- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JFK and AI
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:31 pm to winkchance
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:31 pm to winkchance
If there was in fact a conspiracy to kill Kennedy by all the different power brokers that wanted him dead, one of the most impressive feats they were able to accomplish was to get a vast majority of people completely preoccupied with LHO, and if he acted alone or not.
Who actually fired the round that killed him is far less important than who ordered it and why.
Oswald was the fall guy. I don't give a single a shite about him.
I would like to know more about those that ordered it, and those who were complicit in making it happen and in covering it up.
I know that Johnny Rosetti, Sam Giancana and Carlo Marcello were deeply involved I'm both the Kennedy and MLK assassinations, but those types are to be expected.
I'm more interested in the involvement of Alan Dulles, LBJ, the Secret Service, Aristotle Onassis etc etc etc.
Who actually fired the round that killed him is far less important than who ordered it and why.
Oswald was the fall guy. I don't give a single a shite about him.
I would like to know more about those that ordered it, and those who were complicit in making it happen and in covering it up.
I know that Johnny Rosetti, Sam Giancana and Carlo Marcello were deeply involved I'm both the Kennedy and MLK assassinations, but those types are to be expected.
I'm more interested in the involvement of Alan Dulles, LBJ, the Secret Service, Aristotle Onassis etc etc etc.
0
Posted on 3/23/25 at 9:47 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
also how the Holy Bible was written
Posted on 3/24/25 at 6:45 am to Jake88
Yet, 1 bullet cannot account for the 7 entry wounds utilizing magic. Physics has disproven it. Bullets donor stop in mid-air & turn.
Also, see this statement:
What did the staff observe? An entrance wound on Kennedy’s throat. What does that suggest? A bullet entered from the front. Why is that significant? It contradicts the findings of the Warren Commission.”
Also, see this statement:
What did the staff observe? An entrance wound on Kennedy’s throat. What does that suggest? A bullet entered from the front. Why is that significant? It contradicts the findings of the Warren Commission.”
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 6:49 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:43 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:You still think JFK was sitting directly behind the governor. He wasn't. Jfk was behind and to the right of the governor. The back seat of the car was wider than that where the governor sat.
Yet, 1 bullet cannot account for the 7 entry wounds utilizing magic. Physics has disproven it. Bullets donor stop in mid-air & turn.
quote:That was an exit wound. You're wrong.
What did the staff observe? An entrance wound on Kennedy’s throat
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 7:45 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:39 am to Jake88
quote:
You still think JFK was sitting directly behind the governor. He wasn't. Jfk was behind and to the right of the governor. The back seat of the car was wider than that where the governor sat.
No, I understand where JFK was sitting. Doesn't change facts. It also doen't change the fact that a bullet cannot change direction mid-flight w/o hitting anything.
quote:
What did the staff observe? An entrance wound on Kennedy’s throat
I quoted reports bud. Follow the facts, not your opinion.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 8:41 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 9:06 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:It impacted a rib. That will alter trajectory.
No, I understand where JFK was sitting. Doesn't change facts. It also doen't change the fact that a bullet cannot change direction mid-flight w/o hitting anything
Nobody except for quacks and people looking for attention and book money are claiming the anterior wound on his neck was an entry wound, not the autopsy nor other credible examiners who have done later analysis.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 9:07 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:17 am to Jake88
quote:
It impacted a rib. That will alter trajectory.
... not in mid-air after exiting the person.
- after exiting JFK, the bullet sits in mid-air 1.6 seconds before hitting Connelly???
- once hitting Connelly, the bullet hits his rib, changes direction inside his body, and exits his chest in a strong left direction (towards the front-left side of the car). THEN, the bullet changes direction mid-air and shatters Connelly's right wrist, then his left thigh.
.... no.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:22 am to Ping Pong
quote:
unless we learn more about Lee Harvey Oswald's whereabouts and associations in the months prior to the shooting.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 10:29 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:This is entirely fantasy. You believe the movie. No mid air foolishness happened.
not in mid-air after exiting the person.
- after exiting JFK, the bullet sits in mid-air 1.6 seconds before hitting Connelly???
- once hitting Connelly, the bullet hits his rib, changes direction inside his body, and exits his chest in a strong left direction (towards the front-left side of the car). THEN, the bullet changes direction mid-air and shatters Connelly's right wrist, then his left thigh.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:12 pm to Jake88
No sir. I don’t believe the Oliver Stone movie. I’m utilizing facts from reports. I’ve watched the film one time since it’s released. Do they mention those details in the film?
Also, I thought you were finished with this topic
Also, I thought you were finished with this topic
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 12:25 pm to BigNastyTiger417
The facts do not suggest what you posted.
This is the path...
This is the path...
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:34 pm to BigNastyTiger417
That study was commissioned by someone who wanted to find another theory. Researchers then know what the commisioner of the study wants. They based it off of a 60 year old 2-D film. This is more likely than not a case of garbage in, garbage out, maybe not intentionally, and you make a splash publicly for your business. They cannot precisely know the exact position when the bullet hit such that a laser is the final say. In fact the spokesman for the lab deferred to ballistic experts to do further study. The pathology lines up with the one bullet striking Kennedy, exiting his neck and tumbling to produce larger entry and exit wounds on the governor. Those are the facts.
Now the use of an attention seeking mafioso like Gravano really lends weigh to the grassy knoll theory.
Here is the path again, laser would show this. Its not that amazing.
Now the use of an attention seeking mafioso like Gravano really lends weigh to the grassy knoll theory.
Here is the path again, laser would show this. Its not that amazing.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:18 pm to TackySweater
Don’t like history I guess.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:21 pm to Jake88
Studies show the line does not match up. It’s not that difficult. Also, the kill shot doesn’t line up either. So, there’s that.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:57 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
Actually, eyewitnesses are one of the most reliable sources utilized throughout history. It is literally what our criminal justice system uses today…just like being used to compose the Holy Bible.
There is so much hilariously wrong with this post.
1. Eyewitnesses are responsible for the majority of false prosecutions and false convictions in this country
2. Large parts of the New Testament were written multiple generations after Jesus had died.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:06 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
1. Eye witnesses are also largely responsible only for accurate prosecution.
2. Large parts of the Bible are literal eye witness testimonies.
Try again.
2. Large parts of the Bible are literal eye witness testimonies.
Try again.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:41 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:Studies do show the shots line up. So there's that. It appears we are at an impasse.
Studies show the line does not match up. It’s not that difficult. Also, the kill shot doesn’t line up either. So, there’s that.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:49 pm to Jake88
1. 2nd shot does not line up (numerous studies)
2. Kill shot does not line up (multiple studies)
Try again
2. Kill shot does not line up (multiple studies)
Try again
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:55 pm to Ping Pong
quote:
There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.
Despite what anyone says, this is demonstrably true. There is absolutely no evidence anyone besides Lee Harvey Oswald fired shots that day.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News