- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Son of former La. supreme court justice sentenced for sex trafficking 12 year old
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:29 pm to MrLSU
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:29 pm to MrLSU
Too add insult to injury, there's a white baw wearing a dashiki in that picture. The cultural appropriation is rich in that picture.
Slavery is bad.
Slavery is bad.
0
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:29 pm to xiv
quote:
Willing =/= consent
They mean the same thing
quote:
Probably just means that the victim cooperated with the crime, not “aggravated” per s
I find it ironic you say she was a willing participant and also call her a victim in the same sentence
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:42 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
I find it ironic you say she was a willing participant and also call her a victim in the same sentence
I specifically noted that what I was trying to say was that she was not kidnapped and forced to do this against her will. She is 100% a victim. My point is the punishment for the perp is different for a victim that goes along with the crime (vs running away) compared to a kidnapped girl tied up in a dungeon
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:46 pm to redneck
quote:
specifically noted that what I was trying to say was that she was not kidnapped and forced to do this against her will. She is 100% a victim. My point is the punishment for the perp is different for a victim that goes along with the crime (vs running away) compared to a kidnapped girl tied up in a dungeon
I think that line has been crossed either scenario when talking about pimping out pre teens and that line should be the difference between life and the death penalty and not 5 or 10 years
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:48 pm to wildtigercat93
It’s pretty easy to understand.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:50 pm to xiv
Also pretty easy to understand that a 14 year old has no ability to be a willing participant as a prostitute
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:51 pm to redneck
quote:It’s clear to us non-retarded people that you meant to convey the idea that the victim was more like “sounds like a great idea, when do I start” rather than dragged into it kicking and screaming, and that that may factor into sentencing.
I specifically noted that what I was trying to say was that she was not kidnapped and forced to do this against her will. She is 100% a victim. My point is the punishment for the perp is different for a victim that goes along with the crime (vs running away) compared to a kidnapped girl tied up in a dungeon
Not that I know whether that’s how cases like that work, but it’s clear that that’s what you are speculating.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:52 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Also pretty easy to understand that a 14 year old has no ability to be a willing participant as a prostitute
He started this crap when she WAS 12 YEARS OLD!
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:52 pm to xiv
quote:
It’s clear to us non-retarded people that you meant to convey the idea that the victim was more like “sounds like a great idea, when do I start” rather than dragged into it kicking and screaming, and that that may factor into sentencing.
Either scenario the sentencing should not start or finish at 10 years.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:54 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
They mean the same thing
No they don't. Consent is a legal term. "Willing" is an emotional state, at best.
Now, I'm the first person to walk cats back who want to fry a 21-year old for getting with a girl 16 years and 10 months, but this is some sick, indefensible shite.
I mean, if the parents are okay with it a 30-year old could marry a 16-year old under some circumstances.
But this was a 14-year old girl that he may have targeted when she was 12 and he was pimping her out.
Fry him.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:57 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
they don't. Consent is a legal term. "Willing" is an emotional state, at best.
In this scenario, the kid doesn’t have the right to give either, regardless of actions
Posted on 8/8/19 at 2:57 pm to redneck
quote:
Assuming the girl was a willing participant (I know I know she was 12-14 ...
Let me give you a tip, to be of service.
If you have a buddy who calls or texts and says something like:
"Dude, I know this sounds creepy but, I met this 14 year old girl who loves to have sex and she will be overjoyed to have sex with you and your friends for a couple of bucks. Don't tell anyone."
Your next call, immediately after hanging up the phone, should be to the police.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 3:00 pm to redneck
As if the willingness of the 14 year old to prostitute herself should lessen the severity of the crime. What is wrong with you?
Posted on 8/8/19 at 3:02 pm to redneck
12 years old, bro? Are you serious?
Posted on 8/8/19 at 3:04 pm to threeputtforbogie
quote:
As if the willingness of the 14 year old to prostitute herself should lessen the severity of the crime. What is wrong with you?
I'm sure the 12-14 year old really willing to prostitute herself out for money for which she received none of the proceeds.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 3:06 pm to MrLSU
Yea his assumption of her willingness is probably the creepiest part of his post. You're a weird dude redneck.
Posted on 8/8/19 at 3:08 pm to threeputtforbogie
Redneck seems a little lenient on the sentencing for my money, but the word “aggravated” can tack a few years on, and it isn’t being used in this case, it seems.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News