- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why dont Oil Field Workers have savings accounts ?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:22 am to Chad504boy
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:22 am to Chad504boy
quote:
#TruckNutz
anywhere from $9 to $70
and ???
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:23 am to volod
quote:
why not save 20% of the money in savings and live off of 80% of the money
Yeti Coolers
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:23 am to volod
The average oilfield worker would have to save 20% for around 5 years to have one year's salary saved. Most of these baws are looking at a year or more of being out of work in their chosen profession.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:24 am to volod
I lived off 30% and saved 70%
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:25 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
and? if you lose your job you are still going to be in a bad financial spot...since you don't have a job and all
Great point. Why save for a rainy day and have money available for you and your family so you can weather the storm until you find another job, when you can always opt for the alternative which is to live paycheck to paycheck and potentially be homeless and car-less as soon as you get laid off.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:25 am to volod
quote:
I am sure some do. However, I keep reading articles on how so many residents of the Louisiana and southern Texas areas are hurting badly over the drop in oil prices.
Are you suggesting that if someone saved for a downturn they still would not be hurting badly after being out of work for a year or so?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:27 am to yellowfin
quote:
Most people do not have adequate savings no matter the industry they work in
I am trying to break into my industry, so I can perfectly understand this.
The only reason I single out oil field workers is that I know they can easily make up to 6 figures. With that type of money, you could easily set aside money as long you make smart financial decisions.
You need to work eventually after a few months.. but still it never hurts to padded bed for the tight spots
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:28 am to redstick13
quote:
The average oilfield worker would have to save 20% for around 5 years to have one year's salary saved.
How many years for other fields?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:28 am to yellowfin
quote:
Most people do not have adequate savings no matter the industry they work in
One should spend and save relative to the volatility of the industry in which they are employed. I'm not saying this is a great thread, but that's the point of the thread.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:30 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
How many years for other fields?
Around 5.
I was attempting to point out that the up and down nature of this industry might not give you 5 good years in a row to save.
This post was edited on 3/7/16 at 10:31 am
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:30 am to UpToPar
quote:
Are you suggesting that if someone saved for a downturn they still would not be hurting badly after being out of work for a year or so?
No. It would not save anyone by month 9 to a year out of a job. However, it will give them some time to network and possibly find another job (albeit probably a lower salary).
Also, as I said in the OP, technically this could be prevented if they found other industries while times were good.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:31 am to yellowfin
quote:
damn you're dumb
Solid retort. Logical and well-reasoned.
Did you feel insulted because you live paycheck to paycheck?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:33 am to redstick13
quote:
The average oilfield worker would have to save 20% for around 5 years to have one year's salary saved. Most of these baws are looking at a year or more of being out of work in their chosen profession.
So they shouldn't bother?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:34 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
So they shouldn't bother?
Exactly. Some of the financial planning theories in this thread are what you'd expect to hear from a child.
"There's no way they can save enough to maintain their current lifestyle for an entire year if they were to become unemployed, so there's no point in even trying to save money."
This post was edited on 3/7/16 at 10:36 am
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:34 am to volod
I met a guy last week that has been laid off for 3 months from his oil field job. He's been trapping beavers, catching catfish to sell, and painting houses lately. Said he has enough saved to last a couple years just making a couple hundred a week doing these odd jobs. Stereotypes are silly.
What size spinning rims do you have on your Impala?
What size spinning rims do you have on your Impala?
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:39 am to Pecker
quote:
There's no way they can save enough to maintain their current lifestyle for an entire year if they were to become unemployed
I never said anything about maintaining their current lifestyle.
All I am trying to do is suggest a way to keep people from being homeless and hungry. I am not trying to push them back into being well off.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:39 am to volod
quote:
It also opens doors to people who may have had some difficulties with their previous educational endeavors (such as myself)
Translation: It's a place for students who should have never gone to a 4 year university, and should have gone to a trade school.
Posted on 3/7/16 at 10:43 am to UpToPar
quote:
I'd venture to guess that 80% of working class citizens couldn't make it a year on their savings with little to no income.
A year?
I'm pretty good with my money and I would be hurting with a year of no income.
This post was edited on 3/7/16 at 10:45 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News