- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"The Spark"of Female Mythology Does Not Exist. It's just being DTF.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:49 am
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:49 am
Science
i used to argue this point strongly many years ago. TAKE THAT, BEANS
quote:
When you see somebody for the first time, your brain fires off so many synapses and your senses process so much information in an instant that you basically know whether you're attracted to somebody in just seconds. Ted-Ed explains the science behind this and it all boils down to which mate has better reproductive qualities for your future offspring, or better put, who you want to bone.
i used to argue this point strongly many years ago. TAKE THAT, BEANS
9
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:51 am to SlowFlowPro
way to relive this thread AGAIN.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:53 am to LSUgirl4
when science proves me right, i will gloat
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
I love that no matter what scientist say they're alawsys right.... At least until they figure out they're not.
All they've got to do is spout anything, say they figured it in a "study" and it's gospel truth.
All they've got to do is spout anything, say they figured it in a "study" and it's gospel truth.
This post was edited on 5/9/14 at 8:58 am
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it all boils down to which mate has better reproductive qualities for your future offspring, or better put, who you want to bone
No shite
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:00 am to Darth_Vader
that is (simply put) how the scientific method works.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:02 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
All they've got to do is spout anything, say they figured it in a "study" and it's gospel truth.
if they have evidence to support it then they can make the claim.
without evidence, all you have is basically religion
-relax, im kidding.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:12 am to Displaced
quote:
if they have evidence to support it then they can make the claim. without evidence, all you have is basically religion
And that's the thing. What they call evidence is quite subjective in many cases.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Does anyone know what "formant spacing" means in terms of vocals?
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
It's all about phermones and reproductive compatibility. Our noses pretty much determine who we bone.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:16 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I love that no matter what scientist say they're alawsys right.... At least until they figure out they're not.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:16 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
And that's the thing. What they call evidence is quite subjective in many cases.
that is the thing about the method though.
they put their results out there for others to repeat their experiments and either confirm or disprove their results.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:18 am to Darth_Vader
quote:link?
And that's the thing. What they call evidence is quite subjective in many cases.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:30 am to Spirit of Dunson
I'm on my iPhone so you've got to do your own homework. But I'll at least give you on prime example. About 40 years ago scientist were convinced we were heading to a new ice age. They had irrefutable proof this was coming. They even had Time magazine do a special issue on the impeding frozen wasteland that was to be our world. Fast forward 40 years and now it's the exact opposite and once again they've got the proof.
Time and again we see scientists make this claim or that claim and as soon As people see that word "study" attached to it, they accept whatever they're being told as though Moses himself brought down the news from the mount on high.
Time and again we see scientists make this claim or that claim and as soon As people see that word "study" attached to it, they accept whatever they're being told as though Moses himself brought down the news from the mount on high.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:41 am to Displaced
quote:
if they have evidence to support it then they can make the claim.
Sort of. Not really.
quote:
they put their results out there for others to repeat their experiments and either confirm or disprove their results.
And that's why not really. Most things remain a theory of some sort even if they are incredibly likely to be true. Darth's preception as scientific theories being represented "gospel truth" is where his concept goes wrong. There's simply evidence to believe that something is the most likely explanation. If new evidence comes along, it's time to reinterpret the explanation.
Only basic scientific principles are viewed as "gospel truth." And of course the gospel by some people.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and it all boils down to which mate has better reproductive qualities for your future offspring, or better put, who you want to bone.
Well no fricking shite. I hope they didn't spend too much time researching this one.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:46 am to Peazey
quote:
And that's why not really. Most things remain a theory of some sort even if they are incredibly likely to be true. Darth's preception as scientific theories being represented "gospel truth" is where his concept goes wrong. There's simply evidence to believe that something is the most likely explanation. If new evidence comes along, it's time to reinterpret the explanation. Only basic scientific principles are viewed as "gospel truth." And of course the gospel by some people.
That sounds good and agree it's supposed to go that way. but considering how the global warming/climate change debate has gone it's patently obvious things don't actually work that way.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:47 am to Darth_Vader
that is a lot of media hype there too, and let's not forget politicians talking out of their arse to support their agenda.
This post was edited on 5/9/14 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:48 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
Well no fricking shite. I hope they didn't spend too much time researching this one.
but girls SWEAR it's not about sex
it's just, you know, "the spark"
it's not explainable. you can't think too hard about it. not everything in life can be defined.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 9:48 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Time and again we see scientists make this claim or that claim and as soon As people see that word "study" attached to it, they accept whatever they're being told as though Moses himself brought down the news from the mount on high.
So who don't you like? The scientists or the people who claim studies are truth. In your first post you went after the scientist making the claim, but in this one you seem to dislike the people. Or is it both?
Scientists have to defend their publications til they either prove their point or it is refuted. That's part of their jobs and the reason they research things.
Can't help you with the people, people believe a lot of dumb shite.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News