- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:49 pm to Sweep Da Leg
You can guide its sources. And double check its work.
Don't trust it to tell you something if you can't speak on that thing yourself. I'm working on rules for AI for my team and that is the second one.
Eta
Just for clarity everything i say it can do is based on the professional paid versions, not the Twitter troll fact check version.
Don't trust it to tell you something if you can't speak on that thing yourself. I'm working on rules for AI for my team and that is the second one.
Eta
Just for clarity everything i say it can do is based on the professional paid versions, not the Twitter troll fact check version.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:59 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
At some point, though, AI will have an encyclopedic knowledge of every law, every case, every appeal, every outcome for every state, district, municipal and federal decision. It will still need to be double checked, but the more and more it gets refined the more close it becomes to being able to offer solid legal advice.
My experience is it just condenses laws. It will give you a convincing summary, but it doesn’t catch applicable qualifications and exceptions that exist further into a statute.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:11 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
You bring a lot of useless shite from Twitter to here
Thank you for your attention to this matter
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:29 pm to lsuconnman
quote:Doesn't or you didn't prompt it to in your directive? I've found that to get a detailed, correct answer on a complicated matter requires me writing a very detailed ask.
My experience is it just condenses laws. It will give you a convincing summary, but it doesn’t catch applicable qualifications and exceptions that exist further into a statute.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 11:44 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Thank you for your attention to this matter
No problem. It looks I’m not the only person who’s noticed.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:02 am to cubsfan5150
If other sites could be embedded here X wouldn’t be used as much
And this is the place for off topic topics. No need for topic police. Go be a Karen elsewhere
And this is the place for off topic topics. No need for topic police. Go be a Karen elsewhere
Popular
Back to top

0









