Started By
Message

re: On this night, 157 years ago, two great armies faced off against each other...

Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:43 pm to
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:43 pm to
Grant wanted more troops in Vicksburg to lay siege since attacking the confederate forces wasn’t working. Lincoln accepted his request. Grant had less troops in only one batter during the civil war and lost. He usually had a lot more to work with.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71721 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Grant wanted more troops in Vicksburg to lay siege since attacking the confederate forces wasn’t working.


Oh, I know what you are talking about. Yes...he requested reinforcements because his 50,000 men would not be able to fully envelop the city of Vicksburg and the 12 miles of Confederate trenches that ringed the city. Had he not asked for reinforcements, Pemberton could have attempted a break out. His request was a practical one.

This post was edited on 9/16/19 at 7:49 pm
Posted by Yellerhammer5
Member since Oct 2012
11051 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

The men huddled together trying to keep warm


In September?
Posted by StarSaint
lafayette
Member since Nov 2006
7490 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:51 pm to
That's "Capt. Andrew Luck", sir.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71721 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

In September?


It was pouring down rain that night.

Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Oh, I know what you are talking about. Yes...he requested reinforcements because his 50,000 men would not be able to fully envelop the city of Vicksburg and the 12 miles of Confederate trenches that ringed the city. Had he not asked for reinforcements, Pemberton could have attempted a break out. His request was a practical one.


In the end all that matters is you win and Grant did that. I’m just saying, Pemberton was defending Vicksburg (inside the city itself) with less than 25,000. Grant had a navy constantly bombing Vicksburg and the confederates were nearly out of ammo. Grant had about 45-50,000 troops plus navy, and still asked for more, he ended up with 70 something thousand altogether. They starved the confederates out, but still a win.
Posted by Hogbit
Benton, AR
Member since Aug 2019
3091 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:54 pm to
frick Sherman with a broken bottle, right in his dead arse.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:57 pm to
History is always about what ifs.

Lee’s incursion into the North might have worked had he been able to choose his place rather than it being chosen for him at Gettysburg.

Even then he might have found a way if Stonewall was still alive and JEB Stuart wasn’t out somewhere playing grab arse.
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

JEB Stuart wasn’t out somewhere playing grab arse.


Was supposed to be Lee’s “eyes” during the battle and help guard his flanks. Very underrated disaster that doesn’t get mentioned enough.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
17684 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 7:25 am
Posted by junior
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2005
2701 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:42 pm to
I had an old marine from Houston tell me, “ getting our asses beat by those damn yankees was the best thing that happened for our country and the world.”


America! I’m all in team USA!
Posted by Hogbit
Benton, AR
Member since Aug 2019
3091 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:02 pm to
Meh
Posted by Sayre
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Nov 2011
5754 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:13 pm to
quote:


God bless those Southern heroes


Why don't you and the rest of you losers head on down to S. America like the other Confederates did when they got their asses kicked.
Posted by Hogbit
Benton, AR
Member since Aug 2019
3091 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:15 pm to
A carpetbagger on a Louisiana forum. Go figure.
Posted by Boo Krewe
Member since Apr 2015
9810 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:16 pm to
The British didn't devote full resources or manpower or used the whole ruthless tactics they did against non white colonies.

Also war against France and Spain same time
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178330 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:17 pm to
The South would have won the war if they took up guerrilla tactics and ground out a war that the North eventually lost the appetite for.

Lee was noble and too much of a gentleman and he rejected the idea and decided to fight the North head on.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26927 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:28 pm to
I will always contend the war was lost at Vicksburg. Grant never would have broken into those fortifications and was losing men trying.

Pemberton was not ready for a siege. He should have filled his warehouses. and instead of trying to relieve Jackson just sat tight conserving manpower and ammo.

He had somewhere around 25, 000. Johnston had scraped up around 30k. Perhaps the South would have been better served by sending Longstreet's First Corps west, instead of invading the north.

That would give Johnston or Longstreet, whoever is in command, somewhere around 50 to 55 thousand men in Grant's rear. Maybe send along Forrest since they didn't seem to want to use him in Chattanooga and his cavalry. There were more Confederate forces across the river that perhaps could have been brought to bear but the point is ol' Ulysses and Sherman would have been a long way from home and possibly cut off.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram