Started By
Message

re: My first time capturing the Milky Way. Cathedral Rock in Sedona, AZ

Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:26 pm to
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Wow I would love to see that. Did you make it to the peak? I'm preparing over the next about 2 years to summit Kilomanjaro. Any tips?


I did make it, up the Great Western Breach. Spectacular.

The biggest problem most people have is handling the altitude, I highly recommend you take plenty of time going up. Altitude sickness is no joke, there were several in my group who had to drop out. I strongly suggest taking no fewer than six days to the top (which means 7-8 total). It costs extra but hugely boosts your chances.

Do plenty of cardio and stair-climbing, you'll need it. But the views are beyond believable and it was phenomenal.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:38 pm to
Awesome

Gotta get back out west and look up

It is comforting to me to feel so small
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23367 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:46 pm to
The wide open, dry, dead expanse just feels like a reflection of my soul.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 9:53 pm to
Ive been to Sedona dozens of times, its only an hour and a half away, and I have even been to the dark sky areas and never seen the sky like that. You must have some crazy lens or filter.
Posted by Das Jackal
Da Bayou
Member since Sep 2011
2653 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:00 pm to
Awesome pic!! I'm into photography as a a hobby and would love to get into astrophotography some day. I LOVE Milky Way pics .
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

would love to get into astrophotography some day. I LOVE Milky Way pics


New Pentax cameras have some pretty good features for astrphotography. K-70 and K-1
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:16 pm to
Very neat!
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52617 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

The picture is a little dark because I could have used a better lens. I also have noticed that this picture looks darker depending on your screen.
Are you using a full-frame camera? If you can afford it, Canon makes an excellent EF lens at 24mm that has properties as low as f1.4 at ISO 3600 that would do very well for you (if you're using a Canon full-frame camera).
Posted by hombreman9
USA
Member since Feb 2009
3782 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:46 pm to
Just curious about the settings... Does the high iso setting create much noise? Would you get a better image at a lower iso with a longer exposure or would the earth's rotation cause too much streaking of the image over a couple of minutes? I don't have much experience with this type of photography, so I'm genuinely curiious... Not trying to criticize.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Just curious about the settings... Does the high iso setting create much noise? Would you get a better image at a lower iso with a longer exposure or would the earth's rotation cause too much streaking of the image over a couple of minutes? I don't have much experience with this type of photography, so I'm genuinely curiious... Not trying to criticize.


If you have a camera with an Astrotracer, you can shoot with a longer exposure/lower ISO than you could without and not get star trails.
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Wow, that is a huge compliment. I didn't think anyone would ever use my pictures for their desktop. 


Just made it the wallpaper on my phone
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
178325 posts
Posted on 8/19/16 at 11:20 pm to
The coolest think about seeing the night sky way out West is how many satellites you see orbiting the earth. The sky is vivid and clear and you can see dozens of satellites.
Posted by moffettduck
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Feb 2016
857 posts
Posted on 8/20/16 at 12:04 am to
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
24051 posts
Posted on 8/20/16 at 7:20 am to
The entire American southwest is awesome, but Arizona especially.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52617 posts
Posted on 8/20/16 at 8:53 am to
quote:

hombreman9

The higher the ISO the more potential for noise. The lower the f-stop of the lens, the more light you have available on the sensor. The differences can be huge. For example, at f3.4 like the OP's settings, you have 50% less light hitting the sensor than a comparable lens at f2.4 which has 50% less light than an f1.4 lens. So, the lower the f-stop, the lower you can set the ISO and the lower you can set the exposure time. This results in much greater detail with far less noise and allows greater creativity in your shots with less streaking in the stars from the earth's rotation. It's why a high quality wide angle lens cost $1500-$2000 and your everyday lens cost $100.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52780 posts
Posted on 8/20/16 at 8:53 am to
Space porn
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram