- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it fair to say at this point Alec Baldwin will not be facing justice?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:39 am to 0x15E
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:39 am to 0x15E
This dude was arguing a point but trying to make everyone do the research for him. He’s an idiot and obviously knows nothing about gun safety. Movie, play, shite- imaginary game outside. You NEVER point a gun at ANYONE.
But he was acting, No he wasn’t, he was being a careless dipshit that took someone’s life. Now did he do it on purpose? Who knows. But there has to be some penalty in taking a life because of negligence.
But he was acting, No he wasn’t, he was being a careless dipshit that took someone’s life. Now did he do it on purpose? Who knows. But there has to be some penalty in taking a life because of negligence.
2
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:50 am to LookingForAnswers
Countless actors in movies have pointed guns at people and pulled the trigger. Because it is… a movie. The expectation of the gun having a live round in it is very different from a normal life scenario.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:52 am to Vamos Brandonos
He was never going to face criminal chargers.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:55 am to OweO
quote:
You want to know the truth? I honestly don't give a frick.
If you want to know the truth, I don’t give a frick that you don’t give a frick. Just here to note how refreshing it is not to see you write a full blown book report of a post.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:56 am to Vamos Brandonos
It's fair to say that its obvious some people are above the law. It didn't used to be that way and its sad.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 7:58 am to sabes que
Just because it’s a movie and you don’t “expect “ something to happen doesn’t mean you aren’t at fault for negligence. That’s when gun safety is even MORE important.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:00 am to Vamos Brandonos
People only want him charged because he made fun of Trump for so long.
No one wanted the guy that killed Bruce Lee's son charged.
The fault lay in the hands of the propmaster and armorer.
Gun should not have been live.
No one wanted the guy that killed Bruce Lee's son charged.
The fault lay in the hands of the propmaster and armorer.
Gun should not have been live.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:01 am to LookingForAnswers
You think John Wayne checked to see if the gun had a live round in it before every shot?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:03 am to Vamos Brandonos
Liberals would be screaming from the gates of hell for Trump to be charged if he accidentally killed someone like Baldwin had done.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:03 am to sabes que
It doesn’t matter if he did or not. Still doesn’t give an excuse for negligence.
You know if you were in this situation you wouldn’t be here typing today.
You know if you were in this situation you wouldn’t be here typing today.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:03 am to Blutarsky
Just like conservatives are doing with Baldwin?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:04 am to Vamos Brandonos
The rich and powerful people are subjected to a different set of laws. It's why you'll never see guys like Trump and Biden go down for the crimes they committed.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:05 am to sabes que
quote:
Just like conservatives are doing with Baldwin?
Other than this post, I haven’t seen much on it recently.
Baldwin would be leading the charge if Trump had done this.
This post was edited on 4/21/22 at 8:08 am
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:07 am to Blutarsky
And would that make it right?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:08 am to sabes que
quote:
And would that make it right?
Who is saying it does?
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:11 am to Blutarsky
It seems like you are implying that
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:12 am to LookingForAnswers
quote:
This dude was arguing a point but trying to make everyone do the research for him. He’s an idiot and obviously knows nothing about gun safety.
Are you retarded?
OP made an assertion. I asked them what it was based on. No one could answer. I then looked up the statute, posted it, and gave a brief analysis.
I swear, I don’t know how some of you function on a daily basis.
Eta: Obtuse is the real MVP, though. No way I was jumping on Lexis at 10pm for the OT
This post was edited on 4/21/22 at 8:30 am
Posted on 4/21/22 at 8:39 am to LookingForAnswers
quote:
You know if you were in this situation you wouldn’t be here typing today.
Yes he would.
The production hires an armorer whose job it is to be the person who takes the responsibility for all matters involving the firearms on set and who the takes on the liability in regards to them.
It's not the actors responsibility to know how to operate every firearm they touch or know the difference between a live round or a blank in the firearms they act with.
If anyone is liable here, it's likely the armorer. the actor's job is to act, confidently knowing that someone was hired and on set to load, perform maintenance on, and deliver the proper firearms.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 9:05 am to jrowla2
quote:
He clearly wasn’t wanting to kill the woman or know gun was loaded.
This is almost as idiotic as Joshjrn. YOU HAVE A LETHAL WEAPON IN YOUR HANDS BRO. frickIEN CHECK THE CHAMBER!
There should be no "want to" with a gun. You checked it or you didn't. Good talk.
Posted on 4/21/22 at 9:08 am to Joshjrn
|I honestly haven’t gone digging through the criminal statutes in what I assume was California. I’m simply surprised that so many on this board seem to have done so, at least based on their certainty regarding the subject.
Eta: New Mexico, apparently.|
This is your post. You admit you didn’t look up the laws. Even had the state wrong. I know your little sensitive arse can only retort to name calling so keep it up. Clown
Eta: New Mexico, apparently.|
This is your post. You admit you didn’t look up the laws. Even had the state wrong. I know your little sensitive arse can only retort to name calling so keep it up. Clown
This post was edited on 4/21/22 at 9:09 am
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News