Started By
Message

re: Who believes in miracles?

Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:04 pm to
Posted by KajunLass
Member since Apr 2022
330 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:04 pm to
I got your miracle right here, nerd.
Teenjus
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74933 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Funny enough, that study was also done by a Catholic. You don't mind Catholic scientists when you think their work helps your argument
Of course. They'd have more interest in fudging like the folks in Poland. Yet they found it could be replicated.

quote:

Just because your saying it's poor research doesn't mean it was
It wasn't just me. It was their employer.

quote:

It's been 17 years. In all likely, it can't be replicated
There were requests to do further study back then. The Church refused.

quote:

There are instances of eucharistic miracles in which they tested and concluded it was not bacteria
No, there aren't. None with any rigor and multiple objective opinions.
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
5627 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

No, there aren't. None with any rigor and multiple objective opinions.
The other on in Poland, the one in Argentina that converted a New York scientist after his study...it will never be enough for you
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74933 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

the one in Argentina
The tests conducted at Forensics Analytical in 1999 are consistent with rotting bread and inconsistent with heart tissue. In particular:
The ortho-tolidine test was negative, indicating that the tissue did not contain myoglobin, and thus is not muscle of any kind

quote:

.it will never be enough for you
Because I'm not gullible.
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 4:34 pm
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34046 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 4:34 pm to
Shake the dust off your sandals and move along...
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
5627 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

The tests conducted at Forensics Analytical in 1999 are consistent with rotting bread and inconsistent with heart tissue. In particular: The ortho-tolidine test was negative, indicating that the tissue did not contain myoglobin, and thus is not muscle of any kind
Happy to read where you got that if you can provide it. That’s not what I remember that study saying. Also there was a study done in 1992, 1994, 1996, 1999, 2002, and 2004. They all said that?
This post was edited on 4/29/25 at 5:04 pm
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
5627 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Shake the dust off your sandals and move along...
Nah I’m good
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34046 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:33 pm to
I think you missed the reference.
No offense.
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
5627 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

I think you missed the reference. No offense.
Sorry, indeed I did .
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74933 posts
Posted on 4/29/25 at 6:11 pm to
It took seven doctors to look at the sample and the final one thought it was cardiac tissue. The other 6 did not.

The studies are not easy to find and are often in foreign languages. You'll have to settle for this...or not.
Forensicsjournal .com
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram