- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the benefit to driver-less cars?
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:09 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:09 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:Well, when we're talking about how likely it is that ambulance chasers will clog up our legal system and waste taxpayer dollars while simultaneously hindering technological progress that would save lives and greatly reduce or eliminate the "work" for themselves, I think the need for government involvement should be obvious.
i think an improvement in our world would be if the government stayed out of it. they frick up everything
Driverless vehicles are the ultimate safety feature. It would be a shame to let lawyers who rely on unsafe vehicles for income to frick up this revolution.
0
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:11 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:Hilarious, right? The idea that the people charged with leading the nation might actually lead the nation. I can dream, can't I?
TigerstuckinMS
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:18 pm to Korkstand
soon we will be in these. can't wait
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:41 pm to Korkstand
quote:
This is still America, so I believe you will still have the right to drive your vehicles for the foreseeable future.
If you like driving, you can drive yourself!
Posted on 9/6/16 at 5:52 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
will the car get in a wreck to save children on the sidewalk or jump the curb and mow them down while you read harry potter?
The car will be programmed to safely protect the most lives in a potential accident. Example: Say 5 kids run out in front of a driver-less car carrying one lone person. The car may have to make the decision to avoid the 5 kids and hit a pole killing you, the lone rider. The car will take the least amount of lives, thus you "may" be dead.
Nearly 1.3 million people die in road crashes each year, on average 3,287 deaths a day. I know you'll say you'd rather make that decision to avoid the kids or hit them, killing 5 kids and save your own life. The driver-less car actually saves lives.
The scenario I mentioned above is part of the programming problem. The kids were at fault, yet you died. Do car makers have this right? It's a big argument within the driver-less car community.
This post was edited on 9/6/16 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 9/6/16 at 6:09 pm to mattz1122
some day they will all be controlled by GPS and then there won't be accidents or rubber necking traffic jams
Posted on 9/6/16 at 8:21 pm to MardiGrasCajun
quote:
The car may have to make the decision to avoid the 5 kids and hit a pole killing you, the lone rider. The car will take the least amount of lives, thus you "may" be dead.
frick this and frick you.
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News