- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Julianne Moore is taking a stand for gun control
Posted on 3/5/18 at 12:57 am to weagle99
Posted on 3/5/18 at 12:57 am to weagle99
So.
By your assertion Christoph Waltz should have turned QT down for the Inglorious Basterds role because he didn’t want to endorse Nazism or the Holocaust?
This is literally no different. Made especially worse by how many of her roles were some form of police/government agent. And how long ago some of those pictures are. It’s not like she has made gun wielding a cornerstone of her acting career.
Now if someone like Willis made a stand, you’d have more of a point.
I’m anti gun banning as they come. But that doesn’t justify a stupid argument.
By your assertion Christoph Waltz should have turned QT down for the Inglorious Basterds role because he didn’t want to endorse Nazism or the Holocaust?
This is literally no different. Made especially worse by how many of her roles were some form of police/government agent. And how long ago some of those pictures are. It’s not like she has made gun wielding a cornerstone of her acting career.
Now if someone like Willis made a stand, you’d have more of a point.
I’m anti gun banning as they come. But that doesn’t justify a stupid argument.
This post was edited on 3/5/18 at 1:10 am
0
Posted on 3/5/18 at 1:02 am to Merck
quote:
You do realize "gun control" doesn't mean "destroy all guns," right? It is possible to want certain limitations on gun ownership AND still be an advocate for proper use of firearms, like, for instance, in the hands of a trained, professional, law enforcement agent.
Lol, no one believes that shite. The left isnt going to stop pushing gun control no matter what laws are passed. Australia and Norway for example are scrounging for even deeper gun control, even after bans and buybacks.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 3:03 am to weagle99
I wonder if her bush is red?
Posted on 3/5/18 at 3:28 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I think the point is that you can't be anti gun while glorifying guns to make millions of dollars
Anyone saying Hollywood doesn't glorify gun violence is an idiot.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 3:36 am to Brazos
Love to unload some shots on her arse.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 3:54 am to weagle99
quote:
Ignore how she made her money though.
You mean by playing fictional characters? Guess Anthony Hopkins can't say shite about cannibalism from now on huh? You probably still believe wrestlers act like their characters in real life.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 8:36 am to PearlJam
quote:quote:Those were set props. She didn't actually work for the feds for a living.
Ignore how she made her money though.
Right, props set up to glorify gun violence.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 8:41 am to weagle99
What a hypocrite
Posted on 3/5/18 at 8:42 am to weagle99
I've also seen actors/actresses play roles as murderers and child molestors, yet they claim to be against those actions.
So hypocritical!!
So hypocritical!!
Posted on 3/5/18 at 8:56 am to Merck
quote:
You do realize "gun control" doesn't mean "destroy all guns," right? It is possible to want certain limitations on gun ownership AND still be an advocate for proper use of firearms, like, for instance, in the hands of a trained, professional, law enforcement agent.
I agree with this but I think those advocates need to take it a step further and demonstrate the latter half of your statement.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News