- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oh no Pfizer bros. RFK just nuked MRNA vaccine development
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:50 am to RyanMartin835
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:50 am to RyanMartin835
How will I get my wife’s son (they/them) their 15th booster shot now?
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:50 am to Kentucker
quote:
Indeed. mRNA is being used to develop a super-efficient cancer treatment that doesn’t require chemo or radiation.
Some sources suggest that Ivermectin may be a legitimate way.
"Ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs."
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:50 am to Cotten
quote:
unless you have a serious problem with reading comprehension or you're illiterate.
That would be correct
quote:
you're one of those "The science is settled" and "You don't need to do your own research, just know Dr.'s much smarter than you did it for you" folks.
This is also correct. Don’t believe how smart he is? Just ask him
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:51 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
I've challenged you several times in this thread
I hope you can overcome this anonymous internet message board hardship
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:51 am to Cotten
quote:
To make such an insane statement you have to have absolutely zero knowledge of the horrific medical treatment of HIV patients in the past and Fauci's direct role.
Nah, I am well aware of both the original treatment and Fauci's role. I said it was AIDS denialism because the part that was quoted suggested that the link between AIDS and HIV was somehow in question. It is not.
quote:
If not, FYI you're simping for a complete fricking monster who should be in jail for life at a minimum.
He should not.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:52 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Nah, I am well aware of both the original treatment and Fauci's role
According to you, you’re well aware of everything
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:53 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
I hope you can overcome this anonymous internet message board hardship
I mean, this has been extremely easy.
Shouldn't you little chihuahuas have a little more fight? Sad. They aren't sending their best.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:53 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:How exactly do you think you come across?
According to you, you’re well aware of everything
I truly want you to answer that
This post was edited on 8/6/25 at 9:54 am
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:54 am to lsupride87
Let's put this Damar Hamlin bullshite of commotio cordis to rest. Listen to his answer at the 4:25 mark and tell me if it was something just as simple as commotio cordis or if he was given strict instructions by his doctors and the NFL not to disclose anything about the mandated mRNA and boosters the league put those young men through.
4:25 here you go.
4:25 here you go.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:56 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
Let's put this Damar Hamlin bullshite of commotio cordis to rest. Listen to his answer at the 4:25 mark and tell me if it was something just as simple as commotio cordis or if he was given strict instructions by his doctors and the NFL not to disclose anything about the mandated mRNA and boosters the league put those young men through.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:56 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
According to you, you’re well aware of everything
Let's be real, I could write out a long post about Fauci's role, your eyes would glaze over from reading a few words you would have trouble understanding, and you'd scurry away in the end.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:00 am to lsupride87
quote:
How exactly do you think you come across? I truly want you to answer that
I don’t post in threads that I don’t know anything about, you should try it
Nor do I present my opinions as fact. You should try that too
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:01 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Let's be real, I could write out a long post about Fauci's role, your eyes would glaze over from reading a few words you would have trouble understanding, and you'd scurry away in the end.
I believe that you believe that
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:01 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
I don’t post in threads that I don’t know anything about, you should try it Nor do I present my opinions as fact. You should try that too
Oh
My
God
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:01 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
I could write out a long post about Fauci's role, your eyes would glaze over from reading a few words
Why don't you write a long post about how you agreed with me that the initial vaccines should have been developed with a wider protein profile which is indicative of the traditional egg based shots, yet here you are 3 years later still simping for mRNA being completely safe to use as a 1-shot fits all approach to herd immunity for an airborne virus.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:01 am to lsupride87
You struggle with this because of your extreme narcissism and delusion
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:02 am to Tomatocantender
quote:
Why don't you write a long post about how you agreed with me that the initial vaccines should have been developed with a wider protein profile which is indicative of the traditional egg based shots, yet here you are 3 years later still simping for mRNA being completely safe to use as a 1-shot fits all approach to herd immunity for an airborne virus.
He’s too smart for you bro, you just don’t get it
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:05 am to Mingo Was His NameO
Yup. They really aren't sending their best. Sad!
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:07 am to F1y0n7h3W4LL
That information is from 2020.
Currently, the only trial I am aware of that is using Ivermectin as a cancer treatment, in conjunction with other cancer drugs, is for pts with triple -negitive that have progressed (gotten worse) using traditional therapies.
It will complete in 2026, and currently has 34 pts.
Ive dealt with 2 outstanding oncologists over the past 5 years and done tons of research on breast cancer in particular.
If you're aware of anything more current showing Invermectin is a recommended cancer treatment, Id be happy to see it.
Currently, the only trial I am aware of that is using Ivermectin as a cancer treatment, in conjunction with other cancer drugs, is for pts with triple -negitive that have progressed (gotten worse) using traditional therapies.
It will complete in 2026, and currently has 34 pts.
Ive dealt with 2 outstanding oncologists over the past 5 years and done tons of research on breast cancer in particular.
If you're aware of anything more current showing Invermectin is a recommended cancer treatment, Id be happy to see it.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:10 am to F1y0n7h3W4LL
quote:
"Ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs."
While I completely support any research into defeating the scourge of cancer, there have been no preclinical trials so the safety of ivermectin as an adjunct to cancer treatment is a complete unknown. On the other hand, mRNA cancer treatment has gone through successful preclinical trials with mice and will be done with humans on a case-by-case clinical basis after the FDA Investigational New Drug process is completed. I suppose we can say that the use of mRNA in devising cancer treatments is a bit ahead of that for ivermectin.
Popular
Back to top


0






