- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:47 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:47 am to OMLandshark
Jack has said they’re coming back to the courtroom. It’s here,
2
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:48 am to OMLandshark
frick man - don't have a good feeling.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:50 am to Sherman Klump
I don't either.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:50 am to ducktale
quote:I’m not. I’m stating that it’s possible under the facts of the case that the second two people shot were objectively reasonable in perceiving KR as an imminent threat while KR was also objectively reasonable in also perceiving them as an imminent threat and justified in his use of force.
Your posts are arguing that someone could have a reasonable belief that Kyle was an active shooter because of things they didn't see.
When someone pulls a toy gun or other object from their clothing, a police officer is often justified in using deadly force even where it turns out they were incorrect about the perceived threat.
Someone can form an objectively reasonable belief of a threat and also be wrong.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 11:52 am
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:50 am to OMLandshark
That's what I'm saying. It takes one baw on that jury to dig his heels in and say he's not budging on acquittal.
From what I read, the voir dire found that something like 15 of the original 20 jurors has experience using firearms. You can't tell me that out of those 15, there wasn't one who laughed to themselves when a prosecutor said there was no such thing as a left handed rifle. That after watching their community get burned down by anarchists, they'd send a kid to prison with the mountain of exculpatory evidence behind him. I know some people get scared and kowtow, but I have more faith in the ones who don't.
I hope I'm right.
From what I read, the voir dire found that something like 15 of the original 20 jurors has experience using firearms. You can't tell me that out of those 15, there wasn't one who laughed to themselves when a prosecutor said there was no such thing as a left handed rifle. That after watching their community get burned down by anarchists, they'd send a kid to prison with the mountain of exculpatory evidence behind him. I know some people get scared and kowtow, but I have more faith in the ones who don't.
I hope I'm right.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:50 am to Sherman Klump
The not guilty's likely caved on the lesser charges. That's why we lose.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:52 am to OMLandshark
I don’t think there’s any amount of fear or threats that could make me vote guilty after seeing the facts presented.
Just couldn’t do it.
Just couldn’t do it.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:53 am to OMLandshark
Nothing on the streams. someone tell these fake news reporters to frick off.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:55 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I don’t think there’s any amount of fear or threats that could make me vote guilty after seeing the facts presented.
That's called integrity.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:55 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I don’t think there’s any amount of fear or threats that could make me vote guilty after seeing the facts presented.
Just couldn’t do it.
I don’t have any kids, so there’s no way in hell I’d convict.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:55 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Agreed. It all comes down to the first guy killed. If he was justified in using force there, and I think he was, then there can be no question about the next two he shot.
I don’t think there’s any amount of fear or threats that could make me vote guilty after seeing the facts presented.
Just couldn’t do it.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 11:57 am
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:56 am to WDE24
quote:
When someone pulls a toy gun or other object from their clothing, a police officer is often justified in using deadly force even where it turns out they were incorrect about the perceived threat.
Wrong. cops have been convicted for not verifying the threat.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:57 am to WDE24
quote:
#KyleRittenhouse - NEW: Families of those killed were told to go to the courtroom per pool reporter. @LawCrimeNetwork
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:58 am to ducktale
quote:I’m not wrong, you just don’t comprehend well. Check the definition of the word “often” and get back to me.
Wrong.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:58 am to OMLandshark
NYT reporter saying there is a verdict.
quote:
BREAKING: The 12-person jury has reached a verdict in the homicide trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, according to two people familiar with the proceedings. @juliebosman reports. We're in the courtroom waiting for the verdict to be read.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 11:59 am to GEAUXmedic
I need to leave for a meeting in 20 minutes, hurry the frick up.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:00 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:meaning it's not a hung jury. frick.
The 12-person jury has reached a verdict
guessing they convicted on lesser charges as a compromise.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:00 pm to redandright
INNOCENT 
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:02 pm to Nyquillus Dillwad
Is it innocent? Or are you just saying that?
Page 110 of 115
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News