- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:45 pm to novabill
For $800k when you and your passenger's stories don't line up and the drug dogs hit, yes.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:45 pm to LNCHBOX
If you have 800k, why would they leave Mississippi? That is like 1.5 million in Texas.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:46 pm to novabill
quote:
Do we now NEED an explanation for our money? Is that what you are advocating?
Exactly, municipalities in East Texas have grabbed just a couple of hundred at a time. People given a receipt to come back to court at a different time to explain why it's there money. I'ts bullshite
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:46 pm to Walking the Earth
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:46 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
For $800k when you and your passenger's stories don't line up and the drug dogs hit, yes.
Why? This is America.
The state should not be able to take my money because they think I may have gotten it illegally.
If you do not see a problem with this, you must be getting some benefit from this type of theft.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:48 pm to novabill
quote:
If you do not see a problem with this, you must be getting some benefit from this type of theft.
Yea, it absolutely must be this way.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:49 pm to chalupa
quote:
He said no to a search, so they got the K9. The K9 hit on illegal narcotics, so they searched. No narcotics. The trainers can obviously make their K9 "hit" on anything.
Don't kid yourself, the dog hit on the cash.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:49 pm to LNCHBOX
Well if there's no evidence of drugs, then what are we doing? Using assumptions?
Yeah, the guys probably are drug dealers and frick them, but if justice is gonna be just and not wrong, it can't take a vacation or look the other way in some situations. Because then it's something that resembles Justice but is not. And everyone charged with preserving it knows it's not, and the world just gets uglier anyway.
Yeah, the guys probably are drug dealers and frick them, but if justice is gonna be just and not wrong, it can't take a vacation or look the other way in some situations. Because then it's something that resembles Justice but is not. And everyone charged with preserving it knows it's not, and the world just gets uglier anyway.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:49 pm to novabill
The law is used by the federal agencies to essentially seize all assets from someone and render them incapable of paying for defending the charges. They are then forced into copping a deal because of it under very disadvantageous terms.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:50 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:
Well if there's no evidence of drugs, then what are we doing? Using assumptions?
Yea. If you're honest you make the same assumption.
quote:
Yeah, the guys probably are drug dealers and frick them
Look at that. I was right.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:52 pm to LNCHBOX
I don't give a flying frick if it is a drug dealer with 800k.
It is his money. Not the cops.
Yes I would feel different if it was stolen money. However I have no problem with someone making money selling drugs. They are filling a need in a marketplace and that's it.
It is his money. Not the cops.
Yes I would feel different if it was stolen money. However I have no problem with someone making money selling drugs. They are filling a need in a marketplace and that's it.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:52 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX
Thinks that cops should be able take your stuff because you might be a drug dealer. Next it will be ok to take your stuff because you might be a.......?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:52 pm to Jim Rockford
The dude is likely guilty of some crime, but this "open air" bullshite test with the dogs is a huge issue of mine. It's entirely plausible that the retard cops just have the dog hit on whatever they tell it to. It's an illegal way to get what they want, but of course it's still used often. It's only fitting that no drugs were found in the vehicle.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:52 pm to PrivatePublic
The dog alerted b/c Jethro told him to.
Police dogs are notoriously unreliable and any decent attorney, even USMCTiger03, can prove this.
()
Police dogs are notoriously unreliable and any decent attorney, even USMCTiger03, can prove this.
(
)Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:53 pm to LNCHBOX
Shut the frick up you fat, stupid cop.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:54 pm to VetteGuy
quote:
Police dogs are notoriously unreliable
Link to studies showing that highly trained canines are unreliable?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:54 pm to LNCHBOX
So you're not for justice.
Okay.
Got it.
Carry on.
Okay.
Got it.
Carry on.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:56 pm to USMCTiger03
Justice to me is drug dealers not making money for their crimes and having their untaxed assets siezed. This is money that tax dollars don't have to be spent on now. If think tall would be for such things.
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 6:58 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 6:56 pm to VetteGuy
Nice one.
Page 3 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News