- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

NY Man freed after 24 years of incarceration due to DA dishonesty
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:21 pm
quote:
Ruddy Quezada, a 54-year-old man wrongfully convicted of a deadly drive-by shooting in 1993, has won a $4.5 million settlement from New York state, according to court papers.
Quezada spent 24 years in prison for murder before winning his freedom in 2015 when, after decades of failed appeals, the Brooklyn district attorney’s office conceded that prosecutors involved in his case had withheld critical evidence during his trial.
quote:
At issue was the testimony of the case’s single eyewitness, a man named Sixto Salcedo. Salcedo recanted his testimony after defense lawyers tracked him down in the Dominican Republic in 2001. In a sworn affidavit, Salcedo said he had been coerced into testifying falsely against Quezada when a New York Police Department detective threatened him with jail time if he didn’t.
ProPublica reported on Quezada’s then pending appeal in 2013 as part of a larger examination of prosecutorial misconduct in New York City.
Salcedo had been arrested on what’s known as a material witness order, a powerful, discretionary tool used by prosecutors to hold reluctant witnesses in custody until they agree to testify. Prosecutors at Quezada’s original 1993 trial told the court that Salcedo had agreed to testify on his own accord. They did not share a copy of the material witness order signed off on by a judge with the defense.
quote:
In 2003, Quezada appealed for a new trial, citing Salcedo’s recantation. In legal filings, the district attorney’s office called Salcedo’s claim incredible and insisted he testified truthfully. To back up this argument, the office said there was no evidence of a material witness order used to compel Salcedo’s testimony.
“There is no copy of a material witness order in the file,” Marie-Claude Wrenn, a veteran prosecutor who handled the appeal, wrote in court papers, adding that Shaban did not recall one being necessary.
A year later, documents uncovered during the appeals process showed, Wrenn discovered the material witness order in the trial file. She gave it to her boss. The office still did not turn the order over to Quezada and continued to deny its existence for another seven years.
Meanwhile a man rots in prison... Lots of
Pro Publica
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:25 pm to NYNolaguy1
Damn, that's so horrible I don't even want to imagine how that guy might have felt. Somebody needs to go to jail for that. Un forgivable.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:25 pm to NYNolaguy1
Not much more disgusting than putting your career ahead of a mans freedom.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:26 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
wrongfully convicted of a deadly drive-by shooting in 1993, has won a $4.5 million settlement from New York state
youre telling me unjust 24 years in federal pound me in the arse prison is only worth 4.5 million?
foh with that. i need that floyd mayweather money after that
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:28 pm to spaceranger
quote:
i need that floyd mayweather money after that
There really needs to be some sort of criminal punitive measure for DA's that overstep their bounds.
The person that put him in jail is most likely in retirement, so disbarring him does nothing, and that $4.5 million doesn't come out of his pocket either...
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:28 pm to NYNolaguy1
Marie Claude-Wrenn should be in jail. Her colleagues instead probably think she'd make a great judge. The American public thinks prosecutors are the good guys and shite gold. What a crock.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:30 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Not to mention the person who committed the murder went free.
The person that put him in jail is mostly in retirement, so disbarring him does nothing.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:33 pm to NYNolaguy1
How is it, that nobody goes to prison for this?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:35 pm to LakeViewLSU
The prosecutor lied in a pleading. That sounds like perjury and direct criminal contempt to me.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:37 pm to NYNolaguy1
I'd want the equivalent to how much tax money the state made in 24 years.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:37 pm to spaceranger
quote:Don't forget his lawyers get a third, so he's left with only $3 million.
youre telling me unjust 24 years in federal pound me in the arse prison is only worth 4.5 million?
That's only $125,000 a year ... without any ROI. So really it is like the state only paid him less than $6,500 per month (and that's using only inflation interest rate).
Posted on 5/9/17 at 5:40 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
The prosecutor lied in a pleading. That sounds like perjury and direct criminal contempt to me.
I am guessing that prosecutions for that are exceedingly rare:
1)Because the person who decides to prosecute are your old DA buddies
2)Because it makes the whole office look bad
3)Some of the people working in that office might still be working for NYC and don't want to be exposed, especially if they're elected. Or worse they moved up in the world and are now judges, etc.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:15 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
Don't forget his lawyers get a third, so he's left with only $3 million.
That's only $125,000 a year ... without any ROI. So really it is like the state only paid him less than $6,500 per month (and that's using only inflation interest rate).
when you sue someone youre allowed to recover lost wages on top of the damages. so theyre saying 6500 a month is enough to cover lost wages AND the punitive damages. Thats not nearly enough. PLUS theyre in new york so the 6500 a month is more like 3000 here. not a frickin chance i accept that. hell, i ddint go to prison and i wouldnt accept any job that only paid me that much
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:24 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I am guessing that prosecutions for that are exceedingly rare:
1)Because the person who decides to prosecute are your old DA buddies
2)Because it makes the whole office look bad
3)Some of the people working in that office might still be working for NYC and don't want to be exposed, especially if they're elected. Or worse they moved up in the world and are now judges, etc.
And 4) The statute of limitations runs from the act, when it should run from when the act is discovered or the railroaded person is freed (whichever is later). It should be considered an ongoing crime.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:30 pm to spaceranger
3000 a month? I got a bullshite degree from LSU and I got 4500 a month outta school. I would ask for at least 10k if I was in NY
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:35 pm to NYNolaguy1
Without clicking I'm going to bet he's still guilty but the only way to convict is through improper means.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:37 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
Don't forget his lawyers get a third, so he's left with only $3 million.
Attorneys get awarded actual fees in 1983 cases.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
The Duke U rugby rape case is what opened my eyes.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
4.5mm would not come close to me being incarcerated for 24 yrs....Frick them,
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:43 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
There really needs to be some sort of criminal punitive measure for DA's that overstep their bounds
That's what I'm saying. Where's the accountability?
Didn't DA somewhere up north go to prison for similar misconduct?
Popular
Back to top

12








