the world defending Great Britian in the English Channel.

Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:31 pm to
Yeah, they would have been in Vladivostok by 1949. When we had atomic bomb and killed all their scum.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:34 pm to
This is hypothetical anyway

We beat the Nazis

I just wish after raping and killing in Berlin, we could have caught Hitler
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:36 pm to
I can name 10 Ural cities if you want
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:37 pm to
Ok now I know you're dumb
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96246 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

If the Germans had reached that far east


Even Hitler knew better than to stay out of Asia at that point. I think he would have established a rough line from Leningrad down through Moscow and Stalingrad, essentially reversing the line the Soviets actually held. Logistically, that makes sense. That's in the Steppe and the further East he pushed, the longer his lines would have gotten.

His fall back might have been Ukraine and if Stalin had been amenable, he might have accepted that as a victor's prize.

But, maybe not.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17232 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:48 pm to
quote:


WWII hypothetical
You cant assume neutrality of the Soviet Union since they were invaded by Germany. Germany's dire need of oil caused Hitler to violate his non-aggression pact with Stalin and invade Russia in attempt to gain control of the Caucasus oil fields.

Even with removing Japan and the US from the picture, Germany would have still needed to either successfully defeat the Russians or find an alternative oil source before executing Operation Sea Lion (the planned invasion of Great Britain).


The Germans didn't launch Barbarossa because they needed oil from the Caucasus to carry out the war with Britain. The campaign for the Caucasus oil fields only came with Operation Blau in 1942. The reasons for invading the USSR ran much deeper than resource acquisition for the current struggle with Britain. Besides, the Non-Aggression Pact was already providing the Germans with Soviet natural resources.

If it had anything to do with oil it was to eliminate the Soviet threat to the Romanian oil fields and to the Eastern borders of the Reich in general.

Hitler's ambition to find Lebensraum in Russia had to do with securing Germany as a world power for centuries, not because they had an immediate need for the resources in order to prosecute the war with Britain.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17232 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I can name 10 Ural cities if you want


That would mean absolutely nothing to me. The shear fact that you don't seem to comprehend that the Germans weren't going to make some ridiculous push to the Pacific shores of Russia because it would have been completely pointless illustrates that you seem hampered in this discussion by your apparent national pride.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 5:58 pm to
The shear fact you think Russia would ever give up shows how you're wrong
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17232 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

The shear fact you think Russia would ever give up shows how you're wrong


Right. Because Russia never gives up. Like in 1917...

And regardless, if the Germans had reached the Ural Mountains, the Soviets could have tried all they wanted but they'd never have pushed the Germans back at that point. Not to mention the possibility of a coup that may have ousted the Communists, which would have been a blessing for mankind.
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 6:10 pm to
Russia giving up in 1917 was a calculated plan to kill the tsar
Posted by Mr Personality
Bangkok
Member since Mar 2014
27364 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 6:13 pm to
Blessing to mankind? Lol

We beat Hitler and if Khrushchev and Gorbachev weren't total bitches we would have killed your arse too
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 4/25/16 at 6:15 pm to
When history books are written in 200 years, the story will be how European countries bled themselves dry during 20th Century wars and the after effects, especially with regards to Germany, led to a shift too far the other way with regards to an aversion to war and nationalism. Couple that with political correctness fueled by guilt via the holocaust and colonialism and that brought on Eurostan.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram