re: The Dinosaur Soft Tissue Problem (Videos)

Irrefutable proof. Apparently we interbred as well

quote:

---

I don't think the age of the earth needs to be addressed.

---

quote:

---

But I have a feeling that's exactly what the OP wants to address.

---

Dinosaur Soft Tissue addresses the age of dinosaurs directly. Ultimately, that's what this is about. This is a case of scientist not believing their eyes, what they actually see (observe). Dinosaur soft tissue didn't exist as a possibility in scientists minds until Mary found some, and she found it my mistake. And when she retested and published her results, they were calling BS. They would have bet their mama's life you wouldn't find soft tissue in "fossilised" dinosaur bone. They never questioned their belief that "you don't find soft tissue in dinosaur fossils millions of years old," so they never looked.

But since it is proven true, they are looking for reasonable explanations for tissue lasting millions of years. They just can't accept the simple explanation that dinosaurs ain't as old as they think. This real evidence openly flaunts their worldview. So instead of questioning their accepted bs time frame, they are questioning their eyes and common sense.

What I find funny, interesting and sad is how fossils are dated. They say "Fossils themselves, and the sedimentary rocks they are found in, are very difficult to date directly. Instead, other methods are used to work out a fossil's age. These include radiometric dating of volcanic layers above or below the fossils or by comparisons to similar rocks and fossils of known ages."

They date the rocks, not the fossil. But Fossils are primarily found in sedimentary rocks and sedimentary rocks aren't they rocks they use for dating. So in order to date most older fossils (older than 50,000 years), scientists look for layers of igneous rock or volcanic ash above and below the fossil.

But now they have actual dinosaur soft tissue, where they can use Carbon 14 dating. They can now date the actual dinosaur bone instead of some nearby igneous rock that the "fossil" isn't even buried in!

And when they do Carbon 14 dating, the dates are coming back with 10 of thousands years, not millions! If the tissue was millions of years old, it wouldn't have Carbon 14 still in it!