- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New fans of ending hug a thug! Hold parents accountable.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:07 am
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:07 am
First let me state clearly - what this 13 year old did was reprehensible and he should pay for his crime and his parents/guardians should also pay for the restoration of the damaged property.
In many crime cases especially violent crime cases kids aren't given bonds of 45k and in the vast majority of cases the parents are coddled with excuses - BS hold parents criminially and civilly for crimes, injuries and property damage their children cause. So what if they are in public assistance - send that money to the victims.
On the social media posts it's amazing how many of the "you can't control what kids do" crowd is clamoring for old school measures.
I am all for it especially if it applies TO ALL offenders.
The comments on social media news reports about this are such a 180 from the vast majority(especially violent crimes) youth crime stories it's almost comical - but it's not funny - criminal behaviour does indeed start at home and a lack of accountability causes it.
Lastly I never thought I'd see mainstream media using made up words in their reports.........
“He’s scary,” Wallace said. “Landry say no more hug a thug law. You not finna hug this thug, I don’t care how old he is. He needs justice.” per WAFB report on FB.
Kid's that bring guns to school don't get 45K bonds......
edit sorry forgot FB link LINK
In many crime cases especially violent crime cases kids aren't given bonds of 45k and in the vast majority of cases the parents are coddled with excuses - BS hold parents criminially and civilly for crimes, injuries and property damage their children cause. So what if they are in public assistance - send that money to the victims.
On the social media posts it's amazing how many of the "you can't control what kids do" crowd is clamoring for old school measures.
I am all for it especially if it applies TO ALL offenders.
The comments on social media news reports about this are such a 180 from the vast majority(especially violent crimes) youth crime stories it's almost comical - but it's not funny - criminal behaviour does indeed start at home and a lack of accountability causes it.
Lastly I never thought I'd see mainstream media using made up words in their reports.........
“He’s scary,” Wallace said. “Landry say no more hug a thug law. You not finna hug this thug, I don’t care how old he is. He needs justice.” per WAFB report on FB.
Kid's that bring guns to school don't get 45K bonds......
edit sorry forgot FB link LINK
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 10:17 am
5
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:11 am to choupiquesushi
Thanks for the post, paw paw!
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:11 am to choupiquesushi
What 13 year old? Link what you are talking about
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:13 am to Cosmo
quote:
What 13 year old? Link what you are talking about
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:14 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
in the vast majority of cases the parents are coddled with excuses - BS hold parents criminially and civilly for crimes, injuries and property damage their children cause.
Lol. What could possibly go wrong here? I’m amazed some of you dipshits can tie your own shoes
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:17 am to The Third Leg
quote:Maybe parents would have more involvement and control in what their kids do when it hits them in the wallet.
quote:
in the vast majority of cases the parents are coddled with excuses - BS hold parents criminially and civilly for crimes, injuries and property damage their children cause.
Lol. What could possibly go wrong here? I’m amazed some of you dipshits can tie your own shoes
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:29 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
Maybe parents would have more involvement and control in what their kids do when it hits them in the wallet.
Sure thing. For starters, parents are civilly liable for their kids damaging property, at least to some degree
Criminally - ”The doctrine of personal guilt is one of the most fundamental principles of our jurisprudence," Justice William O. Douglas Wrote in the 1945 case Bridges v. Wixon. "It prevents the persecution of the innocent for the beliefs and actions of others."
This protection is anchored in the Due Process Clause and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It bars the government from utilizing "guilt by association" to punish people merely for being members of an unpopular group or organization without evidence of their own specific intent to commit a crime.
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 10:31 am
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:35 am to The Third Leg
quote:
This protection is anchored in the Due Process Clause and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It bars the government from utilizing "guilt by association" to punish people merely for being members of an unpopular group or organization without evidence of their own specific intent to commit a crime.
I know parents are responsible for property damage, but they are rarely held accountable. During COVID 3 homes and several cars in my neighborhood had windows broken as some teenagers from and APT complex a little over a mile away. The kids were caught no parent or guardian was held responsilbe for the property damage or the stolen items that could no longer be found.
Property damage pales in comparison to the costs of violent crimes.
If the parents are on state, NGO or federal assistance - remove them from eligibility. Make it hurt.
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 10:36 am
Posted on 5/31/26 at 12:35 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
the parents are on state, NGO or federal assistance - remove them from eligibility. Make it hurt.
What if theyre running for office like the mom of the 13 year old that did this?
Posted on 5/31/26 at 1:38 pm to choupiquesushi
Someone has to know this little piece of shits name.
Posted on 5/31/26 at 1:42 pm to choupiquesushi
Dad would remind me from time to time that on the Marine Base, he was going to be held accountable, to some degree, for my actions. I mostly behaved.
My friend and I (8th graders) were drinking some Boone's Farm below our parents' houses (the quarters were on a big hill) when an MP drove up (we knew he was coming as you could hear the tailgate chain rattling on the MP's dodge pickups). We hid the booze in a leaf pile. MP told us go to home.
Looking back, that MP was probably 18 or 19 and he knew damn good and well we had stashed the booze.
My friend and I (8th graders) were drinking some Boone's Farm below our parents' houses (the quarters were on a big hill) when an MP drove up (we knew he was coming as you could hear the tailgate chain rattling on the MP's dodge pickups). We hid the booze in a leaf pile. MP told us go to home.
Looking back, that MP was probably 18 or 19 and he knew damn good and well we had stashed the booze.
Posted on 5/31/26 at 2:34 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
I’m amazed some of you dipshits can tie your own shoes
Its amazing how you can't understand how the people who are responsible for these kids shouldn't be held accountable.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:14 pm to potent357
quote:
Someone has to know this little piece of shits name.
Its out there who the mom is.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:17 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
Maybe parents would have more involvement and control in what their kids do when it hits them in the wallet.
Sure thing. For starters, parents are civilly liable for their kids damaging property, at least to some degree
Majority of the "parents" in these cases are poor af. Civil judgments would just be ceremonial.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News