- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Waffle House workers are the latest group to strike, requesting $25 per hour
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to AwgustaDawg
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:Well that is totally false, isn't it though. False and very silly.
Production costs have no bearing on market prices in any accepted economic theory
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to glassman
quote:
I don't think, I know it will go up.
You'd be dead wrong. If market price did go up there would be no need to manage costs...you would simply pass them onto the consumer by increasing your price. That is not the way supply and demand works.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Under what assumptions?
So you want me to give you the answer? Its a very simple question.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Obviously an ingredient's cost increase 500% will have no affect on the cost of the product. That's just common sense.
Cost is not market price my friend....
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:47 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I don't think, I know it will go up.
You'd be dead wrong. If market price did go up there would be no need to manage costs...you would simply pass them onto the consumer by increasing your price. That is not the way supply and demand works.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:48 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
You'd be dead wrong. If market price did go up there would be no need to manage costs.
This would only make sense if there was infinite money to be spent and price did not affect consumption.
Again, what fantasy world do you live on?
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:48 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
They literally do.
Once again you have misread your own evidence....
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:48 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
You'd be dead wrong. If market price did go up there would be no need to manage costs...you would simply pass them onto the consumer by increasing your price. That is not the way supply and demand works.
Can't believe I read as many of these posts as I did before realizing you're just fricking with everyone
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:49 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
Cost is not market price my friend....
I honestly don't even have words for this.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:49 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Again, what fantasy world do you live on?
Hes approaching it from a Marxist perspective, a perspective that has never once worked in history.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:49 pm to jchamil
quote:
Can't believe I read as many of these posts as I did before realizing you're just fricking with everyone
I want this to be the case, but this is the level of stupidity required to buy into leftists policies
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:52 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
You'd be dead wrong. If market price did go up there would be no need to manage costs...you would simply pass them onto the consumer by increasing your price. That is not the way supply and demand works.
Oh, cot damn.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:54 pm to TDTOM
quote:
quote:
Yep, no company would ever raise prices, they will just eat the extra production costs
It’s like the last two years never happened.
GREAT example. Inflation is not a function of increased production costs, it is a function of consumers having the disposable income to continue to consume at the same or an increasing rate thus driving demand beyond the capacity of supply.
If production costs of a 2X4 went from $1 to $100 would the market price for that 2X4 remain the same? It would depend on supply and demand, not the cost or production. One would assume that demand would plummet thus lowering the market price and producers would stop producing thus driving market prices back up. If production costs went from $1 to $100 sure no one thinks you would sell just as many 2X4s at an increased market price of 1000% do they??? Surely to god not a soul here today thinks that is sound economic theory???
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:55 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:You are terribly confused with nomenclature.
You'd be dead wrong.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:55 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
disposable income
quote:
last two years
Ok, now your post are just funny.
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:55 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I honestly don't even have words for this.
So please explain how cost and market price and one and the same. I know you do not have the words to do that because no one does....
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:56 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
So please explain how cost and market price and one and the same
Did anyone say that?
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:57 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
So please explain how cost and market price and one and the same.
quote:
I know you do not have the words
Neither do you bud
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:57 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
So please explain how cost and market price and one and the same.
No one is saying that.
Unlike you, theyre saying they have a connection.
This post was edited on 10/3/23 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 10/3/23 at 2:58 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Hard to take you seriously.
Next he will argue that public roads are actually part of production costs.
Popular
Back to top



0


