re: Why didn't a foreign nation invade during the Civil war?

quote:

---

They remembered what happened last time. They've been our bitch ever since.

---

In 1860's had Great Briton fully committed to taking the US back by force they absolutely could have done so, their issue was they were too busy everywhere else for this type of all out assault.

They were far to busy expanding colonies in Canada, Australia, India as well as hundreds of other locations along with the just ended Opium war and uprising in India, the US just was not worth the effort it would have required.

We were almost at war with GB anyway in the Pig War but it remained isolated.

Anyone who thinks it was because they were scared is a fool.

quote:

---

Didn't UK have troops from Canada and Australia? Nz, India ? Africa

---

They did, but a few things:
1. Canada and Australia, even then, were much smaller population-wise than the U.S. The combined population of both in 1860 was about 4 million...or about 1/8th that of the pre-war U.S.

2. In both India and Africa, the locals were as likely to be adversaries to the British at that time as they were to be fighting in a British uniform. The British themselves had nothing more than an expeditionary colonial army that was almost certainly not prepared to take on an enormous and industrialized force halfway across the world. They were only able to send ~100,000 to the Crimea (only 1/3 the number of French) about five years before the Civil War kicked off. A force that size would have been swatted away by either side of the Civil War, and Britain needed that force much more badly elsewhere anyway.

3. The simple logistical feat of shipping, then equipping, then training, then keeping discipline, then supplying a large enough army to conceivably have decent odds of victory from that disparate and disunited a supply of soldiers was pretty much beyond any country at that point, even the British. The Union Army had 2.1 million men at its peak, and that's without taking into account that the 1 million or so Confederates probably wouldn't have all automatically been allies, either. It was as modern and industrial as any army in the world by 1863, not some ragtag colonial or tribal confederation.

4. The Mexicans had little interest. They hated each other more than they could have ever hated the Americans at that point, and they couldn't really do squat at the time, anyway. They just didn't have the capacity to transport a large and modern invasion force - including artillery, repeating rifles, trains, trenching materiel, field hospitals, telegraph lines, mines, and so on and so on - through northern Mexico and into the Southwestern U.S. at that point.

Ottoman in 1918 held off British. Why could they not had a say? They had spirit maybe not techno

quote:

---

In 1860's had Great Briton fully committed to taking the US back by force they absolutely could have done so

---

Doubtful.

By 1865, the United States had nearly two million men under arms in the army alone. The Grand Army of the Republic was among the most well-equipped and battle-hardened fighting forces on the planet at that point in time, with some very solid leadership at all levels of command. Also...the defenses around Washington D.C. were the most formidable in the world and would have made Swiss cheese of any attacking force whether they be Confederate or foreign.

quote:

---

In 1860's had Great Briton fully committed to taking the US back by force they absolutely could have done so

---

Nonsense.

1776 populations - Britain around 7 million, the US 2.5 million.

1860 populations - US 31 million, Britain 29 million.

Taking the US by force with the logistics required was impossible by 1860. They also weren't scared of us any more than we were scared of them, for the same reason.

Canada is the wild card in this. The population was under 4 million in 1860 so not a strong base for coming after the US, but it could have helped the logistics somewhat. But if they try this they can probably kiss Canada goodbye. Not a smart play.

Someone needs to make an alternate history novel about Great Britain invading. I would read that.

There is an alternate history novel Guns of the South by Harry Turtledove about the civil war but it is about time travel. An Australian supremacy type group time travels back to civil war to give Robert E Lee and the confederacy AK-47's to change the outcome. It is a fascinating read. Took a lot of flack and if I am not mistaken HBO tried making it a show but we all know why that didn't happen.

The guy also makes alternate history books about WW2 where aliens invade right in the middle of the war by mistake. If I remember correctly they aimed to invade at about the time we were in medieval times but landed in WW2 era and we pretty much give them more than they bargained for.

Book

quote:

---

Ottoman in 1918 held off British. Why could they not had a say? They had spirit maybe not techno

---

Because engaging in a bitter defense on entrenched home turf compared to sending an expeditionary force halfway across the world to take on the largest modern army in the world at the time is like comparing an apple to Mars.

If foreign nations knew it was going to last 4-5 years, they would have invaded.

When it started, they thought it would be a glorified duel that lasted a few days.