- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Male univ. student expelled after being sexually assaulted
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:27 pm to Not Cooper
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:27 pm to Not Cooper
quote:Nothing in your "Actual Story" link shows me that none of that happened.
None of this happened. She gave him head in the car, then went home with him, where she claimed he (same guy) sexually assaulted her.
Actual Story
0
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:28 pm to Rouge
quote:
good reasoning to not attend college
Yep, its why I didn't go. I couldn't be happier with my decision. I have a homely but submissive wife, 3 kids, and a decent assistant manager job at Arby's.
We miss out on the luxuries of life, like dental care. But we get by.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:32 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Bass ackwards thinking.
In regards to female teachers and boys they assaulted. Because that's ok.
In regards to female teachers and boys they assaulted. Because that's ok.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:34 pm to TSLG
quote:
This article paints a totally different picture of the incident.
Also, the guy and his father have a beef that his son wasn't provide ada accommodations because he wants legal crystal meth.
Well, fellas...we have our two sides.
It's also missing a number of key details the first lays out.
Her getting served fictitious liquor, her not stumbling home, her getting sloppy seconds at another fraternity house after getting "assaulted" then texting her assailant that she got home ok...
Totally believeable...
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:41 pm to Gings5
quote:
Should have just accepted the head and went on with it, John. You schmuck.
I don't think you understand the article. She pressed charges for assault.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:51 pm to SundayFunday
quote:
This kind of thing is directly linked to the Obama administrations hamstringing public universities into increasing Title IX Inquisitions.. er.. "Rules" to prevent the made up statistics of sexual assault on campuses.
Or when it was deemed under the Clinton administration that Oral Sex wasn't sex.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 1:58 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
her getting sloppy seconds at another fraternity house after getting "assaulted" then texting her assailant that she got home ok...
Wut? Seriously?
Posted on 3/15/17 at 2:00 pm to Breesus
quote:
Wut? Seriously?
quote:
This encounter soon came to an end—John was too incapacitated to maintain an erection—and the pair ventured into the house. At this point, their accounts are hazy, confused, and contradictory. John remembered passing out in his bed and Jane telling him she was leaving. Jane remembered collapsing into a bean bag chair and waking up to discover John on top of her, wearing a condom. Her pants were pulled down. She claimed she told him to stop, he did, and she left. (Whether this actually happened is in serious dispute.)
But Jane did not go straight home. She went to another fraternity house, uninvited, and climbed into bed with an unsuspecting person. She "jumped on top of him," and he told her to leave, according to the lawsuit.
She then headed to a different bedroom, removed her shirt, and initiated oral sex on a third person. She spent the night there, and went home in the morning:
John Doe sent Jane Doe a text at 3:00 a.m. to ask if she got home safely, and she responded in the affirmative and added "all good, babe." In fact, she did not go home but was instead at the annex of the fraternity house across the street engaged in sexual activity with a fraternity member.
Same link in OP.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 2:03 pm to NYNolaguy1
You never want to say this because a lot of times the guy is a POS in these situations. But the guy will always be at a disadvantage in these cases. Even if he didn't do anything he will be guilty until proven innocent. It sucks but it just shows that you have to be careful.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 2:10 pm to NYNolaguy1
Sadly this is no unusual.
I know of a case where the woman had sex on top of the male, then claimed nonconsensual.
I know of a case where the woman had sex on top of the male, then claimed nonconsensual.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 4:31 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Jane did not go straight home. She went to another fraternity house, uninvited, and climbed into bed with an unsuspecting person. She "jumped on top of him," and he told her to leave, according to the lawsuit.
She then headed to a different bedroom, removed her shirt, and initiated oral sex on a third person. She spent the night there, and went home in the morning:
John Doe sent Jane Doe a text at 3:00 a.m. to ask if she got home safely, and she responded in the affirmative and added "all good, babe."
And the guy got expelled?
Thank God I'm finished with school
Posted on 3/15/17 at 4:40 pm to Breesus
quote:
the guy got expelled
Yup. But that's not the reason for his lawsuit. The lawsuit is because he tried to file a sexual assault charge against her and the school declined to investigate because it was in "retaliation" to the original BS complaint.
quote:
Thank God I'm finished with school
Me too.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 4:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
She also stated during the hearing that she felt she was "just giving him what [she thought] he wanted."
The whiskey dick should've been her first clue.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 4:44 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Got to love liberal progressive thinking.
Man and woman both get shite faced drunk. Being drunk means the woman cannot be responsible for her actions. But the guy on the other hand is 100% responsible for his actions; or in this case he's being held responsible for her actions. How the hell does that make a lick of sense??
And all that while they scream about women being equal. So which is it?
1. Women are equal and no different than men.
or
2. Women are delicate flowers who need special protection from men.
its got to be either 1or 2. But it can't be both.
My friend, you are seeking logic where none exists.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 4:47 pm to Godfather1
quote:
She also stated during the hearing that she felt she was "just giving him what [she thought] he wanted."
The whiskey dick should've been her first clue.
Just imagine for a split second if a guy accused of rape said that. The trial would end immediately.
This post was edited on 3/15/17 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 3/15/17 at 6:45 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
and that he didn't report getting sexually assaulted to the actual police.
Can he still do that now? Sounds like the facts of the case are clear and her actions fit the legal definition of sexual assault.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 6:49 pm to NYNolaguy1
At least he got some head.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 7:03 pm to LucasP
quote:
These universities need to realize that allowing premarital sex just isn't worth it.
BYU is doing all it can.
Posted on 3/15/17 at 7:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
He should have pretended to be passed out
Posted on 3/15/17 at 7:21 pm to NYNolaguy1
Sounds like Jane blew everybody on the block.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News