- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Let me be very clear. The expectation and the next mission after we remove our people...
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:12 am to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:12 am to tgrbaitn08
But the demo is still happening, right?
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:24 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
But the demo is still happening, right?
Possibly maybe perhaps potentially it may or may not could be happening.
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:30 am to tgrbaitn08
Building wreckage would be a sweet NOLA Themed Hotel.
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:34 am to tgrbaitn08
I don't think this is the ah-ha moment you want it to be.
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:48 am to tgrbaitn08
quote:
some of the footprints that would be affected was rather large with the implosion plan,
What does that mean?
Posted on 11/26/19 at 11:52 am to tgrbaitn08
They are probably trying to save any foundation piling. Shits expensive
Posted on 11/26/19 at 12:12 pm to tgrbaitn08
We must get to the point of these news stories without Cantrell's picture or appearance. My GOD that is an ugly woman
Posted on 11/26/19 at 12:32 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Possibly maybe perhaps potentially it may or may not could be happening.
Your reply every time you stand me up at the KP.
Posted on 11/26/19 at 1:10 pm to TrimTab
quote:
Your reply every time you stand me up at the KP.
I’ll be there tonight through Sunday
Posted on 11/26/19 at 1:18 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Based on what I have read, I think they are simply trying to figure a way to tear it down piece by piece vice using explosives. I know a thing or two about explosives and they are going to need to use some sizeable charges to bring that thing down. The reason is that it won’t be your standard controlled implosion which involves placing small charges all throughout the structure at key points. Given the unstable nature of the current partially collapsed building, they won’t be able to reach some of those key points. This means larger charges to get the same effect.
Larger charges means lots of collateral damage. Not just broken windows either. Given the age of some of the surrounding buildings (Saenger) you could end up with some significant structural damage and you can just imagine those costs. If they can tear this thing down physically piece by piece, even pulling parts off and letting them fall into the street, that is the way to do it. But that won’t happen by January. No way.
Larger charges means lots of collateral damage. Not just broken windows either. Given the age of some of the surrounding buildings (Saenger) you could end up with some significant structural damage and you can just imagine those costs. If they can tear this thing down physically piece by piece, even pulling parts off and letting them fall into the street, that is the way to do it. But that won’t happen by January. No way.
Popular
Back to top

2






