- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UK Mail: North Korea shows off special forces armed with "grenade launchers"
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:16 pm to PolyPusher86
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:16 pm to PolyPusher86
quote:
Here's a piece of advice, know when you've been defeated.
0
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:23 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Darth... The whole damn thread is about this magazine that you thought was a faux grenade launcher. You're just trying to get a "gotcha" on me. Practice what you preach you hypocritical frick.
Hypocritical frick? That's rich coming from a e-crossdressing peter puffer such as yourself. I admitted my mistake. And yet you still refuse to admit your and instead backtrack and try to change what you said earlier instead of manning up and admitting you were wrong.
You though the North Korean Type 88 was a copy of the Russian PP-19 all because they both have a similar looking magazine. That's why you said the Type 88 was a "knock-off" of the PP-19 instead of saying this magazine was a knock-off. You wanted to look smart and look like you knew something I didn't. Turns out though you don't know shite because you claimed this rifle was a "imitation" of a SMG that wasn't even dreamed of when the Type 88 was introduced.
but keep on crawfishing, parsing, and defecting trying to keep from admitting you were wrong. All you're doing is proving what a worthless little petty bitch you really are.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:24 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I'm not sure why this comes as a surprise to so many, but there are military and historic facts I simply don't know about
Believe me, it doesn't surprise anyone. Ther problem is you constantly act like you're infallible or compete dipshit like in this thread.
Someone gives an example of a helical fed magazine to show you're wrong about the fake grenade launcher position and you latch on to how the weapon is a sub machine gun without knowing that variants of the pp-19 bizon fire larger cartridges
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:26 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Hypocritical frick? That's rich coming from a e-crossdressing peter puffer such as yourself. I admitted my mistake. And yet you still refuse to admit your and instead backtrack and try to change what you said earlier instead of manning up and admitting you were wrong.
You though the North Korean Type 88 was a copy of the Russian PP-19 all because they both have a similar looking magazine. That's why you said the Type 88 was a "knock-off" of the PP-19 instead of saying this magazine was a knock-off. You wanted to look smart and look like you knew something I didn't. Turns out though you don't know shite because you claimed this rifle was a "imitation" of a SMG that wasn't even dreamed of when the Type 88 was introduced.
but keep on crawfishing, parsing, and defecting trying to keep from admitting you were wrong. All you're doing is proving what a worthless little petty bitch you really are.
It's beautiful....
I think I'm going to frame this.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:28 pm to Darth_Vader
Great thread DV. I don't think these other gun experts realize you were in the MP's at FT. Knox and used to wave cars in at the front gate.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:33 pm to Rebel
98% chance he's jacking off right now
ETA: I never even said the Type 88 was a knock off apparently.
it was some other guy
This is what I said:
I thought the Type 88 was a helical magazine rifle. I never even claimed it was a knock-off.
ETA: I never even said the Type 88 was a knock off apparently.
it was some other guy This is what I said:
quote:
Never said it was. People were saying it was the Bizon but it's just the NK helical magazine rifle, the Type 88.
I thought the Type 88 was a helical magazine rifle. I never even claimed it was a knock-off.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:36 pm to jeff5891
quote:
Believe me, it doesn't surprise anyone. Ther problem is you constantly act like you're infallible or compete dipshit like in this thread
horseshite. When I don't know something or I'm wrong about something, I admit it, as I've done over and over in this thread.
quote:
Someone gives an example of a helical fed magazine to show you're wrong about the fake grenade launcher position and you latch on to how the weapon is a sub machine gun without knowing that variants of the pp-19 bizon fire larger cartridges
1. This weapon is not a SMG, I've said that numerious times. I never said it was a SMG
2. This weapon (the type 88) is not a variant of the PP-19 because it predates the PP-19 by almost a full decade.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:37 pm to Darth_Vader
Darth... Find where I said the Type 88 was a knock off of a PP-19
ETA: found it
I meant the one we're talking about with the tube magazine. It's obvious.
But I'll leave Darth to jack off over this. Must feel so great to correct everyone on minute details when your whole thread is incorrect.
ETA: found it
quote:
Because the Type 88 is a knock off of a PP-19 and not an AK-47 with a zip-tied PVC pipe.
I meant the one we're talking about with the tube magazine. It's obvious.
But I'll leave Darth to jack off over this. Must feel so great to correct everyone on minute details when your whole thread is incorrect.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:42 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Darth... Find where I said the Type 88 was a knock off of a PP-19
Here. These are your exact words....
quote:
Because the Type 88 is a knock off of a PP-19 and not an AK-47 with a zip-tied PVC pipe.
That's from Page 8, 5th post from the top of this very thread.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:43 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
But I'll leave Darth to jack off over this. Must feel so great to correct everyone on minute details when your whole thread is incorrect.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:46 pm to rmnldr
quote:
I meant the one we're talking about with the tube magazine. It's obvious.
bullshite. You thought the Type 88 was a copy of the PP-19 because the Koreans have designed a tubular magazine to use on this variant of their Type 88 which has been around since the 1980's. I'd bet money you'd never even heard of the Type 88 before today. Now you're too much of a worm to admit you were wrong.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 4:53 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
bullshite. You thought the Type 88 was a copy of the PP-19 because the Koreans have designed a tubular magazine to use on this variant of their Type 88 which has been around since the 1980's. I'd bet money you'd never even heard of the Type 88 before today. Now you're too much of a worm to admit you were wrong.
Wrong about not knowing the 88 was a copy of the 74? Sure. I didn't know that's what it was called. If that's what you want me to admit I was wrong about then this is pathetic, dude.
These Type 88s are still being made to be knockoffs. They have their stocks off and a completely different magazine style. If you want me to say that they're not knockoffs then you're stupid as hell.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:00 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Darth_Vader
God damn, STFU already. You're like a crazy chick picking on the tiniest thing someone else got wrong because she got called out for saying something really stupid.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:01 pm to rmnldr
You're up, Darth, chop chop.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:02 pm to rmnldr
quote:
Wrong about not knowing the 88 was a copy of the 74? Sure. I didn't know that's what it was called. If that's what you want me to admit I was wrong about then this is pathetic, dude
You say didn't know what a AK-74 was. But then you expect anyone to believe you knew what a Type 88 or PP-19 was?!?
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:03 pm to Merck
quote:
God damn, STFU already. You're like a crazy chick picking on the tiniest thing someone else got wrong because she got called out for saying something really stupid
Feel free to stay the frick out of this thread if it bothers you.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:05 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
You say didn't know what a AK-74 was.
Never said that.
quote:
But then you expect anyone to believe you knew what a Type 88 or PP-19 was?!?
I never said I knew what they were, either.
This is the most pathetic thing I've ever seen from you.
quote:
Feel free to stay the frick out of this thread if it bothers you.
He's pointing out how much of a pestering little bitch you are. I'd take his advice and shut the frick up.
This post was edited on 4/17/17 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:21 pm to rmnldr
This thread needs to be taken out back and shot.
With a type 88 or the pp-19.
With a type 88 or the pp-19.
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:22 pm to CaptainsWafer
what about a pp-19 knock off?
Posted on 4/17/17 at 5:31 pm to Darth_Vader
Darth I have no agenda but you started the thread claiming the rifles had pvc pipe zip tied to mimic grenade launchers.
In doing so, you proved you don't know as much about guns as you think you do.
Why not say, "my bad" and move on?
In doing so, you proved you don't know as much about guns as you think you do.
Why not say, "my bad" and move on?
Page 14 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News