- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tyreek Hill Arrest Footage Released
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:52 am to jizzle6609
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:52 am to jizzle6609
Pretend racism is very meaningful
0
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:54 am to bengalman
quote:
Who was that dipshit at the end of the end video that pulls over in traffic to assist the jackass Hill?
That would be Calais Campbell who is possibly one of the most upstanding nfl players.
The popo fricked this one up.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 8:55 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:Bingo!
What I'm saying is we really don't know what the officer saw.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:19 am to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
What I'm saying is we really don't know what the officer saw.
Bingo!
Since we agree we really don't know what the officer saw, the point(s) of contention is this thread are this:
One side says the officers asked (ordered) him to roll the window down and eventually removed him from the car because of officer safety concerns. The other is saying the police were simply exerting their authority under the guise of officer safety.
If the former is true then why didn't the police do the following:
1). Immediately ask (order) Hill to put his hand where they could see them.
2). Frisk the subject once they had him out of the car to make sure he didn't have a weapon.
3). Conduct a search of the vehicle once they had him out of the car to make sure there wasn't a weapon in the car.
ALL of those things could and should have of been done in this situation if officer safety was truly the primary concern. Instead NONE of those things were done.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 9:26 am
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:25 am to Lonnie Utah
After watching that, it's no surprise police have no respect or trust. Hothead cops handled that wrong top to bottom and escalated the situation.
Posted on 9/12/24 at 2:17 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:It doesn't matter. None of it damn matters.
Since we agree we really don't know what the officer saw, the point(s) of contention is this thread are this:
One side says the officers asked (ordered) him to roll the window down and eventually removed him from the car because of officer safety concerns. The other is saying the police were simply exerting their authority under the guise of officer safety.
If the former is true then why didn't the police do the following:
1). Immediately ask (order) Hill to put his hand where they could see them.
2). Frisk the subject once they had him out of the car to make sure he didn't have a weapon.
3). Conduct a search of the vehicle once they had him out of the car to make sure there wasn't a weapon in the car.
ALL of those things could and should have of been done in this situation if officer safety was truly the primary concern. Instead NONE of those things were done.
What matters is that a directive was given by the officer and that it wasn't followed. Period.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 9/12/24 at 2:39 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
What matters is that a directive was given by the officer and that it wasn't followed. Period.
It 100% matter in the scope of Penn vs Mimms. It matters because officers are only allowed to remove a suspect from their car to frisk them in the name officer safety. They can ask the subject to exit their vehicle so they can check them for weapons if they reasonably suspect the person is a threat to their safety.
If officer safety isn't a concern, then removing them from the car and handcuffing them is an illegal detention.
So the details 100% matter.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 9/12/24 at 9:01 pm to jizzle6609
Can’t believe this thread is still going on. And this was only one of many on TD.
ETA: shite, my bad for bumping; my phone browser didn’t refresh. Ban me.
ETA: shite, my bad for bumping; my phone browser didn’t refresh. Ban me.
This post was edited on 9/12/24 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 9/13/24 at 8:48 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:LOL. Weren't you the one accusing me of conjecture. Well, meet conjecture.
It 100% matter in the scope of Penn vs Mimms. It matters because officers are only allowed to remove a suspect from their car to frisk them in the name officer safety. They can ask the subject to exit their vehicle so they can check them for weapons if they reasonably suspect the person is a threat to their safety.
If officer safety isn't a concern, then removing them from the car and handcuffing them is an illegal detention.
So the details 100% matter.
Page 37 of 37
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News