- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: People who drive in the rain with their hazard flashers on should be flayed.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:33 am to Oilfieldbiology
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:33 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I have one.
From Louisiana, I assume.
quote:
Why does the flow of traffic change with heavy rain?
Why does the flow of traffic ever change?
2
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:34 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
If someone is driving with flashers I should stop and/or change lanes?
Those aren't your only options, tard.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:34 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
All depends on the rain. For a regular rain, absolutely. However, rule of thumb is when your wipers can't keep up with the rain when they are full speed hazards lights are recommended.
Sounds like a baloney PoBoy to me.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:34 am to DisplacedBuckeye
I answered your question. In order to advance the conversation answer mine.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:35 am to GCTiger11
Because, as well as this is about to go over, there a lot of people posting here who are more intelligent than the average coonass and the perspectives here often conflict with the masses because of that. The masses are stupid, especially in louisiana.
*runs and hides*
*runs and hides*
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:35 am to TigersnJeeps
quote:
Under Florida Statute 316.2397(7), this regulation was modified to allow drivers to use their hazard lights during periods of “extremely low visibility” and while driving at speeds above 55 mph. Inclement weather, such as heavy rain, can create extreme low visibility conditions and thus is now considered a valid circumstance in which to use these lights.
Boudreaux from Denham Springs in the F150 says impossible!
During my 5 years at LSU, I found out easily Louisiana has the largest amount of dogshit drivers so it doesn’t surprise me in the slightest I’m taking the side of Floridans, Ohioans, and Alabamians in here
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:37 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I answered your question.
You answered one of my questions. I asked another. No worries if you missed it...
quote:
Why does the flow of traffic ever change?
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:41 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Maybe God blessed me with a talent he didn’t bestow upon our fellow OTers from Louisiana, but when I’m behind someone with their blinking flashers on in a downpour, I can quickly access if they’re completely stopped (the lights are getting bigger/closer) or if that person is moving the same speed as me (the lights stay the same size and distance)
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:41 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
quote:
I will answer that....because they aren't for low visibility
Correct, and that isn't why they're being used.
Okay, the other reason would be due to slower speeds, which is also incorrect usage.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:43 am to GCTiger11
quote:
this regulation was modified to allow drivers to use their hazard lights during periods of “extremely low visibility” and while driving at speeds above 55 mph.
quote:
During my 5 years at LSU, I found out easily Louisiana has the largest amount of dogshit drivers so it doesn’t surprise me in the slightest I’m taking the side of Floridans, Ohioans, and Alabamians in here
If the visibility is so bad that it is termed “extremely low visibility”, in the name of safety you shouldn’t be driving 55 mph where a vehicle weighing over a ton can travel 80ft/second. You should pull off the road at a safe location, put on your hazard lights, and wait for the conditions to improve.
But I guess thinking that just makes me a retard from Louisiana right?
This post was edited on 4/10/24 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:43 am to Slippy
this pisses me off to no end.
Put your hazards on if your vehicle is disabled or you are on the side of the road, DO NOT use them while you are in motion.
Put your hazards on if your vehicle is disabled or you are on the side of the road, DO NOT use them while you are in motion.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:43 am to GCTiger11
I think you don't understand what the problem is, which seems to be the prevailing theme.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You answered one of my questions. I asked another. No worries if you missed it...
No you asked that question after I answered yours and asked mine. It’s ok if you missed that.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:45 am to GCTiger11
quote:
I’m guessing he’s probably going to keep asking you about your license because you’re asking a retarded question
Maybe you can answer it for me
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:47 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Why does the flow of traffic ever change?
So hazards should be used whenever the flowing traffic changes?
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:47 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
If the visibility is so bad that it is termed “extremely low visibility”, in the name of safety you shouldn’t be driving 55 mph where a vehicle weighing over a ton can travel 80ft/second. You should pull off the road at a safe location, put on your hazard lights, and wait for the conditions to improve.
I don’t disagree they shouldn’t pull over as that’s the safest option of all
But you admitted a guy going 45 in a 75 with flashers on could’ve gotten people killed. You really think it’s the flashers that were the problem? Or the..idk..going 45 mph on the intestate?
People are capable of going the acceptable speed with flashers on hence the poster above dropping a list of a majority of the states where they permit you to drive with them in low visibility except ..you guessed it…Louisiana
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:49 am to Steadyhands
quote:
Okay, the other reason would be due to slower speeds, which is also incorrect usage.
This is wrong. Some states require their use for certain speeds or vehicles.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:49 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
I think you don't understand what the problem is, which seems to be the prevailing theme.
Reading the thread, it seems like baws don’t like it because they can’t tell if a car is stopped or moving in front of them. Which is beyond me because it doesn’t seem like a problem anywhere else in the country
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:49 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
No you asked that question after I answered yours and asked mine.
So what.
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:51 am to GCTiger11
quote:
Yall really can’t tell if someone with flashers in front of you is completely stopped or moving at the same pace you are?
That's the point, you shouldn't need to tell, which is the basis for the law. You've clearly never driven in true white out blinding conditions, it's easier to see a continuous light than intermittent light. If their hazards aren't on, then you know they are still moving forward and you're not going to just plow into them. Depth perception is better with a continuous glow than it is with intermittent lighting.
Page 8 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News