Started By
Message

Louisiana Bond Commission votes to ban Citi and BoA from state Muni bond issue

Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:03 am
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:03 am
LINK

quote:


Louisiana is using the bond market to stick up for the Second Amendment.

The state’s bond commission voted 7 to 6 Thursday to ban Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc. from working on its upcoming debt sale because of the banks’ "restrictive gun policies," the state treasury said in a statement. Bank of America and Citigroup are the two top-ranked underwriters of long-term municipal debt, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

"I personally believe the policies of these banks are an infringement on the rights of Louisiana citizens,” Treasurer John Schroder said in a statement. “As a veteran and former member of law enforcement, I take the Second Amendment very seriously."



On the one hand, Merca frick yeah. But on the other hand, come on Louisiana.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 10:04 am
Posted by Lake Vegas Tiger
Lake Vegas
Member since Jun 2014
3250 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:05 am to
that's dumb as hell
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:06 am to
I'm sure this will be popular here, but virtue signaling in response to virtue signaling is dumb, particularly for a government entity.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:08 am to
Couldn't agree more.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:09 am to
quote:

"Citi adopted this policy because we believe it is a positive and balanced step to promote gun safety without undermining free markets or Second Amendment rights," spokesman Scott Helfman said in an emailed statement. "It is disappointing that the taxpayers of Louisiana will be deprived from competitive bidding for necessary public works because the process has been politicized."


LA is excluding the two largest muni bond underwriters in the US, which is a dumb move, but let's not act like they were the first one to politicize it.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58162 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:22 am to
That’s just stupid
Posted by Mr Wonderful
Love City
Member since Oct 2015
1045 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:25 am to
Politics and usual for Louisiana.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11485 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:33 am to
quote:

LA is excluding the two largest muni bond underwriters in the US, which is a dumb move,


There are other underwriters who will do just as good of a job or better.
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Member since Feb 2013
9354 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:35 am to
quote:

As a veteran and


I quit listening when you start your argument with this
Posted by AA77
Member since Jan 2016
3796 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:41 am to
Nothing surprising.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:41 am to
quote:

There are other underwriters who will do just as good of a job or better.


If other underwriters did just as good of a job or better, Citi and BoA wouldn't be #1 and #2 across the country.

The bond commission isn't excluding them because they're bad a their job. They're excluding them because they don't like their political stance.
Posted by pjab
Member since Mar 2016
5647 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:43 am to
So they effectively taxed their base for the 2nd A. Great move.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
30824 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:44 am to
I dont mind this one bit. Those banks put some legal business owners in a huge bind when they made up their stupid grandstanding policies. Its avout time it came back to bite them in the arse.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11485 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:51 am to
quote:

If other underwriters did just as good of a job or better, Citi and BoA wouldn't be #1 and #2 across the country.


In an industry like this the #3 or below can provide just as good of service as the #1. They just may not do the volume. Just because someone does more deals in the government sector doesn't mean they are the best. In the government sector it is about who you know not what you know.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 10:56 am
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16598 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Citi and BoA wouldn't be #1 and #2 across the country


#1 and #2 in terms of size, not quality. Walmart is the #1 retailer in the US but nobody is going to say it's because of high quality standards. Well, you might.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11485 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:52 am to
quote:

#1 and #2 in terms of size, not quality. Walmart is the #1 retailer in the US but nobody is going to say it's because of high quality standards. Well, you might.


Exactly
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:01 am to
quote:

#1 and #2 in terms of size, not quality. Walmart is the #1 retailer in the US but nobody is going to say it's because of high quality standards. Well, you might.


Outside of the political gesture, we'd still use Citi and BoA. There is now less competition for underwriting the upcoming $600 million issuance. There is no way to spin this as a good thing for LA taxpayers on a purely business standpoint.

FWIW, I wish Citi and BoA weren't virtue signaling either.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 11:08 am
Posted by fatboydave
Fat boy land
Member since Aug 2004
17979 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:06 am to
This is like the bakers and gays. I don't want to do business with you because of my beliefs. OK, I get that.

But this will probably cost the state more money because it will be some good ole boy like uncle Ray-Ray getting the business and we all know he ain't the swiftest underwriter of long-term municipal debt
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

There is no way to spin this as a good thing for LA taxpayers on a purely business standpoint.


To expound on this:

quote:

Renee Boicourt, the commission’s financial advisor, said prohibiting the two banks that control a third of the nation’s government bond market would cost state taxpayers more money. She also noted that only Chicago considered tying gun control policy to bonds, but city officials backed off upon realizing the move would make bonds more expensive.


So Louisiana and Chicago politicians, world renowned for their forward thinking and efficiency, are the only two entities that have considered this logic. Even Chicago realized it was a bad idea for its constituents and backed off, but LA will proceed nonetheless.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 11:09 am
Posted by reddy tiger
Mandeville
Member since Aug 2012
1560 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:25 am to
This is a cheap political stunt and it raises the cost of borrowing for Louisiana. Makes me wonder who has a family member, partner, or campaign donor that works in municipal lending.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram