Started By
Message

re: We dont have the shipbuilding capability China does...but,,,,,

Posted on 3/2/25 at 8:12 pm to
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7199 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 8:12 pm to
Stunningly dumb.

The Chinese can't sail a nuclear sub down a *river* without sinking the damned thing. They struggle to operate outside of sight of land, and have no logistical support train that would allow a blue water capacity.

One of those 'carrier groups' is an ex-casino, and another is a cheap facsimilie of that ex-casino.

They aren't a peer power, they aren't a near peer power, they aren't even in the neighborhood.

Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
21647 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

The Chinese are building a modern navy at a frightening rate,

Are they, though?

They have a frick ton of individual boats, but look up the tonnage they have compared to our navy. It's not even close. They're building a bunch of junk that still doesn't have them as a "blue water" navy. It's a bunch of coastal patrol boats.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
60603 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

They're building a bunch of junk that still doesn't have them as a "blue water" navy. It's a bunch of coastal patrol boats.


South La shipyards could ramp up in a year and out build the bull shite that these chicken littles are giving the chinese credit for.
They might could have a big enough navy that attack Tawain. LOL
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 8:40 pm
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
24909 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 9:47 pm to
A lot of this sounds like the 1920s and 30s when everyone was laughing at Japan...
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 9:52 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68864 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

A lot of this sounds like the 1920s and 30s when everyone was laughing at Japan...


That’s what’s sad about this thread. Everyone thinks naval warfare is just about aircraft carriers. But that’s only one part of the equation. You have to have the ability to support those aircraft carriers. That requires a whole hell of a lot of support ships to keep the carriers not only safe, but also supplied. And then there is the matter of making up for losses. If it came down to a shooting war with China, as things stand today, China has the capability to replace losses on their fleet. We do not.

Let the downvotes rain down. But it’s the irrefutable truth. And the longer we deny it, the longer we keep whistling past the graveyard instead of doing something about it.
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 10:12 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:09 pm to
whats sad about your post is the technology of warfare has substantially changed and the US holds the overwhelming advantage over both china and russia



We aren't needing to move troops and supplies across oceans anymore we can just kill the enemy with drones while sitting safely ensconced in a chair thousands of miles away

go build a model
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68864 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

whats sad about your post is the technology of warfare has substantially changed and the US holds the overwhelming advantage over both china and russia


What’s sad about your post it is shows you have no concept of logistics.

quote:

We aren't needing to move troops and supplies across oceans anymore we can just kill the enemy with drones while sitting safely ensconced in a chair thousands of miles away




Look, I love you brother, but you’re in over your head here.

This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 10:14 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:14 pm to
great argument

no facts

Warfare has changed; we hold the technological advantage .


Where am I wrong?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
137888 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:19 pm to
Darth regrets that he has but two lives to give for his country.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:20 pm to
he drove a tank and thinks he's Patton
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68864 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

great argument no facts Warfare has changed; we hold the technological advantage . Where am I wrong?


I spelled out where you’re wrong.

1. China has the capability to make good its losses in a naval war while we don’t (see my first post on this thread)

2. Even with technology, logistics still is what wins wars. It was our ace in the hole that won WWII and made us the dominant military force in the world for the second half of the 20th century. And as things stand today, we lack the naval logistics capability to sustain a protracted war on the other side of the Pacific against China. I don’t like it. I freaking hate it. But it’s time we as a country admit it and address the problem because it’s not a problem that is a quick fix. China has been gearing up for a war in the South China Sea for decades. It’s time we do the same.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
137888 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:27 pm to
He was in the motor pool. He may have backed a tank into the shop to change the oil and swap out glow plugs. But that’s about it.

I once built a model of the Millennium Falcon. But you don’t see me prancing around claiming to be part wookie.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

1. China has the capability to make good its losses in a naval war while we don’t (see my first post on this thread)

technology makes this irrelevant

quote:

2. Even with technology, logistics still is what wins wars. It was our ace in the hole that won WWII and made us the dominant military force in the world for the second half of the 20th century. And as things stand today, we lack the naval logistics capability to sustain a protracted war on the other side of the Pacific against China. I don’t like it. I freaking hate it. But it’s time we as a country admit it and address the problem because it’s not a problem that is a quick fix. China has been gearing up for a war in the South China Sea for decades. It’s time we do the same.



we won't be sending personnel which negates the need to move bodies and supplies due to the changing nature of warfare because of the technology


I win



and the tonnage,
our allies Japan which is growing their fleet.
Our significant advantage in submarines
in addition and perhaps more signifigent is India, and they've been amping up their ability, and the fact we don't need a huge advantage in numbers because we can bottleneck the Chinese fleet at the Malaca strait


bitch
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25947 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:41 pm to
Do we need more capacity?

It so - I’d be pissed if we outsourced Navy shipbuilding to Korea after shutting down Avondale.
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 10:43 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
39330 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:49 pm to
Darth is correct. China’s shipbuilding capacity and their rapidly expanding blue water navy is going to make the USN second rate once they gain more experience with naval air. We don’t have the capacity to catch up with them. We have advantages in technology but they’re stealing it as fast as we come up with it and in some areas they’re advancing faster.

Re-industrializing the U.S. is the #1 priority for national security.


To emphasize, we held the competition to decide what proven design would be used for FFGX in 2018ish. It was supposed to be nearly plug and play. The USN went with the French/Italian FREMM design built by Fincantieri and they would expand their shipyard at Marine Marinette to build these new frigates. The first ship should be rolling off the line next year. So far we have not one keel laid down and haven’t finished constantly changing design parameters including basic shite like hull length.

We are absolutely fricked sideways in naval procurement right now. Every ship design has been massive to moderate failure at least in the short term and we have over a century of experience in operating a blue water navy.
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 10:55 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188537 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

rmnldr
ok Admiral Nimitz

Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
16749 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:09 pm to
Erie, what do you do for a living?
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
45898 posts
Posted on 3/3/25 at 1:17 am to
Ships other than for troop movement are almost obsolete
Posted by Raging Tiger
Teedy Town
Member since Jun 2023
936 posts
Posted on 3/3/25 at 2:37 am to
We are forgetting the biggest thing. They are made in China.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram