Started By
Message

re: The west is the south

Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:46 pm to
California was a Republican state until pretty recently.

Ronald Reagan was the governor.

Los Angeles was not that long ago a pretty small place. It became a colony of northeastern and midwestern people.

It is likely there are now more WASP Anglos that descend from puritans out west than there are in the northeast. The northeast got invaded by European immigrants.

(We southerners do not descend from puritans)

But it wasn’t always like that. California used to be western frontier, and was settled by many southerners, the first ones took rich Hispanic wives to marry into the local hispanic elite
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
14021 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Yep, it is a sad reality. Even in Texas which is where I have always lived the southern influence has waned in my short lifetime. I am sure it was a lot more southern when my father was growing up.

I would like to live somewhere that I can be proud to be a southerner, where the confederacy isn’t shamed, and where people get along and it is a nice place to live. I know there are many out there but they are diminishing. Always have been I guess.

Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana make up a different kinda south than states like Virginia, the Carolina’s, Georgia. And then Alabama and Mississippi and Tennessee are sort of the middle ground. But we are all more or less the same people, and we have more in common than we do w/ the rest of the country.

And it seems that where we come from plays a big part in who we are. We are fundamentally a different people than northerners in a way. The puritans, their descendants, and then all of the European immigrants they brought in and in a way washed a lot of their culture away. The south never got so many immigrants, except in certain places, and they still kind of blended in rather than making a completely new thing.


If Texas and Oklahoma are the south, and not saying they ain't, at least half of Indiana, Ohio and Illinois is. This is especially true if Missouri is the south and it certainly is sort of the south....
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:47 pm to
It’s true, it took a while but you can go to the hill country and it is still pretty southern despite all of the German immigrants.

Is southern Louisiana not southern?

The parts of Virginia that got Germans was so long ago they have blended in with the Anglo stock that surrounds them.

The Texans Germans this is not as much the case but still is to a large extent.

Most Texas Germans likely also descend from confederate veterans. Younger ones at least!
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39509 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

It is no accident that the most famous Western novel, written by a Pennsylvanian, Owen Wister, and set in Wyoming, was called The Virginian;


I take umbarge to that opinion, sir.

Lonesome Dove says hold my beer, and my Spencer rifle.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:49 pm to
Sadly the KKK (and the worst iteration of it) was very prominent in Indiana and they were settled by the same sort of Anglo stock although there were also other groups that gave it more of a blend. I think you have to draw the line somewhere. Missouri is not fully southern but maybe half or moreso. Indiana and Illinois maybe 25% if that. Indiana probably slightly more so I guess.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48727 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:50 pm to
you're (perhaps deliberately?) omitting the 4 million+ forced immigrants to the south
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:52 pm to
They are also southern. I’m not sure what your point is.

Many of them also worked as cowboys back in those days. There were more blacks in west Texas than Hispanics in the late 19th century.

Black people certainly influence the south in places they were prominent (which wasn’t quite all of them)

Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:54 pm to
The Pattons came to California from Virginia.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:55 pm to
The black people stopped arriving in ships before the Germans and Irish came in the mid 19th century.

That was the first wave that changed America. They didn’t quite come as much to the south.

They also made sure the north won the civil war.

I don’t consider the black people brought here as immigrants. That is “native” American stock. Just like the scots Irish, the Anglo cavaliers and puritans, indentured servants (which is who most true southerners descend from in reality), the injuns, the Tejanos, the cajuns, Huguenots, some Germans and Irish that came in much smaller waves prior to then.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 2:56 pm
Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
2142 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

California was a Republican state until pretty recently.

Ronald Reagan was the governor.

Los Angeles was not that long ago a pretty small place. It became a colony of northeastern and midwestern people.

It is likely there are now more WASP Anglos that descend from puritans out west than there are in the northeast. The northeast got invaded by European immigrants.

(We southerners do not descend from puritans)

But it wasn’t always like that. California used to be western frontier, and was settled by many southerners, the first ones took rich Hispanic wives to marry into the local hispanic elite

A lot to unpack here.

1) California being Republican until recently makes it "less Southern". Whether you think highly of the South or not, its connection with Republicans is less than 20 years old.

2) Most African-Americans in California are descended from those who left Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, etc. during the Depression.

3) Not many other connections to draw between West Coast and the old South.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48727 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

They are also southern.

they were african, mostly west african. they became "southern" merely due to the fact that they were residents of the south, and yes their culture greatly influenced what (much later) became "southern" culture. your assertion that the south is somehow more culturally intact due to fewer immigrants that the north is patently absurd.

quote:

I’m not sure what your point is.

back at you
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

take umbarge to that opinion, sir.

Lonesome Dove says hold my beer, and my Spencer rifle.


LD is up there, but The Virginian is regarded as the progenitor of all modern Western novels, including LD. For lack of a better term, it is the grandpappy of all Westerns.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:59 pm to
By recently I just meant from the 60s to the 80s, which is when the south was also becoming Republican.

They were Republican before the south, which does show it was likely settled by a lot of non southerners a long time ago. But many still came there, and parts of the state were certainly more southern as others. As a whole it probably was never really southern in the same way New Mexico and Texas and Oklahoma were.

I actually don’t think Arizona was ever really southern like those places either!


And even in Texas it depends. The anglo people who settled the Rio grande valley, for instance, were mostly Midwest, so they have a less southern feel than even Laredo does.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39509 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:59 pm to
I'll definitely read it.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 2:59 pm to
Have you ever heard of the Oakies?

Merle haggard was from California.
Posted by TriStateAreaFootball
Member since Dec 2024
2142 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

By recently I just meant from the 60s to the 80s, which is when the south was also becoming Republican.

You have been misled, my friend. The Southern Strategy is a political tool to undermine the current Republican Party. It is a lie. The Democratic Party and the South are inextricably linked going back to the party's founding.



For example - The state legislature of Mississippi did not flip to Republican until 2008.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:01 pm to
The south got less immigrants from the mid 19th century on than the rest of the country. Just Google it. This is a well known fact that everybody should know.

It is why the south has the highest percentage of British ancestry as a whole, even more than New England does.


We are descended from colonial Americans at a much higher rate than northerners and westerners.


People from the “true south” even more so than Texas but what I have found is that most Texans seem to descend from confederates. If they are generational Texans.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:02 pm to
I already know that. I don’t much like the modern Republican Party either. I wish we could take back the Democrat party but there is no shot.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7534 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:03 pm to
How is the southern strategy a lie? All of our ancestors were democrats until the 1960s.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 3/27/25 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

I'll definitely read it.


Bonus: Diane Lane of course starred in the LD miniseries, but she also starred in the latest television adaptation of The Virginian.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram