- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:04 pm to Janky
quote:Fine. Then look at my other link that shows my argument. Look, it is clear people arent going to believe me in here no matter what I say
I don't think you can just extrapolate out like that and get a real number in this case.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:04 pm to lsupride87
quote:
No I dont. I think a 30,000 sq ft house does
the post I replied to had a quote in it that said a 3,000 SF house cost $100,000 in upkeep per year. it was your post.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:04 pm to Croacka
My low end conservative guess:
$10k per month for prop taxes
$8k per month for maid and lawn care (minimum)
$6k per month for utilities (minimum)
$2k per month for home owners insurance (minimum)
$300K plus per year just to run it. Throw in your tax bracket and you have to make $600k per year just to pay to run the thing.
$10k per month for prop taxes
$8k per month for maid and lawn care (minimum)
$6k per month for utilities (minimum)
$2k per month for home owners insurance (minimum)
$300K plus per year just to run it. Throw in your tax bracket and you have to make $600k per year just to pay to run the thing.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:04 pm to lsupride87
You're getting "pushback" because your calculations partially involve speculating that a 30,000 square foot mansion needs 10 times the number of chefs a 3,000 square foot one does.
Among other things.
Among other things.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:05 pm to Croacka
quote:That actually equals 66,600. And that is just the inside house management staff mentioned in the article
I also learned that 800k / 12 equals >100K
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:06 pm to Hermit Crab
quote:Exactly. Not upkeep buddy, to fully staff the house
the post I replied to had a quote in it that said a 3,000 SF house cost $100,000 in upkeep per year. it was your post.
This post was edited on 6/22/15 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:06 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:
a 30,000 square foot mansion needs 10 times the number of chefs a 3,000 square foot one does.
of course it does!
those square foots gotta eat too!
right leFanboi?!
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:06 pm to Hermit Crab
quote:
the post I replied to had a quote in it that said a 3,000 SF house cost $100,000 in upkeep per year. it was your post.
Maybe in New York when you throw in high taxes and nannies which is why his article is BS because a 3K sq ft house ain't costing $100K per year here or else many OT'ers are screwed.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:06 pm to lsupride87
your math of $100,000/12=$10,000 doesn't quite work out.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:07 pm to Shexter
quote:
Same Bruni w Bluebonnet Dental Care? Also owns the Boogie Bus.....
Total a-hole
Yes. they sold it for alot of money. But now everyone is focused on the logistics and economics of staffing a fricking house this big rather than something relevant to BR and this purchase.
This post was edited on 6/22/15 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:08 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Been in the house a few times. Its worth every bit of six million. The land alone is worth a fortune if they ever wanted to tear down the house and build an exclusive development.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:08 pm to Hermit Crab
quote:Ummmm, like I said that is the staff for a 3,000 sq ft house. Multiply that by 10 for a 30,000 sqft house and it would be 100k
your math of $100,000/12=$10,000 doesn't quite work out.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:08 pm to stout
Thanks to this thread, I will be careful to consider these hiddent costs before I plop down 6 mil on my next estate
I don't want to be living to paycheck to paycheck just so I don't have to cook, clean, or weedeat
I don't want to be living to paycheck to paycheck just so I don't have to cook, clean, or weedeat
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Look, I have seen personal tax returns of rich people that have fully staffed houses over 100k.
The way your math has worked in this thread, I hope you didn't do their taxes or they might have some stuff to explain to the IRS.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:09 pm to Croacka
quote:Once again I never said having a full staff is required
Thanks to this thread, I will be careful to consider these hiddent costs before I plop down 6 mil on my next estate
I don't want to be living to paycheck to paycheck just so I don't have to cook, clean, or weedeat
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:09 pm to stout
quote:Good one
The way your math has worked in this thread, I hope you didn't do their taxes or they might have some stuff to explain to the IRS.
Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:10 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Multiply that by 10 for a 30,000 sqft house and it would be 100k

Posted on 6/22/15 at 2:10 pm to stout
He just looks at their January receipts and extrapolates for the rest of the year
Close enough
Close enough
Popular
Back to top



2




