Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Spinoff: Why can't we peg down the definition/timeframe of Millennial?

Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:19 pm
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:19 pm
Why can't we peg down the "Millennial" definition? I am 34, and WORLDS away different (born in 1983) than someone who is 21 right now, hell even 24, that puts them born on 1997-2000

We have totally separate childhoods and teen years, hell I in high school WHEN THEY WERE BORN at the end of that spectrum.

Grouping people at the cutoff (1983) being the same generation gap as people born in 1997-2000 is blasphemous.

I've seen articles saying I'm late Gen-X, to Millennial, to an entire stopgap new generation (the nintendo generation) Why is this so difficult to agree on?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:20 pm to
We did. It’s 1981 to about 1996. People saying otherwise are not in agreement with the majority opinion.

Although it should be late 80s early 90s to end. The term millennial means people who came of age in the turn of new millennium. They use 9/11 as a specific event that shaped the generation. Someone in 1992-1996 never really knew what was going on at age 5-7 on 9/11.
This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 3:23 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86711 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:20 pm to
because old people are lazy and its easy to just label everyone younger than you as the same group
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88339 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:21 pm to
Because it's a (gender) fluid situation
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

We did. It’s 1981 to about 1996. People saying otherwise are not in agreement with the majority opinion.


If you took someone in a time machine from 1981 to 1996 they would think we were on another planet.
This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 3:24 pm
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
78665 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:22 pm to
1977 - 1983 is now considered their own generation. It’s been labeled as “xillenial”.
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:23 pm to
Xennial. Lemme find the article.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:23 pm to
I know, generations are stupid.
Posted by Diary Queen
Member since Jul 2017
1402 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:23 pm to
There used to be Gen Y. Then millenials were named because of the new millenia (2000).
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

1977 - 1983 is now considered their own generation. It’s been labeled as “xillenial”.


I hope this is a thing, because this is what needs to happen. I guess I never saw that.

Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by Rox
Member since Oct 2010
33333 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:25 pm to
Link to Business Insider Article

Pretty much pegs it as 1977-1985, but I was born in 86 and def identify more with the Xennial stuff over Millenial stuff.

Edit: this isn't the good article that I had read a couple months back. I'll have to try and track that one down.

Found it: https://wokesloth.com/if-you-were-born-between-1977-1985-youre-not-a-millennial-anymore-youre-an-xennial/distributor/
This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 3:28 pm
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

someone who is 21 right now, hell even 24, that puts them born on 1997-2000


lmao
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14794 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:35 pm to
I thought a generation was typically 20 years, but I am an old fart, so don’t listen to me.
Posted by Coach Buzzcut
Member since Feb 2016
1406 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:36 pm to
I thought it was kids who graduate HS in 2000 born in ‘81-82 and then ending with kids born in ‘95-96
Posted by Jackie Chan
Japan?
Member since Sep 2012
4938 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:39 pm to
I was born in 85. I prefer to think of myself as a member of the Saturday morning (and afternoon) cartoon generation.












Posted by Rayburn8
Member since Jun 2014
1717 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 3:48 pm to
Probably around the 96-97 range is the end.

I was born in 97, my sister in 2001.

We had drastically different cultures growing up, she got a smartphone 7th-8th grade I did not get a phone at all till my sophomore year of HS and it was a brick phone. The amount that four years made as far as how kids were and acted was a crazy difference.

There were still good cartoons when I was growing up, those cartoons had faded out into garbage by the time my sister got to them.

It should be defined as people who can remember 9/11 and those who can not.

I can remember the day and getting out of school and my dad cussing out the TV but did not really know the impact beyond it was something really bad.


This post was edited on 7/23/18 at 3:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram