- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:17 am to dewster
That’s gonna be a major problem for NYC. $4,000 a month for a 4 bedroom does seem extreme. BUT just the Idea of living in NYC makes it $2,000 more than it should. In or around NYC I should say. The costs up there are enormous... I guess it could be worse. You need $1 million to buy a POS house near Silicon Valley that only has three rooms and is cramped as shite.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:18 am to MSTiger33
Ah, well that’s different and personal preference.
NYC can still be a great place for young families with elementary aged kids—assuming everything is open. Having pre-teen and teenagers in NYC is less-desirable due to schools and other influences.
NYC can still be a great place for young families with elementary aged kids—assuming everything is open. Having pre-teen and teenagers in NYC is less-desirable due to schools and other influences.
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 10:19 am
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:18 am to dukke v
quote:
$4,000 a month for a 4 bedroom does seem extreme
not at all dude. quit lying
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:18 am to dukke v
$4,000 for a 4 bedroom is nothing in NYC
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:21 am to MSTiger33
Can y’all get jobs painting BLM on the street in front of Trump office buildings?
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:22 am to dewster
quote:
The landlord is threatening legal action to collect the $20,000 in back rent. “
So you have multiple people living in this place collecting a grand a week on unimployment and one working, but they can't pay the rent? bullshite. They chose not to pay the rent.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:24 am to RogerTheShrubber
hey Roger first time I agreed with you ever. lmao. these ppl were collecting a band a week. the cost was not the issue
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:24 am to AbitaFan08
I live in Houston but I would definitely prefer Baton Rouge to NYC 
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:26 am to hiltacular
You are missing the point. Would you be married and have to have 4 other people living in your shite everyday??????? I don’t live in NYC and have no desire to. Where I live it’s paid for and the wife and I have privacy....... that to me is way better than just being able to say I live in NYC... it’s a great city but it ain’t 4,000 a month great.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:28 am to dukke v
they are 25 dude. not old geezer like you
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:28 am to Breesus
This is why I have renters insurance.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:you didn't waste any time taking this to facebook
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:31 am to Mr Perfect
That’s not the point dipshit. If I made 10,000 a month I’m not paying 4,000 just to live in NYC.....
Posted on 7/11/20 at 10:31 am to bee Rye
he spreading fake news there too huh lmao what a Karen
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:03 am to CP3LSU25
I would have loved NYC in my early 20s. I couldn’t afford to live there. I did spend a year in the west loop in Chicago and loved it.
Cities need to maximize the efficiency of their commuter transit network (rail, highways, bridges, etc.) to keep costs of living down and maintain a steady supply of job seekers to feed their employers. The cities that have these efficient transit networks established and already rely on a large proportion of suburban commuters will probably weather thIs storm better - especially those with limited geographic boundaries to suburban development.
I’m pretty bearish on the prospects of large scale privatized gentrification continuing in Americans urban centers if these riots and virus pandemics go on for much longer.
Cities need to maximize the efficiency of their commuter transit network (rail, highways, bridges, etc.) to keep costs of living down and maintain a steady supply of job seekers to feed their employers. The cities that have these efficient transit networks established and already rely on a large proportion of suburban commuters will probably weather thIs storm better - especially those with limited geographic boundaries to suburban development.
I’m pretty bearish on the prospects of large scale privatized gentrification continuing in Americans urban centers if these riots and virus pandemics go on for much longer.
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:17 am
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:07 am to dewster
WTF????? I now have a headache........
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:19 am to Clames
quote:
Not nearly as laughable as a dolt talking up NYC and very obviously hasn't visited other major cities in the world.
Yep that’s me. Never traveled outside the US. You caught me!
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:22 am to dewster
This happens when you artificially inflate home values partly to increase tax revenue.
Cities like NYC, Boston, and most of Cali are ridiculous in these scams. It’s not a surprise all these cities have one thing in common: high tax rates and democratic run.
That is not to say republicans do a better job. They fail in other ways, but elitism by Democrats is what is killing these places
Cities like NYC, Boston, and most of Cali are ridiculous in these scams. It’s not a surprise all these cities have one thing in common: high tax rates and democratic run.
That is not to say republicans do a better job. They fail in other ways, but elitism by Democrats is what is killing these places
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:22 am to CaptainsWafer
quote:
Move somewhere cheaper.
This is what I don't understand.
If I lose my job, my absolute first priority is going to be "How do I move?" NYC rental market is insanely competitive, and I can't imagine that, even in the middle of a pandemic, the landlord would have trouble finding a replacement tenant. In MOST states, even if you break a lease, you're only on the hook until someone else rents it. And the landlord must make an honest effort to re rent.
So, just from a numbers standpoint, it's way better to just leave, move somewhere else (you don't have a job tying you down anyway), and RISK owing the landlord money. Versus staying with no job and absolutely owing the landlord money. I don't understand the thought process here.
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:24 am
Popular
Back to top


0








