Started By
Message

re: Should Arts and Humanities Majors be denied Grants and Loans?

Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:18 pm to
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:18 pm to
You could make the argument that since most colleges have a core curriculum that has the supposed purpose of making well rounded students that (in most cases) you don't need an English major to write the next great novel.

I'm a firm believer in the value of a liberal arts education but it's kind of disingenuous to imply that in today's ever more technical world, an English major from UNO is going to have the opportunities that the computer science major will have, outliers excepted.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

The next great American novel will be written in business English with a liberal sprinkling of engineering and computer jargon.


I just pre ordered from Amazon, its called "Boring arse Analytical People are Boring" cant wait I'll post a review.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37399 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

the Successful English Major would have been unemployed as a Marketing Major?


Why are you trying to tell people what to study? Are you telling me that Marketing is such a complicated concept that an English major can't pick it up?

Because you'd be dead wrong. Diversity of thought is a good thing. Heck, I'd rather have an industrious biology or English major who might have a divergent opinion and took to the Marketing realm, rather than a Marketing major.

The problem is three-fold:
1) Politicians want degrees tied to outcomes for proof for data/value/etc.
2) The general public thinks degree=jobs
3) Employers are too lazy to actually vet potential employees correctly and too short sighted to invest in them, so having a "Marketing Degree," as proof is just an easy out.

It's a mess, but employing measure to limit this is not the answer. Correcting beliefs is.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10056 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:22 pm to
English is a valuable major for one with sociability.

Anyone that believes otherwise is a fricking bird brain.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37399 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

quote:

Means you're effectively putting rails and limitations on knowledge output? Think about that for a second.



This seems premised on the idea that Arts and Humanities programs convey knowledge, which is arguable.



They do, and it really isn't. Perhaps inside of a limited view of knowledge as a product of data and measurement, sure. But that's not knowledge.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84284 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:23 pm to
My wife got a sociology degree and makes above average money for people her age and with her commission probably more than a lot of posters here. Generalizing the potential of someone based on their chosen major isn't particilarly smart.
Posted by sean5340
Houma
Member since Aug 2011
466 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Also, I want to see as a %

1 million BUS majors
25,000 art history

150k default in business
15k default in Art History

"study shows bus majors default 10 fold over art history majors"



15% versus 60%
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89925 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:24 pm to
Troll...
Posted by Dr Rosenrosen
Member since May 2006
3343 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:24 pm to
Because I know alot of attorneys that majored in Poli Sci and most attorneys obviously make bank.

No they don't. Most new law grads are carrying massive debts and have mediocre employment prospects.

A poli sci grad with a 145 LSAT should not be allowed to borrow $150K in govt backed loans to attend a fourth tier law school.

This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 5:25 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79322 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:24 pm to
IMO the point would not only be to funnel students into majors with direct ties to employment, but to force universities to enhance the value of their liberal arts offerings.

Good, rigorous liberal arts education is an excellent thing. Too bad programs are dominated by fluff and don't convey the attributes we associate with a classical liberal arts education.
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15049 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Are you telling me that Marketing is such a complicated concept that an English major can't pick it up?

Lost in the anti-liberal arts rabblerousing is that the % of students getting lib arts degrees has been steadily declining for about 40 years. Yet the general public has this fixed idea that colleges are churning out nothing but transgender studies majors. In fact the most popular degree these days, by far, is general business.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:26 pm to
Also shitty
Posted by Iona Fan Man
Member since Jan 2006
27462 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

The next great American novel will be written in business English with a liberal sprinkling of engineering and computer jargon.


I just pre ordered from Amazon, its called "Boring arse Analytical People are Boring" cant wait I'll post a review.




George R. R. Martin did okay with his journalism degree.....a Journalist is a paid gig....an Englishist is not.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:26 pm to
Are there any majors that are not valuable for people "with sociability"?
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10056 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:26 pm to
Freauxzen,

There is literally one option to complete the task at hand while maintaining our current educational structure. This option is to broaden the social contract and make undergraduate studies completely free of charge, like in Europe.

Good luck
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84284 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:26 pm to
Well that's embarrassing for Kash. I think my wife would have I retorted those numbers better than him. And she's a dumb woman
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37399 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

IMO the point would not only be to funnel students into majors with direct ties to employment, but to force universities to enhance the value of their liberal arts offerings.

Good, rigorous liberal arts education is an excellent thing. Too bad programs are dominated by fluff and don't convey the attributes we associate with a classical liberal arts education.



Exactly. I'm a very big proponent of overhauling A & H or LA departments into a more flexible and worthwhile degree with interdisciplinary work and more valuable degree outcomes.

But for that kind of change business must be on board to open up their hiring practices a bit.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10056 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:28 pm to
Being smart and charismatic is valued, regardless of degree. So why should your education be unsubsidized for being such a person?
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
5977 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

English Major




English majors with a focus in technical writing make good money
Posted by Iona Fan Man
Member since Jan 2006
27462 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

My wife got a sociology degree and makes above average money for people her age and with her commission probably more than a lot of posters here. Generalizing the potential of someone based on their chosen major isn't particilarly smart.



whats her job?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram