- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana at risk of losing federal matching funds for infrastructure by 2019
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:57 am to doubleb
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:57 am to doubleb
quote:
I think they are saying our leaders need to cut out some things to fund the things we have to have, but they aren't doing that.
When it comes to infrastructure, there will be no choice. Projects will be cut and postponed. It's already happening.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:02 am to Boudreaux35
quote:
When it comes to infrastructure, there will be no choice. Projects will be cut and postponed. It's already happening.
I'd certainly hate to see them cut those critical pet projects when they could cut something unnecessary, like the infrastructure needed to keep the economy moving.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 10:03 am
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:04 am to goofball
quote:
a seemingly endless amount of waste to fund transportation "studies".
Perhaps they can commission another study to study the wasteful transportation studies?
the studies are federally mandated as per the national environmental protection act of 1969. if a roadway is going to get federal funds, an environmental study is the first step, and it's a law. the biggest study that gets demonized around here was the BR loop. because it seemingly fell through the cracks, it's often labeled as just a kickback. but many, many agencies were heavily involved and very, very serious about making the loop a reality.
but you know who wasn't very, very serious about making the loop a reality? the citizens of EBR and the surrounding parishes. everyone bitches about the traffic, but when push came to shove, they didn't want it. and public input is a huge factor in the environmental study. a contract was signed to perform the work with the full intention of helping traffic, many firms were involved and spent lots of time doing the work, then when the public was involved, they shot it down. the interstates can only be widened so much. there comes a point when alternate routes are needed. so many other big cities, and ones smaller than BR, can make a loop happen, so it's not like it was some outlandish money grab that was never going to work.
the same exact process is going on right now with I-10 and the lafayette connector. if the citizens don't shout it down, it'll go through, and no one will accuse it of being just a wasteful study.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:05 am to Janky
quote:
Here comes JBE with another tax hike.
The nice new infrastructure will make it easier for the middle and upper class citizens to leave the state.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:06 am to goofball
Zero Infrastructure
Zero new Middle/Upper Middle Class jobs
Zero desire to make diverse economy
Zero desire to bring back educated folks
Why in the frick are yall still there again?
Food, Family, and LSU only go so far.
Zero new Middle/Upper Middle Class jobs
Zero desire to make diverse economy
Zero desire to bring back educated folks
Why in the frick are yall still there again?
Food, Family, and LSU only go so far.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:13 am to goofball
quote:
'd certainly hate to see them cut those critical pet projects when they could cut something unnecessary, like the infrastructure needed to keep the economy moving.
Funding for infrastructure comes from different source than those "pet projects". They can cut all of the pet projects, but if the transportation fund isn't large enough to provide the match for federal funds, cuts will be mandatory.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:14 am to 50_Tiger
I can overlook highish taxes if it actually went to infrastructure to facilitate growth and better serve the taxpayers.
Things like widening I-10 in Baton Rouge, the Comite Diversion Canal, improving Airline Highway, replacing/repairing the old bridge in Lake Charles, finishing I-49, etc. Those are things that should have been addressed 20 years ago but never were.
Even the old TIMED agenda that voters approved did nothing for my area. We sure paid taxes for it though.
Things like widening I-10 in Baton Rouge, the Comite Diversion Canal, improving Airline Highway, replacing/repairing the old bridge in Lake Charles, finishing I-49, etc. Those are things that should have been addressed 20 years ago but never were.
Even the old TIMED agenda that voters approved did nothing for my area. We sure paid taxes for it though.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:15 am to goofball
Good. Federal funding should go to states that know what to do with it.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:15 am to Boudreaux35
I brought up the casinos because it was to be the money cow that would give the state new schools and roads. That was preached over and over in the early 90s.
I just like getting that shot in. Even though the gas tax is more prominent.
I just like getting that shot in. Even though the gas tax is more prominent.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:29 am to link
I find that a few vocal groups can go to these public meetings, demonstrate their opposition, and basically shut down a project even though the majority would like to see the project go through.
Unfortunately that happens around here a lot.
Unfortunately that happens around here a lot.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:29 am to goofball
I dont understand in the almost 3 years I have lived in DFW, the NTTA has been able to build 635 TexPress, widening 35E, and about ready to install the 114 Tollway.
Yet in the 12 years I've moved out of Louisiana. I-10 @ BR still goes down to one fricking lane.
Yet in the 12 years I've moved out of Louisiana. I-10 @ BR still goes down to one fricking lane.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 10:39 am to Cosmo
quote:
Also a massive medicaid expansion
Ding Ding Ding. Can't pay for what was on the rolls but lets add a bunch more freeloaders to the mix. Wasteful spending and dumbasses running the show!
Posted on 8/17/17 at 11:12 am to HeadedToTheWoods
quote:
I brought up the casinos because it was to be the money cow that would give the state new schools and roads. That was preached over and over in the early 90s.
Gonna need a link to that.
Have never heard it was for roads.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 11:13 am to goofball
The most effective way to combat the waste is to hire more investigators for fraud in Medicaid, Medicare, SNAP, or any other major program that doles out money to people. The truth is that there is that the costs associated with hiring 10 more employees to investigate fraud would pay for itself either through greater cooperation with the laws or with what they uncover. Also, you could eliminate some positions within government through technology.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 12:19 pm to Jimmy2shoes
quote:
Can't pay for what was on the rolls but lets add a bunch more freeloaders to the mix
Edwards jumped onto the medicaid expansion the first week he was in office.
Didn't even bother exploring to see if it was a reasonably good idea considering the expected price drop of the commodities Louisiana produces.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 1:45 pm to 50_Tiger
Tolls. Everyone builds new roads with tolls except Louisiana.... We just don't build anything.
Popular
Back to top

1








