- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NY Man freed after 24 years of incarceration due to DA dishonesty
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:44 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:44 pm to Bestbank Tiger
I'm a NON ATTORNEY! , buthe I didn't think there was a statue on certain crimes, such as murder?
1
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:46 pm to Tempratt
Agree, prosecutital misconduct?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 6:50 pm to Dave lsu 89
Remove the statute of limitations on shite like this and make them personally liable.
Only way.
So beyond fricked up.
Only way.
So beyond fricked up.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 7:05 pm to Dave lsu 89
quote:
I'm a NON ATTORNEY! , buthe I didn't think there was a statue on certain crimes, such as murder?
Murder usually doesn't but I assume perjury does.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 7:15 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Remove the statute of limitations on shite like this and make them personally liable.
I agree. It's ridiculous that they can basically obfuscate themselves into immunity.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 7:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
Some shady shite.
I just wonder if he is guilty or innocent.
I just wonder if he is guilty or innocent.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 7:21 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I am guessing that prosecutions for that are exceedingly rare: 1)Because the person who decides to prosecute are your old DA buddies 2)Because it makes the whole office look bad 3)Some of the people working in that office might still be working for NYC and don't want to be exposed, especially if they're elected. Or worse they moved up in the world and are now judges, etc.
4) all the other people that DA prosecuted would be able to appeal their case.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 7:30 pm to mauser
quote:
The Duke U rugby rape case is what opened my eyes.
People on the OT are always saying you should not be afraid of cooperating with the police if you have not done anything wrong, yea sure!
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:15 pm to DAbully
quote:
I'm going to bet he's still guilty but the only way to convict is through improper means.
It's a DA's job to prove guilt, not ensure it.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
what’s known as a material witness order, a powerful, discretionary tool used by prosecutors to hold reluctant witnesses in custody until they agree to testify.
what kind of fricking bull shite is this?...sounds like something you would find the KGB doing in Russia...
I have never heard of such shite.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:22 pm to DAbully
quote:
Without clicking I'm going to bet he's still guilty but the only way to convict is through improper means.
quote:
DAbully
Checks out
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:38 pm to Spankum
quote:
what kind of fricking bull shite is this?...sounds like something you would find the KGB doing in Russia...
quote:
1. A proceeding to adjudge a person a material witness must be commenced by application to the appropriate court, made in writing and subscribed and sworn to by the applicant, demonstrating reasonable cause to believe the existence of facts, as specified in subdivision one of section 620.20, warranting the adjudication of such person as a material witness.
2. If the court is satisfied that the application is well founded, the prospective witness may be compelled to appear in response thereto as follows:
(a) The court may issue an order directing him to appear therein at a designated time in order that a determination may be made whether he should be adjudged a material witness, and, upon personal service of such order or a copy thereof within the state, he must so appear.
(b) If in addition to the allegations specified in subdivision one, the application contains further allegations demonstrating to the satisfaction of the court reasonable cause to believe that (i) the witness would be unlikely to respond to such an order, or (ii) after previously having been served with such an order, he did not respond thereto, the court may issue a warrant addressed to a police officer, directing such officer to take such prospective witness into custody within the state and to bring him before the court forthwith in order that a proceeding may be conducted to determine whether he is to be adjudged a material witness.
LINK
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
OT attorneys, is this criminal?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News