- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:51 pm to dallastigers
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:51 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Only the left has offered up versions of this incident that are completely divorced from reality.
Objectively and indisputably false.
1
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:53 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Are you going to answer my question about Benghazi?
Of course you aren't. You don't want to admit that no politician has integrity. It's not "this administration" , it's every single one.
Of course you aren't. You don't want to admit that no politician has integrity. It's not "this administration" , it's every single one.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:55 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
no politician has integrity. It's not "this administration" , it's every single one.
Yet you cuck for this one.
Strange.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:57 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Why are you ignoring my question?
Are you cucking for Obama, Clinton and Rice?
Are you cucking for Obama, Clinton and Rice?
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:59 pm to DCtiger1
Nope
I’ll never vote for them again.
Happy?
I’ll never vote for them again.
Happy?
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:02 pm to HogBalls
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:04 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Nope what? Did Obama, Rice and Clinton lie about the cause of the attack? Did they blame it on a YouTube video making fun of Muhammad, even though there was a terror alert that an attack was imminent, based on actionable intel?
Did they intentionally lie about the reason a US ambassador, DOD staff and two GRS were murdered?
Did they then intentionally cover up prior requests for security improvements and additional forces other than a six man DSS detail and local militia?
Did they intentionally lie about the reason a US ambassador, DOD staff and two GRS were murdered?
Did they then intentionally cover up prior requests for security improvements and additional forces other than a six man DSS detail and local militia?
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:05 pm to DCtiger1
Just ignore it, bro. It’s no big deal. Draw your own conclusions.
(That’s your stance, right?)
(That’s your stance, right?)
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:08 pm to NawlinsTiger9
You simply can't engage in genuine conversation. You continue to deflect. It's okay to disagree, it's not the end of the world. You clearly don't actually want to have conversation, you just want to be right.
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:10 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
You simply can't engage in genuine conversation
Just matching your energy, bub.
quote:
okay to disagree, it's not the end of the world.
It actually sounds like we agree that lying is bad, mmkay.
You just excuse the lies you like.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:14 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Not excusing any lies, you're simply ignoring what I'm asking because you don't want to have a real conversation about the truth of all administrations. You just want to deflect and pretend it's somehow new that Trump is doing it.
Btw, everyone with a brain within DOS, DOD, and the intelligence community knew what the Obama administration shared was BS, and yes they looked objectively at the facts and came to their own conclusions about what truly happened over there.
Btw, everyone with a brain within DOS, DOD, and the intelligence community knew what the Obama administration shared was BS, and yes they looked objectively at the facts and came to their own conclusions about what truly happened over there.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:16 pm to DCtiger1
Look man, if you want to talk about decades old political happenings, this probably ain’t the thread for that
It seems like you very much care about the honesty and integrity of political administrations
Which is why you should care about this
It shouldn’t have to happen to you for it to matter to you
It seems like you very much care about the honesty and integrity of political administrations
Which is why you should care about this
It shouldn’t have to happen to you for it to matter to you
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:21 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Decades old? May want to revisit when Benghazi happened.
I was boots on the ground after the attack, and couldn't fathom why an administration would falsify the cause of the attack. You suggesting this is somehow irrelevant to the point you're trying to make is peak irony. I was quite literally in harms way, while the administration accepted blame for the attack and apologized for a video.
Should politicians have integrity? Yes. Do they? No. Does what a president say change the objective facts of reality? No. Does it influence brainless mouth breathers on both sides? Yes
I was boots on the ground after the attack, and couldn't fathom why an administration would falsify the cause of the attack. You suggesting this is somehow irrelevant to the point you're trying to make is peak irony. I was quite literally in harms way, while the administration accepted blame for the attack and apologized for a video.
Should politicians have integrity? Yes. Do they? No. Does what a president say change the objective facts of reality? No. Does it influence brainless mouth breathers on both sides? Yes
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:23 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
Should politicians have integrity? Yes.
Okay, good to hear. Glad we agree.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:24 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Clearly you don't feel having integrity in your conversations is important.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:24 pm to TDTOM
Waste of energy.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:26 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Imagine being on page 67 of this thread and still defending Good.
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:26 pm to DCtiger1
I do. That’s why I’m staying on topic.
You said to ignore the falsehoods of this administration when you clearly can’t ignore the falsehoods of 14 years ago.
You admit that an administration getting material facts wrong or outright lying is not a good thing.
We are on the same page in this regard.
I don’t know why we had to go around the world to get here, but we have arrived, and that’s all that matters.
You said to ignore the falsehoods of this administration when you clearly can’t ignore the falsehoods of 14 years ago.
You admit that an administration getting material facts wrong or outright lying is not a good thing.
We are on the same page in this regard.
I don’t know why we had to go around the world to get here, but we have arrived, and that’s all that matters.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:27 pm to Centinel
Imagine whiffing this fricking bad on the context of the discussion 
Page 67 of 78
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News