Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Webb Space Telescope pushed back again, won’t launch until 2021

Posted on 6/28/18 at 10:57 pm
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31596 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 10:57 pm
LINK




Today, NASA announced that it accepted the findings and recommendations of an independent review of progress toward the launch of the James Webb Space Telescope, intended to be NASA's next great observatory. As a result of some changed procedures and reining in some unjustified schedule optimism, the changes will mean that Webb won't be launched until March of 2021, a delay that will tack on $800 million to the telescope's $8 billion price tag.

Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159006 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:00 pm to
Bill Clinton helped build the Webb-Hubble telescope, but it was later mysteriously destroyed
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
20645 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:00 pm to
Not concerned.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
20376 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:01 pm to
We’ll recover
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45540 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Webb Space Telescope


If that name sounds familiar it should. It was named after Dr Charles C Webb, namesake of the Webb golf course in BR. Most people don’t know this but Dr Webb played an integral role in the founding of Baton Rouge. Some say he was the one who first noticed the red stick that the Indians placed to ward off evil spirits.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159006 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Most people don’t know this but Dr Webb played an integral role in the founding of Baton Rouge. Some say he was the one who first noticed that a trail loop around the city would help ease congestion from covered wagon traffic.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
173715 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:08 pm to
My scientists and astrophysicists say this is for the best.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31596 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:09 pm to
That’s not who it was named after..
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159006 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

That’s not who it was named after
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

Not concerned.


Same.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45423 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:33 pm to
Lets just get it right. Honestly, the greatest instrument in human history. Another year doesnt really matter.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31596 posts
Posted on 6/28/18 at 11:38 pm to
We need to get it right for sure but Northrup Grumman is really frickin it up unnecessarily.


The problems come largely from the work of Northrop Grumman, which is building the spacecraft and its sun shield. Incidents detailed in the report include using a solvent to clean valves without checking with the valve manufacturer; the improper solvent damaged the valves and forced their replacement. In another case, managers relied on the word of a single technician that test wiring was installed properly. As a result, hardware was exposed to excess voltage.

In a final case, fasteners for the sunscreen weren't tightened sufficiently prior to testing under simulated launch conditions. Over a dozen of them popped loose, several ended up inside the spacecraft body, and two of them still haven't been definitively located. During a press call today, the chair of the review board, Tom Young, estimated that these instances alone pushed the launch back by six months at the cost of roughly $1 million a day.
Posted by GetEmTigers08
Mississippi
Member since Dec 2007
1242 posts
Posted on 6/29/18 at 7:04 am to
This sucks. I was really looking forward to the launch. But it's definitely for the best. You have to imagine, this telescope is being sent to the L2 Lagrangian point in space. If something goes wrong, even if it's trivial, then that's billions of dollars down the drain. Zero chance that a repair/retrieval of any kind could be sent to the telescope.

This is the distances we are talking:

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram