Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Permian Gas Worth Less Than Nothing for 118 Days This Year; But New Demand Coming

Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:58 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
30090 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 11:58 am
quote:

Outside Pecos, Texas, Chevron is getting ready to build a power plant to solve a problem the Permian Basin has been stuck with for years, which is that it produces far more natural gas than anyone nearby is willing to pay for.

Chevron's subsidiary, Energy Forge One, signed a 20-year agreement with Microsoft in June to build a gas-fired plant beside a data center campus, ramping up to roughly 2.67 gigawatts. The final investment decision is due by the end of this year, with power flowing in 2028.


quote:

Most of the talk out of Midland this year has been about restraint, with fewer rigs, tighter budgets and what one trade publication called a transition to slower, more disciplined growth. That describes the oil side well enough, but it misses what's happening with gas.

WTI averaged $65 a barrel in 2025 and roughly $84 through July of this year, well above the $63 to $69 breakeven that Midland and Delaware basin operators reported to the Dallas Fed, so producers kept drilling.

The catch is that every barrel now brings up more gas than it did a few years ago, a rising gas-to-oil ratio that tends to come with age in almost any oil field.

The EIA expects Permian gas production to average 29.2 Bcf/d this year, up 6% and a record for the region.

There isn't enough pipeline to move all of it…

Waha, the pricing hub for Permian gas, traded negative on 118 of the first 131 trading days this year
and is on pace to beat 2024's record for negative days.

Negative means producers pay someone to take the gas off their hands, which they do because the alternative is shutting in the oil well that's actually making them money. So the Permian's trouble isn't production; it's that one of its two products spends much of the year worth less than nothing.


quote:

East Daley Analytics figures LNG terminals and data centers together will pull more than 20 Bcf/d of new demand, and that the pipelines now being built toward the Gulf Coast won't sit empty waiting for it.

Their read is that producers may end up drilling gassier acreage on purpose, just to keep both products moving through infrastructure that was designed mostly around crude.


quote:

The plant going up at Pecos sits next to the wellhead, buys gas that would otherwise be competing for space in an oversubscribed gathering system, and burns it on site to make electricity the data center uses directly, never touching the public grid.


quote:

The simple fact is that the Permian makes more gas than the market can absorb even after the pipelines get built, and data centers are the first buyers in years with enough money and enough impatience to put a power plant where the gas already is.


LINK
Posted by FOBW
N.O.
Member since Sep 2016
530 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:18 pm to
Great plan if it fits into your existing business. I’d be worried if it was a thing all by itself unlike anything else you were doing.

I remember Shell was talking up getting into the generating electricity business a few years ago. I think they gave that idea up for whatever reason.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43013 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:23 pm to
If we had the infrastructure we could power the world at damn near free energy costs, we have so much.

We need more pipelines and we need or LNG facilities. We could put Russia out of commission for ever.

Freaking anti pipeline protestors and politicians.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
30090 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:28 pm to
Pipeline protesters and the politicians and bureaucrats who align with them are ultimate asshats.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 1:43 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43723 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Pipeline protesters and the politician and bureaucrats who align with them are ultimate asshats.


This
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41672 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 1:36 pm to
I have always wondered why we flare off gas/methane at oil rigs.

I know it’s expensive but why not pipe that shite into the pipeline and use it for energy or creating graphene which is now a possibility.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
30090 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

I have always wondered why we flare off gas/methane at oil rigs.


Sometimes for safety issues, but yeah…in the Permian before State of NM started cracking down several years ago and the EPA eventually, there was a shite ton of flaring. NM 128 between Jal and Loving used to have so many flares going, they served as fricking street lights along the highway at night.

Santa Fe and the NMOCD started cracking down on that, though, and now, it better be a big safety reason for the flaring.

But back then, it was done so the oil could be produced. Obviously you’d like to sell both the oil and the gas, but with lack of gas takeaway infrastructure, operators flared. I liked to compare it to lighting a dollar bill on fire in order to make $20. But in an ideal world, you like to make the full $21 rather than having to burn one.

quote:

I know it’s expensive but why not pipe that shite into the pipeline


Capital expenditures along with the long term planning for major midstream infrastructure. When the Permian started exploding with these horizontals and major fracks to get huge IP numbers, the outfits like Enterprise, DCP, etc couldn’t keep up, or secure the capital investments to keep up.

They’ve started to catch up, but like the article points out, the spot price at Waha has been pennies to even “negative”.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41672 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

They’ve started to catch up, but like the article points out, the spot price at Waha has been pennies to even “negative


I know it’s much less, but how much does it cost to flare it off?
I assume it’s not cheap.
How much more is it to capture the methane from oil wells?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80109 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:40 pm to
Explains the collapse of gas rigs
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
30090 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I know it’s much less, but how much does it cost to flare it off?
I assume it’s not cheap.


Well…if you don’t have sufficient gas takeaway, then the cost of not flaring is the number of now $102/bbl of WTI crude that you’re not producing and getting to market.

quote:

How much more is it to capture the methane from oil wells?


WAY out of my expertise on that! Don’t know if I’ve seen an AFE detailed with that specific line item. I just try to make the engineers’ dreams come true. They’re the ones who have to crunch the numbers and spend the money.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80109 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

then the cost of not flaring is the number of now $102/bbl of WTI crude that you’re not producing and getting to market


I mean, you aren't wrong.

Methane ain't worth a frick. It might be if you can get it somewhere useful. But the transport price will make you break even in most cases.

Breakeven is better than -$102/bbl

So yeah, you got from losing $100/bbl to losing $30/bbl if you want to look at it that way.
This post was edited on 9/10/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
355 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:03 pm to
In basin Permian gas has been commanding ~$1.50-$2.00 for the past few months, a ~$1.75 discount to Henry Hub; the constraints are resolved
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80109 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

a ~$1.75 discount to Henry Hub; the constraints are resolved


I think with one supplier down this week it has helped.

Always "worth" getting the product to market versus burning it. Just takes a long term outlook/commitment.
Posted by Lefty Diego
West of the Pecos
Member since Aug 2009
750 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:08 pm to
Energy Transfer is building the Desert Express Pipeline from Waha to Arizona. 48” 516 miles, 2.3 Bcfd. In service 2029.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80109 posts
Posted on 9/10/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Energy Transfer is building the Desert Express Pipeline


That fricker will be down 70% of the time
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram