re: Monroe vs Shreveport? Which one you got for classiest N. LA city

Both are disgusting.

Northeast la > northwest la

Unless of course you aren't in that group.

You are referring to poor black people that live on the farm.
It's prettier terrain, better hunting, fishing and land values are higher.
Very low crime.

quote:

---

Unless of course you aren't in that group.

---

of course

but we are talking overall, are we not? not just for rich white people

quote:

---

It's prettier terrain

---

LOL no

quote:

---

better hunting, fishing and land values are higher.

---

hunting - yes
fishing - no, I consider Toledo northwest LA
land value - eh...probably about the same

quote:

---

Very low crime.

---

quick google says Bastrop, Monroe and West Monroe as 3 of the top 10 most dangerous cities in LA....

with non from northwest LA...

LINK

Monroe is closer to the delta. Which is the greatest part of the state of LA. It all comes down to land, really. Clueless coonasses sit in their fetid shite swamps and foolishly think they are relevant in anything outside of getting shite hammered and being the butt of jokes. Everyone West of Monroe is just poor red dirt trash stumbling thru life in a pine treed haze. Monroe still has a semblance of old south charm, although it's almost negated by the low life blacks to the south and the bleed over from the pine tree meth people of the west. But there is charm there. Shrevport is billboards and casinos and East Texas folk. Way more shite to do in Shreveport. It's the 2nd funniest town in the star besides NOLA, not counting BR when LSU is playing athletics. But class? Monroe in a land slide.

I've lived in New Orleans, Shreveport, Ruston and Natchitoches.
NOLA #1. S'port and Nat. tie for 2nd. Ruston sucks.

why do y'all hate Ruston so much?

its a great little college town

I'll take Monroe (preferably West Monroe) over Shreveport any day.

quote:

---

Both suck. West Monroe and Bossier City is legit.

---