- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/16/22 at 10:40 am to riverdiver
quote:
Which office was “shot up”, and what kind of weapon was used?

Posted on 8/16/22 at 10:43 am to OweO
quote:
Why is it a bad thing to take extra safety precautions?
You know what would be safest, taking all political dissidents that don’t agree with the current regime and putting them into camps.
You know, for extra safety.
If your legs worked you’d be goose stepping you greasy piece of cripple shite.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 10:46 am to Barbellthor
quote:
If you are consistent: 1) you'll understand the difference between President Trump being president who has access to and the ability to declassify previously classified information, whereas Hillary was just a bureaucrat who affirmatively exposed sensitive information to the world before not cooperating by suspiciously bleach washing all her stuff, and 2) you'd be at the forefront calling for accountability on the despotic people and entities daring to raid the recent president's home for less of a crime than you believe Hillary didn't commit.
In both cases, the level of classification(or lack thereof) is immaterial. A president is not above the law, he is not a king or dictator, no matter how much some of you all try and project that level of power onto him, or "whatabout" on his behalf to defend him from allegations of impropriety.
The laws being cited under the warrant and in this investigation are not dependent on the classification level of the documents. Though as I mentioned, there are laws, like the one Trump signed, that could be added into the equation that do specifically talk about classified documents.
The Espionage Act
18 U.S. Code § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
And once again, I have no problem calling what Hillary did improper, and I have no problem saying she should be investigated. Just like I have no problem with Trump being investigated, or for investigating those like Jared Kushner that also were transferring classified information through private, non-sanctioned servers and apps
Where Trump is fricking up is the potential claim that his lawyers stated they returned everything, but clearly didn't. Still think it is unlikely he gets charged with anything, unless there is some serious smoking gun evidence that he tried to do something like sell them off or allow improper access to the documents.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 10:57 am
Posted on 8/16/22 at 10:49 am to Centinel
I tried to tell you people five pages ago.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 10:51 am
Posted on 8/16/22 at 11:07 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
I'm not yelling. You're a certified nut. I don't think anyone here will debate that.
Have fun, now.
Too be honest, both of yall are certified.
There is outrage because FBI HQ in DC put temporary barriers around it. Think about that for a second. Why would that really bother anyone? How does that impact you?
If you were a reasonable thinker I would think you would understand why they would take extra precaution. Is it likely anyone would go there and try to do something? No. Is it possible? Yes.
It could happen at anytime, but do you honestly believe the odds don't go up a little bit with the Trump situation? Especially since some retard tried to enter the FBI office in Cincinnati with an AR15 and a nail gun.
While his motive is unknown he had been known to the FBI for an unspecified connection to Jan 6, 21.
This thread is blowing up because the FBI HQ in DC put up temp barriers. Again, just think about that.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 11:11 am to OweO
quote:
There is outrage because FBI HQ in DC put temporary barriers around it. Think about that for a second. Why would that really bother anyone? How does that impact you?
Barriers are ok to keep people out of businesses, public buildings, communities etc but not along our border...that is why some people have an issue with crap like this
Back to top

0





