Started By
Message

re: Transition team failed to release all of St. George "suggestions"

Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Did Central have to get the legislature's approval when it formed its own city?


Nope. The short description of the process, to the best of my knowledge, is as follows.

1) Any unincorporated part of the state with at least 200 people may petition for incorporation. No permission is required from any government body or official, nor is there anything they can do to stop a proper and legal petition for incorporation. The people do what they will.
2) The people who want to incorporate form a committee, prepare an outline of the area they want to incorporate and the people that live there, propose a name for the city, select chairpersons, draw up plans for public services, compile property values in the area, etc. in order to put together all of the information required by law in a formal petition for incorporation.
3) Then they release it for public scrutiny and begin canvassing the people who live in the area proposed for incorporation to get signatures.
4) Once they think they have the signatures of 25% of the people who would live in the new city, they submit that petition with the signatures to the Parish Clerk of Court who validates that the signatures are of people who would live in the new city and verifies whether or not the petition did get the required 25%.
5) If enough signatures are there, the petition for incorporation and the validation from the Clerk of Court is sent to the Governor who verifies that the petition meets all the requirements that the law stipulates must be present in a valid petition for incorporation.
6) If the petition is in order and the Clerk of Court has validated the signatures, the governor must call a special election for the people who live in the area that would be the proposed new city. If 50% plus one of the people who would be residents of the new city vote to form the city, a municipal corporation for the new city is granted and the city is born.

There is almost nothing other than propaganda that people who live outside the proposed new city can do to stop the process or affect the election; it's all up to the people who would be living in the new city. Of course, there's always the possibility that Baton Rouge could propose to annex chunks of what would be St. George, but they'd have to get the people that live in those chunks to agree to be annexed instead of form a new city. They did this with the Mall and Celtic Studios the last time around.

Other than stuff like that, the government's role in the process is only to write the laws that lay out how the process works and verify that the law is being followed. If the people in an area want a city, the people get a city.
This post was edited on 3/17/17 at 12:31 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43056 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:19 pm to
No and neither does SG.

But Central did get the legislature to permit their ISD
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43056 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:20 pm to
70% white whereas the parish is 50% white

Not a ton of difference, but some.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:25 pm to
Going from 50% to 70% hardly justifies that popular argument.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
56580 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Tell that to the Mayor, and her transition team.

They are the ones discussing how racists things are and how we have to stop St. George.


She's a customer of mine and continues to be, even after moving to St. George.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:30 pm to
Both sides in this St. George incorporation suck.

Blow up the EBRPSS into smaller districts, give St. George what they want, and deserve. Don't go through the asinine process of incorporation.

Once again the state legislature screwing things up.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43056 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:31 pm to
You moved to SG or she did?
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:42 pm to
Her house flooded. Guess she may have relocated. I can't remember off hand if Senate District 15 had any overlap with St.G
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
131095 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Guess she may have relocated.

I believe it was to some relative's house. It was definitely somewhere in the southeast portion of the parish.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43056 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 12:48 pm to
Looking at s map it's possible there is a very slight overlap.

Don't know why she didn't move to NBR and help redevelopment efforts.

;-)
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 1:25 pm to
If this was a committee formed by the mayor then everything should be transparent. They need to release any documents they have.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram