- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New York City is now calling on all residents to be neighborly and carry Narcan
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:07 am to lsupride87
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:07 am to lsupride87
quote:the key word in your sentence. you know the risks doing shite like this. I dont feel sorry no matter the situation. I hate it for their families and people left dealing with the aftermath obviously but not the individual themselves.
drugs
0
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:08 am to bad93ex
quote:Everyone on here for the most part does drugs
Easy, stay the frick away from drugs
And even when they made that drug illegal nobody could stop doing it either, and a shite ton of people died because of the deregulation of the product
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:10 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:09 am to lsupride87
quote:
Everyone on here for the most part does drugs
And even when they made that drug illegal nobody could stop doing it either.
Ok, let me clarify if it is a pill or powder from anyone other than the pharmacy then you probably should just not do it.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:10 am to lsupride87
quote:
But what about the 20 year old pre med student just looking to party like millions of other adults have done in their youth and they get fentanyl laced drugs and “boom, dead”
What about them? If people don't understand the risk by now then why should we have sympathy?
If you see videos of those parkour people climbing high buildings jumping around and then accidentally falling off and dying do you say "what an idiot" or do you say they just wanted to do what other people were doing.
Why is this any different? Both are high-risk and dangerous.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:10 am to bad93ex
quote:Right. It’s awesome hypocrisy
Ok, let me clarify if it is a pill or powder from anyone other than the pharmacy then you probably should just not do it.
“My drug of choice that’s extremely destructive is fine, but your drug is bad and don’t do it because daddy government says it’s illegal”
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:11 am to lsupride87
quote:
Everyone on here for the most part does drugs
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:11 am to stout
quote:Anyone that isn’t a giant hypocrite should fight for the legalization of it and regulation by the FDA of that drug in order to fix the problem
What about them? If people don't understand the risk by now then why should we have sympathy? If you see videos of those parkour people climbing high buildings jumping around and then accidentally falling off and dying do you say "what an idiot" or do you say they just wanted to do what other people were doing. Why is this any different? Both are high-risk and dangerous.
Or they should not be a giant hypocrite and fight for prohibition again
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:12 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:12 am to stout
Let them die. It would help with the homeless and crime problem.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:12 am to LSURussian
What are you confused about? I’d venture to say less than 1% of TD posters don’t partake in some drug
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:13 am to lsupride87
quote:
“My drug of choice that’s extremely destructive is fine, but your drug is bad and don’t do it because daddy government says it’s illegal”
Well one is regulated to precise ingredients and the other is cut by 14 years olds in 3rd world shite holes using baking spoons to guesstimate ingredients and some of those ingredients can kill whole herds of elephants with just small doses but according to you totally the same thing.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:14 am to lsupride87
quote:
“My drug of choice that’s extremely destructive is fine, but your drug is bad and don’t do it because daddy government says it’s illegal”
Are you referring to alcohol? If you drink too much, you typically puke your brains out and have a massive hangover the next day but that won't require bystanders to carry narcan.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:14 am to lsupride87
quote:
I’d venture to say less than 1% of TD posters don’t partake in some drug
Are you lumping in taking Advil with narcotics or something?
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:14 am to stout
quote:Of daddy government stayed out of it this wouldn’t happen. Kinda the point they’re stout. Gigantic American hypocrisy and daddy government is the main reason this problem exists
Well one is regulated to precise ingredients and the other is cut by 14 years olds in 3rd world shite holes using baking spoons to guesstimate ingredients and some of those ingredients can kill whole herds of elephants with just small doses but according to you totally the same thing.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:15 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:15 am to lsupride87
quote:
Anyone that isn’t a giant hypocrite should fight for the legalization of it and regulation by the FDA of that drug in order to fix the problem
We should fight for the legalization of cocaine and meth?
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:17 am to stout
quote:If you aren’t a giant hypocrite, yes. Or you should be in favor of prohibition
We should fight for the legalization of cocaine and meth?
Alcohol is one of the most destructive drugs on the planet. It causes more deaths and destruction than cocaine could ever dream of. Yet, here we are with people who partake regularly in alcohol and claim to hate big govt looking down their nose at drugs like cocaine and fighting for the govt to tell people what they can and can’t do. . It’s fascinating to me
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 9:18 am
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Of daddy government stayed out of it this wouldn’t happen. Kinda the point they’re stout. Gigantic American hypocrisy and daddy government is the main reason this problem exists
Wut? lol
Please explain in detail why you think this.
Is this your new libertarian stance? I do agree with libertarians that people should be able to do what they want with their bodies. The problem is that would only work if it wasn't a drain and burden on society.
People OD'ing so much that the public is being asked to carry Narcan shows that clearly isn't the case.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:And I think you'd lose that "venture." Unless you're going to stretch the definition of "drugs" to include aspirin, Tylenol, vitamins, beer, whiskey, etc.
I’d venture to say less than 1% of TD posters don’t partake in some drug
When I read "drugs" in your post I use the definition of street drugs since that is the subject of this thread's OP.
BTW, how long have you been a user?
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:18 am to LSURussian
I’ve been drinking alcohol for a while.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:21 am to lsupride87
quote:
If you aren’t a giant hypocrite, yes. Or you should be in favor of prohibition
Alcohol is one of the most destructive drugs on the planet.
I don't drink so I would be in your 1% and you won't see me make a passionate plea for it but I think you are comparing apples and oranges.
Alcohol is less addicting than narcotics, though. Not the same as narcotics.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 9:21 am to bad93ex
quote:If you want to talk about making drugs illegal because they effect the user, but more importantly have a negative effect on others, alcohol is the biggest culprit out there
Are you referring to alcohol? If you drink too much, you typically puke your brains out and have a massive hangover the next day but that won't require bystanders to carry narcan.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News