- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oil crash is kicking off one of the largest wealth transfers in human history
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:01 pm to Street Hawk
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:01 pm to Street Hawk
Time to buy an f250
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:08 pm to Bmath
Gotcha. Totally agree the system needs to be completely restructured.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:10 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
lowered demand. If demand creeps back up
I thought it was shown that this price decline was supply driven and that demand was actually up over the past 2 years.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:22 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
Oilfield baws here claim that people won't spend it and that they'll just save it. I don't believe it.
Neither would any respectable economist
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:25 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
Oilfield baws here claim that people won't spend it and that they'll just save it.
Hopefully they'll save it in investment accounts which will be the best of both worlds.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:35 pm to Bmath
quote:
Unfortunately a poor state with a budget heavily dependent upon oil profits isn't going to see a huge benefit from this paradox.
Leave Louisiana, problem solved.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:52 pm to Street Hawk
So if I'm reading this thread correctly, suddenly all you buffoons understand that when people have more money to spend they... spend it.
OK guys you're really onto something here.
OK guys you're really onto something here.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:53 pm to Street Hawk
How is wealth being transferred 
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:55 pm to GetCocky11
So with more money in consumers pocket,they should be able to absorb the cost of a raise in the minimum wage to $15/hr?
Posted on 2/1/16 at 12:56 pm to Street Hawk
quote:Damn, I wish Chicken would get a money talk board, this would be a great subject there.
Oil crash is kicking off one of the largest wealth transfers in human history by Street Hawk
Posted on 2/1/16 at 1:04 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
temporary windfall due to high supply and lowered demand. If demand creeps back up then sooner or later will the price
I do believe demand is down, but not substantially. Not near the 75%+ that the price of oil is down. It's a supply glut that's causing this. Oil is a weird commodity in that there is plenty of it. It's not like crops where there is only so much farm land and capacity to grow. There's ton's of oil, it's just how fast we let it flow. And right now the world is full of greedy people who don't want to stop the flow. People may have extra cash in their pockets, but it has nothing to do with the world having some major shift in demand. People haven't changed their lifestyles and beaten the "death grip" of oil prices. If and when the glut is wiped out and people need their fuel, prices will rise again and I don't see it lasting 4 years. Now the industry may be down and running lean for more than that, but prices will rise. Hopefully some lessons are learned and people will not try to gouge prices at $130 a bbl, but I seriously doubt that happens.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 1:14 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I thought it was shown that this price decline was supply driven and that demand was actually up over the past 2 years.
My understanding is you're right, but for the sake of this article's point it's the same (if not worse). The author is trying to make a nice headline out of something that will likely bite consumers in the arse. Just like people say "well you should have prepared for this" to oilfield workers, the average consumer is going to forget what $4 gas felt like and in two years when demand has been growing and suddenly supply is throttled down, the market is gonna get its money back.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 1:19 pm to arn
quote:
How is wealth being transferred
With the money I'm saving on gas, I can afford that down payment on my new Tesla.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 1:41 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
Oilfield baws here claim that people won't spend it and that they'll just save it. I don't believe it.
Have oilfield baws ever met Americans?
Posted on 2/1/16 at 2:51 pm to AubieALUMdvm
I buy the same amount fuel whether it is high or low, I feel like most Americans are the same. I go to work, day to day errands, and the occasional vacation. With the price low, it simply doesn't sting as bad at the pump, that's it. It's not like now that gas is cheap I'm just going to drive around all day or make some extravagant purchase.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 3:00 pm to Emteein
This, consumer demand for gasoline is relatively price inelastic.
If the price of toothpaste doubled or was cut in half tomorrow, it would not change how much toothpaste I buy.
Low gas prices just mean i spend less on gas, it doesn't mean i buy more gas.
If the price of toothpaste doubled or was cut in half tomorrow, it would not change how much toothpaste I buy.
Low gas prices just mean i spend less on gas, it doesn't mean i buy more gas.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 3:16 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
Oilfield baws here claim that people won't spend it and that they'll just save it. I don't believe it.
Unfortunately, they're mostly correct.
quote:
"The economic benefit to the U.S. as a result of low oil prices has been called into question due to the amount of economic activity that was generated as a result of the shale boom, itself," Anthony Starkey, manager of energy analysis at Platts Bentek, an analytics and forecasting unit of Platts, an energy and commodities information provider. "The shale boom created high paying jobs and generated demand for investments in infrastructure to drill for, transport, and refine oil. All of this was funded with $100 oil and now that those prices have crashed, so too has the money it created in spurring that growth."
Kilduff cited reports from the JPMorgan Chase Institute and Visa on the consumer spending boost in making his case, but there's an interesting footnote — both reports were from the Spring 2015.
Diana Farrell, the CEO of the JPMorgan Chase Institute and lead author of the report, said the answer to the riddle is this: cheap gas did help the economy — past tense.
In the period that JPMorgan studied — April 2014 through January 2015 — there was a boost in consumer spending which the bank could track because it used debit and credit card transactions as the basis for its research. But in the update that JPMorgan plans to release this Spring using more current data, Farrell said the conclusion will be different: the boost from cheap gas already occurred and isn't still happening, and likely won't again.
LINK
Posted on 2/1/16 at 3:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Neither would any respectable economist
There are many respectable economist on both sides of the aisle with this debate.
Cheap gas doesn't exist in a vacuum - if it did you'd be 100% correct. There are many things at play here. All of this "savings" from cheap gas has failed to materialize itself in earnings, the stock market, and consumer spending data of late.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 3:22 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
My understanding is you're right, but for the sake of this article's point it's the same (if not worse). The author is trying to make a nice headline out of something that will likely bite consumers in the arse. Just like people say "well you should have prepared for this" to oilfield workers, the average consumer is going to forget what $4 gas felt like and in two years when demand has been growing and suddenly supply is throttled down, the market is gonna get its money back.
Gotcha. The only way we all long-run benefit is if actual costs go down. Labor costs have come down some, but that's almost a tautology of the field being in distress to begin with. I believe virtually all of the companies that have taken on significant debt will go BK or some kind of re-org and convert that debt to equity. That will effectively lower the breakeven costs of the producers (in some cases, in a fairly material fashion). So that will help. I just have no idea when the actual physical costs are going to be materially lowered.
Posted on 2/1/16 at 4:13 pm to AubieALUMdvm
quote:
won't spend it and that they'll just save it
I believe there's articles addressing that people will not save it. They will, in fact, spend it on their new affordable health care plans.
Popular
Back to top


0



