Started By
Message

re: So Idiocracy really is a documentary

Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

there are plenty of things that are forced.


Way too many. Are you using that as justification for more?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

And if they don’t?


What has happened since the beginning of humanity?

Utopianism is dumb. Most harm to this world has been done under the push for utopia.

This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:10 pm
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:10 pm to
Bro, even the Neanderthals cared for the sick and it is not an “archaic tribal alliance “, it’s basic “human” decency. Caring for those that can’t care for themselves doesn’t dumb down anything.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:10 pm to
Lots of really bad things that we are fortunately going away from
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Bro, even the Neanderthals cared for the sick


No one said otherwise. Most of the time, it was family.

You clearly don't understand individualism.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:11 pm
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:15 pm to
And yes way too many things are forced. People put in cages for smoking a plant, an adult selling themself for sex, etc etc. But forcing society to help an elderly person that can’t work is not bad.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

. But forcing society to help an elderly person that can’t work is not bad.


If we were just supporting elderly, most wouldn't care too much.

But the more you do, the more dependent they will be. You just cannot understand that.
That's how you destroy resources, money, initiative...
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:19 pm
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
60840 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

But forcing society to help an elderly person that can’t work is not bad.


I really don’t think it would have to be forced in this scenario. Your Neanderthal example seems to show this.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54672 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

The whole point of society is largely to thwart natural selection. The byproducts of this paradigm lead to unequal distributions of labor and financial outcomes by valuing different genetic traits than in the state of nature. This is something people of intelligence in middle school understand.


And women don’t like that at all
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Lots of really bad things that we are fortunately going away from


Including collectivism, which is the primary reason for mass violence.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:23 pm to
I doubt Neanderthals had the societal structure to mandate such a thing. But they still showed it in some cases(probably not all). We should be better than them.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77158 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

But forcing society to help an elderly person that can’t work is not bad.
Well, that isn’t the issue here.

You keep using the elderly as the sole reason.

You are also forcing me to pay for the lifestyles of millions of people who have multitudes of children they can’t afford, live lifestyles which contribute nothing to the collective, and give nothing back, all while I am saving and putting off children because I can’t afford it.

Stop using the worst case scenarios while avoiding the biggest issues involved with welfare.

All while those on welfare live lavish lives compared to the rest of the “global collective”.

You incentivize this.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:27 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

I doubt Neanderthals had the societal structure to mandate such a thing


Then why did you use them as an example of how collective they were?
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
32143 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Is it really? There was a thread I was posting in yesterday where a guy said “blackies commit all the crime”. So please spare me



Now you're just lying. I read that thread. The poster accurately stated that murders in this country are disproportionately committed by black people. His tone was off-putting but hus statement was not false.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:28 pm to
Because it showed even primitive beings cared for people that couldn’t contribute. It wasn’t just,” Darwin, every man for himself” as you seem to support.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23852 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:29 pm to

We’re so far up the food chain, with no predators and no environmental threats* for 99.999% of the human population, that natural selection doesn’t apply in the same way it applies to gazelles.

The 2 traits I can think of offhand that increase odds of success in the modern world are logical and social intelligence. For a very small percentage of the population, athletic ability is a factor.

*Cold would be an environmental threat, but we’ve negated that artificially.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:29 pm to
Lying? Lol that’s exactly what he said
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Because it showed even primitive beings cared for people that couldn’t contribute


You're assuming people who shun collectivism don't care.
I help people, people have helped me. Cooperation and voluntarism are underrated.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:31 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59184 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Is it really? There was a thread I was posting in yesterday where a guy said “blackies commit all the crime”. So please spare me


Someone else being a bigot doesn’t mean you aren’t one as well. You clearly are.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77158 posts
Posted on 7/10/22 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Because it showed even primitive beings cared for people that couldn’t contribute.
There is a massive difference between “couldn’t” contribute and “won’t” contribute.

What do you think the Neanderthals did with tribal members who wouldn’t contribute and were merely a drain on resources?

The “elderly and infirm” aren’t the ones who will bring about “Idiocracy”.
This post was edited on 7/10/22 at 1:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram