- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith's BAC 3x the legal limit when he was shot
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:00 pm to lsuwontonwrap
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:00 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
killing drunk people is legal or something?
if said drunk person kicks down your front door (here's my uninformed assumption that Bryce Dejean-Jones... the Pelicans player killed over the weekend... was drunk)... it can be deemed legal
right now Smith being drunk doesn't immediately make him a threat
0
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:00 pm to rt3
quote:
Being 3x the legal limit isn't an excuse to shoot someone.
naw but we know
- he left the scene of a hit and run
- ran a red light
- illegally possessed a firearm
- was driving while intoxicated
what we dont really know is what happened after the 2nd crash. Y'all keep saying he didnt deserve to be shot for being drunk, which is true. But we know he was acting erratically just minutes before the crash, yet you are going to fail to acknowledge that maybe, just maybe, the shooter was warranted in firing his weapon based on something Will SMith may have done towards him?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:01 pm to reddman
quote:
And Will Smith having a BAC of .24 could certainly help do that.
You're assuming a great many other facts. On its own it does absolutely nothing whatsoever.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:02 pm to reddman
I am willing to bet everyone at the scene was impaired and acting retarded.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:02 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
what we dont really know is what happened after the 2nd crash.
Which is LITERALLY the only thing that matters in this case.
quote:
maybe, just maybe, the shooter was warranted in firing his weapon
We have no facts to support this assertion yet.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:02 pm to Nado Jenkins83
youre probably right 
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
But of course the idiots are using this as some kind of smoking gun.
It's not a smoking gun at all, but to dismiss this news as irrelevant is off-base.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
You're assuming a great many other facts
like the pro-smith crowd is assuming a lot too. until we get some real witness statements its not clear what happened.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:03 pm to reddman
quote:
Guilty until proven innocent.
Hayes has admitted to it... now he had to give a why
apparently police and a grand jury didn't think it a good enough reason... that's why he was arrested abd charged with murder
now a jury will have the final say
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:03 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
You're assuming a great many other facts. On its own it does absolutely nothing whatsoever.
I'm not assuming ANYTHING.
I said it COULD help. COULD.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:04 pm to rt3
quote:
apparently police and a grand jury didn't think it a good enough reaso
saints fans?
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:05 pm to reddman
quote:
It's not a smoking gun at all, but to dismiss this news as irrelevant is off-base.
I'm not dismissing it. I'm saying the typical TD jumping to conclusions is stupid. This doesn't mean anything unless its put into RELEVANT context, ie what happened after Hayes intentionally crashed into Smith's vehicle. It COULD have some bearing but as of now, it doesn't mean a whole lot.
Just wait and see.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:05 pm to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
killing drunk people is legal or something?
According to the OT, it must be.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:06 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We have no facts to support this assertion yet.
absolutely true.
but people keep saying "derp derp he doesnt deserve to die because he was drunk".
this board is so dumb sometimes. No one is saying that.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
- he left the scene of a hit and run
- ran a red light
- illegally possessed a firearm
- was driving while intoxicated
None of which is grounds for a civilian to put 8 bullets into him.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:07 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
but people keep saying "derp derp he doesnt deserve to die because he was drunk".
this board is so dumb sometimes. No one is saying that.
Less people are saying that and more people are acting like this is some kind of smoking gun, in my mind.
There's nothing to be drawn from this whatsoever without relevant context.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:09 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
more people are acting like this is some kind of smoking gun, in my mind.
Who are these people? I only recall TigerFred saying it is looking more and more likely that he's going to get off. Other than that, I haven't read anyone saying that this proves Hayes' innocence.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:10 pm to Fun Bunch
look above your post
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:10 pm to Lester Earl
many on this board generally has a stance of 'if he didn't do anything wrong then none of this may have happened, so he deserved it.' It gets brought up in almost every 'dindu nuffins' thread.
so...I am betting none of that applies here.
so...I am betting none of that applies here.
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:10 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
None of which is grounds for a civilian to put 8 bullets into him
If you were hayes (stay with me now, this is a hypothetical), and you "rear end" smith.
again stay with me, all this happens don't say "i wouldn't have followed or some shite"
and a drunk smith gets out claiming he has a gun or Raquel pulls the gun. what do you do?
ask for an autograph?
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News