Started By
Message

re: Russia to test 'Satan 2' nuke capable of wiping out an entire nation

Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:14 pm to
I'll worry about this when that Beta Pootin finally rides on 2 rather than 3 wheels...

Wimp.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 2:15 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74595 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Mig 25


Is that supposed to be a twin tail Tornado knock off?


No, it's not really a knock-off of any western aircraft. Rather it's the Russian's answer to a threat they thought was real but really wasn't, namely waves of very high flying super sonic American bombers penetrating Soviet airspace to deliver nuclear payloads.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Loved me some Slim Pickins in Dr Strange Love


I figure if you have to go out in a blaze of glory, that's near the top of the list.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

How could that thing fly mach 2 with all that shite hanging on under the wings?


You can put a brick into orbit if you strap a big enough engine to it. That's how.

MOAR POWER!
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96241 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Loved me some Slim Pickins in Dr Strange Love


That was a B-52. Young James Earl Jones on his crew, too.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:22 pm to
It's a missile. Not a new nuclear weapon. It's just a delivery system.

Plus the things the US is packing now.. make fat man look like a firecracker
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 2:25 pm
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

That was a B-52.
Granted, regardless though, watching Slim fly out the bomb bay door in bull riding mode was the shitz.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

I figure if you have to go out in a blaze of glory, that's near the top of the list.


Yeah, as ways to go, "Underneath a detonating thermonuclear weapon" is a pretty perfect way. You might not even have time to register the flash before you stop being biology and start being physics. Oddly enough, though, "A few miles away from a detonating thermonuclear weapon" is one of the most horrific ways to go.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 2:27 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96241 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Seems like they had some issue with fuel shifting during flight. If I'm thinking of the right aircraft.


Yeah - fuel stacking and they needed drogues to land (if they landed with more than a certain percentage of fuel AND full bomb load).

BUFFs couldn't land fully loaded, either. They would just dump the fuel in the rare case of an emergency landing. They never put more than about 10% over (wartime reserve) what they needed to fly a B-52 mission. I'm not sure what the protocols were for the Hustler - it was such a high performance, problematic aircraft, they probably had their own deal going.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63518 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

US found it to be a tin can with little technical prowess and the Russians were using over inflated numbers in their specs. However, the US also found it could take a beating and parts were dirt cheap. It may not have been a super spec'd aircaft but wasn't without it's merits.


Sounds like you are talking about the AK-47
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96241 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

You can put a brick into orbit if you strap a big enough engine to it. That's how.


Absolutely accurate as well. The F-4 Phantom was a US Air Force experiment to see if, given enough thrust, even a brick will fly. The F-4 was a twin engine "multipurpose" aircraft, with fighter, strike, EW, recon, etc. variants. The checklist for an F-4 if you lose 1 engine reads:

"Step 1: Get out of the aircraft as quickly as possible."

It has the glide ratio of a set of car keys.
Posted by RabidTiger
Member since Nov 2009
3127 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 2:49 pm to
I can't find a source for this that is not a British tabloid.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74595 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Absolutely accurate as well. The F-4 Phantom was a US Air Force experiment to see if, given enough thrust, even a brick will fly. The F-4 was a twin engine "multipurpose" aircraft, with fighter, strike, EW, recon, etc. variants. The checklist for an F-4 if you lose 1 engine reads:

"Step 1: Get out of the aircraft as quickly as possible."

It has the glide ratio of a set of car keys.



True. But she sure was one pretty bird IMO...

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram