Started By
Message

re: Nine year old girl clocks 5.2 in 40 yard dash: Is it relatively good

Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by WestsideLSUZombie
Member since Feb 2017
162 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:20 pm to
Faster than any of the LSU media could post, so there's that.....
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:22 pm to
Nine year running a 5.2 40 yard dash
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
92263 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Faster than any of the LSU media could post, so there's that.....



kind of hard for them to do carrying a laptop and a fifth of Jim Beam while running
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59244 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:31 pm to
Not being the father makes this even stranger
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12967 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Not being the father makes this even stranger


This board's obsession with making a-hole comments and the inability to just respond to the damn question is even stranger. You fit right into that club.
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
25551 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:56 pm to
I think you posting on the wrong board is the issue and the reason for most of your a-hole responses
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:00 pm to
Y'all are missing the point. Anything 5.5 and under is flying for a 9 yr old girl.
I'm a father of 4 and without a doubt she will get faster before she is a freshman.
I would think under 5 for a 9 yr old boy would put him in the top 1% of kids that age nationally.

The "hand timed" comments are dumb. Mistakes can be made both ways.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45122 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:06 pm to
The fastest kid in the US ran right at 5.0 (11 year old boy). A 5.2 time for a 9 year old girl is literally impossible.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45122 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

The "hand timed" comments are dumb. Mistakes can be made both ways.
Well starting the clock late and stopping it early is one way a mistake can be made. What's the other?
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
41694 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:11 pm to
I'll time my, very fast, 10 yr old boy in the 40 today after I pick him up from school. I'll post the results in this thread. I don't want to go to the track, should I run him on concrete in running shoes or on grass in cleats?

He's never trained on a track start, or in track at all, so I'm guessing he'll be slower than if he had.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 1:14 pm
Posted by ShreveportTiger1987
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2014
5494 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:14 pm to
Stop being a douche.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12967 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

think you posting on the wrong board is the issue and the reason for most of your a-hole responses


What a petty response totally irrelevant to the topic. Just curious, even if it was the wrong board what did you personally lose in this transaction?

I did reference the LSU pro day times in the original post as a back drop to how a time for a younger person might relate.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12967 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Y'all are missing the point. Anything 5.5 and under is flying for a 9 yr old girl.
I'm a father of 4 and without a doubt she will get faster before she is a freshman.
I would think under 5 for a 9 yr old boy would put him in the top 1% of kids that age nationally.

The "hand timed" comments are dumb. Mistakes can be made both ways.


Exactly. The timing was not done with track meet equipment so even if the time was off a little it would still seem to be in the higher percentile as you stated.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12967 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:24 pm to
quote:


The fastest kid in the US ran right at 5.0 (11 year old boy). A 5.2 time for a 9 year old girl is literally impossible


Someone posted a chart in this thread which showed the range for 9 to 11 year old boys and girls are exactly the same. In the next age range the numbers begin to separate in favor of the boys. So why is this impossible?
Posted by Athletix
Member since Dec 2012
5142 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

A young athlete who has an advanced skill set because she loves to train and workout


Train and workout are words that should never be associated with a 9 year old or an 11 year old. I'm all about competition and pushing kids to be "winners". However, I'm not training a 9 year old to run the fricking 40. You got the kid pulling sleds and chutes? Hell where would you find a chute small enough for a 9 year old? Working on stance and jumps to shave a couple tenths off the time? Make sure the kid has good running form. Relaxed arm, with a consistent "hip to lip" motion.

People who "train" and "workout" 9 year olds are weird. Kids should be playing, not training. That'll come later in life.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 1:39 pm
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Well starting the clock late and stopping it early is one way a mistake can be made.


Isn't that 2 ways?

But ill play your need for the short bus explanation.

You can also stop it late....correct?
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The timing was not done with track meet equipment so even if the time was off a little it would still seem to be in the higher percentile as you stated.




If you started getting instructions on techniques, a coach could drop a point or two off a 9 yrvolds time in one day.

A 9 yr old girl running anywhere near a 5.2 is flying! That's .7 slower than LFs time at the combine
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27838 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

So why is this impossible?


She'd be one of the fastest girls of all time at her age. That's why.

eta. record 100m dash for a girl in that age group is 12.85. A true 5.2 40 yard dash would absolutely threaten that number.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 1:54 pm
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45122 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Isn't that 2 ways?

But ill play your need for the short bus explanation.

You can also stop it late....correct?
You got me... Yea, no one stops it late unless they are trying to sabotage the runner. I'm not sure a laser timed 40 has ever been faster than a hand timed. (exaggeration of course)
Posted by mistert
Member since Jun 2011
1003 posts
Posted on 4/6/17 at 2:00 pm to
Immediately confirm and video: Send it to Crimson Dwarf!!

If she is from Louisiana, and after O takes that fence to 30', she might be CD's only Louisiana Recruit.....

Or call Pokey!!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram