- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pan Am Flight 759 -NOLA 35 yrs ago today
Posted on 7/9/17 at 7:17 pm to Charlie Arglist
Posted on 7/9/17 at 7:17 pm to Charlie Arglist
There was a really good documentary on this for the 30th anniversary. I think it was on PBS.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 7:31 pm to Got Blaze
I was also 14 when this happened. I lived on North Cumberland. I road my bike over to the crash and will never forget the smell.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 8:05 pm to The Don
I was at MSY today providing weather observations. Eerie feeling reporting thunderstorms today at the airport.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:05 pm to Charlie Arglist
And once again... Nash Roberts got it right before anyone else did.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 9:13 pm to NorthEndZone
quote:
This crash and the one at DFW in 1985 led to wind shear detection technology for aircraft.
My dad was on shift at MSY that afternoon, worked as a radar systems electronics tech. Talk about a bad day at the shop.
Another technology that came out of that was a program that ran on the air traffic control's vacuum tube computer systems that used last known speed, heading & altitude to help predict crash site locations following an accident.
Two of the guys that worked in the shop and one of the tower controllers at MSY wrote it following PanAm 759.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 11:04 pm to Charlie Arglist
Man, this is sad. I never knew that there was a famous wind shear accident that happened on takeoff as well as Delta 191, which happened on landing.
Imagine how powerful the wind must've been to overcome a 727. Those planes had complex high lift devices on the wings to enable them to get in and out of LaGuardia (which launch customer Eastern required) and of course, plenty of power. Still overwhelmed by mother nature.
From https://www.pilotfriend.com/disasters/crash/panam759.htm
Imagine how powerful the wind must've been to overcome a 727. Those planes had complex high lift devices on the wings to enable them to get in and out of LaGuardia (which launch customer Eastern required) and of course, plenty of power. Still overwhelmed by mother nature.
quote:
The damage to the aircraft was so extensive that little could be revealed about the aircraft's condition at the time of the accident. However, investigators were able to determine that the flaps and slats were extended properly. Also, the engine gauges revealed that the engines had all been set to a high EPR at the time of the crash. No evidence of engine malfunction could be found. Recovery of the FDR showed that everything was functioning normally throughout the short flight. The CVR was badly distorted, but with noise filtering, some of the recording was decipherable. After learning of the low-level windshear alert, the McCullers told Pierce to "Let your airspeed build up on takeoff" and suggested they turn off the air conditioning packs for takeoff, allowing them to get a higher EPR from the engines. McCullers also suggested that they turn slightly to the left on takeoff to avoid the worst of the weather.
From https://www.pilotfriend.com/disasters/crash/panam759.htm
Posted on 7/9/17 at 11:05 pm to just1dawg
quote:
Based on the meteorological data, investigators concluded that 759 encountered a microburst, penetrating the centre of it just after rotation where it then encountered a decreasing shear of 48kts as it flew into the backside, encountering downdrafts of around 600feet/minute. Investigators also concluded that, given the limited visual cues available due to the heavy rain, the actions of McCullers and Pierce were as prompt as could be expected. Evidence at the crash site indicated that they had actually stopped the descent and entered a slight climb just prior to hitting trees.
Posted on 7/9/17 at 11:26 pm to Charlie Arglist
amazing that this happened 35 years ago...life passes us by quickly...
Posted on 7/10/17 at 12:39 am to just1dawg
Nowadays, that type of weather that close to the airport would result in a ground stop. It's pretty amazing that they took off in those conditions - although back then, they didn't know what we know today.
Also, I despise the takeoff to the east, land heading west approach at that airport.
Also, I despise the takeoff to the east, land heading west approach at that airport.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 12:42 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
777Tiger saw it happen. He was a pilot and was second in line for takeoff.
Is this for real???
ETA: Damn, I guess so. LINK
This post was edited on 7/10/17 at 12:57 am
Posted on 7/10/17 at 2:41 am to Charlie Arglist
There was also Eastern 304, a DC-8, that went down in Lake Pontchartrain after takeoff from MSY on Feb. 25th, 1964.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 7/10/17 at 5:28 am to NorthEndZone
quote:
This crash and the one at DFW in 1985 led
I flew into Dallas shortly after the crash. It was an eerie and sobering scene. I was in the everglades when the Miami plane went down. I left work and flew home on valuejet before they were grounded. A harrowing flight.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 5:42 am to Charlie Arglist
I wa a bew employee of BRGH and they told us to be ready for the injured. We had the burn unit for the area. They never came. So sad.
Popular
Back to top

0




